It should be noted, however, that rational choice theory, long ascendant among economists as the preferred assumption of how an individual will, or should choose among set of alternatives, became increasingly challenged. Despite its hegemony in economics and substantial influence in political science and sociology, Herbert Simon, a decision theorist, used behavioral studies to examine, among other things, the adequacy of the theory. Simon’s “bounded rationality” did not quarrel with rationality as a guiding principle in human affairs but with what constitutes rationality. The concept of “satisficing” has also been developed by those who reject the normative expectations and assumptions of the rational choice model in circumstances when not
The classical economists’ flirtation with the labor theory of value (LTV) has been criticized as a dead-end street What is the labor theory of value? How does Ricardo use the labor theory of value to critique Smith’s theory of value? What are the chief criticisms of the LTV. The standard critique assumes that the sole point of the LTV was to explain relative prices. Would Sraffa agree?
words: freak and economics. Freak, by definition, means abnormality or oddity and most people might familiarize economics solely with finance or commerce. However, Levitt and Dubner break this common misconception and reveal how to world actually works, as opposed to distinguishing everything with morality and how everyone thinks the world should work. Book Report
As the advertisement is giving a false and non-scientific statement and it will misguide the public. I think that Vibram should test their product by conducting some experiment to verify the abilities of the product. • Economic Point of View Although profit is often use to measure the success of the company, but an organization should also doing businesses ethically. However, doing business ethically would give some impact to your organization.
‘But man has almost constant occasion for the help of his brethren, and it is in vain for him to expect it from their benevolence only. He will be more likely to prevail if he can interest their self-love in his favour (..).’ As Adam Smith wrote in chapter 5 of ‘The Wealth of Nations’. Whereas this theory stands to reason at the beginning of many economic theories, specifically that of the rational and self-interested consumer, the act of tipping seems to be part of economic behavior at the opposite direction of Smith’s. Many – unobservable - factors seem to play a role in tipping behavior, leading to imperfect conditions in which consumers choose not to act out of self-interest.
In the book “Being Consumed Economics and Christian Desire” William T. Cavanaugh covers a couple of important topics in the economic world some which are sometimes suppressed and not talked about freely and some which are sometimes misunderstood and he evaluates these rather well. He explains his idea of thought on them. The major topics of the book are Consumerism, Globalisation and a major topic is “freedom” in the market place and how that is portrayed through countries and companies. It feels like William is trying to portray through his writings that the free trade world that we know of is actually more complicated than just the top that we see. It goes a bit deeper and has more meaning to it really.
Melisa Barron Ethics- Journal 8 As we look at the controversial question, “is it just to tax the rich to help the poor?” we need to look at it from the “Original Position”. In John Rawls Method, he discusses these two principles: • The Principle of Equal Liberty • The Difference Principle
(Bowie 2013, 42) Therefore one could believe that the reason for why economics is a foe of ethics, is mainly because of the classical equilibrium economies, in which the economy is formed by the behaviours of individuals and firms. To expand, Bowie argues that the ideological "assumptions" which underpin equilibrium economics "obliterates ethics" (Bowie 2013, 32) However, Bowie's position is uncertain because he believes that the world of economics has moved past this theory of classic equilibrium
Which relation can we extract from the legal concept of property with the bargaining theory? Could our assumptions change if the liability of the parties is changeable? Ronald Coase’s essay, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ is still a focus of controversy and discussion, since most researchers still cannot agree with the premise that the Coase Theorem tries to convey , claiming that the law should follow the principle of efficiency of the economic field. Does every legal case have an economic perspective that should be taken into account by the court before making a
Before indicating difficulties, that may arise out of the presentation of greed and grievance as separated and even contradicting, some possible reasons why that narrative is applied at all will be discussed. Keen states regarding this, that “the tool drives the analysis instead the other way around”. This is not unrealistic, as by a closer examination it becomes clear that most proxies do fit into both lines of argumentation, but were squeezed by Collier and Hoeffler into the greed model, perhaps in order to justify economical interventions, liberalization and investments. One example for this is the proxy peace duration, which was used as indicator for low cost of conflict-specific capital, while it however also could be a proxy for the grievance-approach,