The Importance Of Speech Codes In Schools
Entering adulthood it is important to learn how to express one’s views effectively. The First Amendment protects our right to express our beliefs, however, our right to speak should not inhibit others right to their own voices. Lucia Valdivia, a professor at Reed College, believes the key is to be open to others opinions, not necessarily having to respect them or agree with them.
At colleges such as Emory University, hate speech codes are being enacted to outline prohibited behavior. Banned behavior includes conduct directed at any person or, group of people because of their race, color, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, or veteran 's status and that has the purpose of creating an offensive, demeaning, intimidating, or hostile environment (Uelmen). FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) defines “speech codes” as a university 's policy
…show more content…
Speech codes on campuses have been used since the 1980s (Welch). They started speech codes on campuses due to an increase of student protesters and controversial content. Some people argue that the speech codes encourage positivity and protect against hate crimes, But according to the article by Welch, “Any argument may hold a kernel of truth but even without that, our beliefs can still be strengthened.” Speech codes discourage students from having open conversations about important issues. Even when problems are uncomfortable for some students, talking about them is still necessary in order to better understand the problem and find solutions. According to one faculty handbook on disruptive student policy, it is against school rules to be disruptive in class. The handbook says that a disruption is defined by the professor, meaning that this rule could encompass a large variety of punishable behaviors. In this way, many schools enact speech codes that not only restrict students freedoms, but do so in a way that allows faculty members to pick and choose which free speech is
Rhetorical Analysis Of 'The Coddling Of The American Mind'
895 Words | 4 PagesTrigger Warnings on College Campuses Rhetorical Analysis Writers Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, in their article “The Coddling of the American Mind”, detail the effects that safe spaces and trigger warnings are having on college campuses. They claim that “in the name of emotional well-being, college students are increasingly demanding protection from words and ideas they don’t like” and add they will explain “why that’s disastrous for education and mental health”. Through the use of the word “increasingly”, the writers recognize that not all students are following the damaging trend, but instead it is becoming progressively prevalent and as a result needs to be addressed. Throughout the article, explanations are given for the stance against shielding students from opinions they find oppressive, as well as ways to combat and fix the problem. Through this, the writers hope to promote a college experience where students can feel safe and
Supreme Court Case Of Bethel School District V. Fraser
481 Words | 2 PagesFollowing this public speech qualified as disruptive, vulgar and obscene, according to the school’s rules, Fraser will be suspended for two days and his name will be removed from a graduation ceremony speakers’ list. Based on these aforementioned facts, Fraser’s father, supported the American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU) will file a lawsuit against the school for violating the First Amendment right to freedom of speech of his son, Matthew Fraser, and will ask for a monetary reparation against the prejudice. As a consequence of this lawsuit, the issue will be discussed, first, before a Federal District Court. Over there, the judge will give a verdict favorable to Fraser on the ground that the
Is Watt Justified In Dismissing Anna's Dismissal Summary
789 Words | 4 PagesEven though teachers are protected by the First Amendment they must avoid speech that creates a negative impact on decorum. "Free speech by teachers, however, is limited to the requirement that such speech does not create a material disruption to the educational interest of the school district" (Essex, 2012, p. 204). Material disruption "may involve an interference with the rights of others or may involve speech that creates a negative impact on proper school discipline and decorum"(Essex, 2012, p.
Jonathan And Oliver Case Study
1042 Words | 5 PagesJonathan/Oliver: Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser Jonathan: Petitioners: Bethel School District Jonathan: Respondents: Matthew N. Fraser Oliver: Petitioners’ Claim: That punishing Fraser for using offensive language in high school assembly speech did not violate the freedom of speech Oliver: Bethel School District v. Fraser was a United States Supreme Court decision involving free speech in public. Parties of the Case: Bethel School District / Matthew Fraser Oliver: The Bethel School District has an estimated enrollment of over 18,000 students. Jonathan: Matthew Fraser is a 17-year-old senior who attends Bethel High School in Washington.
Summary Of The Court Case Of Skinner Vs. Hoover High School
708 Words | 3 PagesThe question presented is whether, a high school regulation, requiring that student athletes “stand in a respectful manner throughout the National Anthem during any sporting event in which their team is participating” violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court should rule for the defendant Jane Skinner, utilizing the case of Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) and Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969). Which both implies that her actions were resulted from materially and substantially interfere with other student, and therefore justifies Jane Skinners actions. Facts: On October 4, 2017 Jane Skinner who is the principal of Alabama’s Hoover High School, informed both students and parents of a new sporting
Speech On College Campuses: Lukianoff And Haidt
1230 Words | 5 PagesLukianoff and Haidt provide examples of how students are trying to eliminate speech that may be found offensive or discomforting on campus in their article for The Atlantic. Two fairly recent terms to understanding this development in student ideology are “microaggression” and “trigger warning.” A microaggression is inadvertently insulting someone or a group of people with something that was not meant to be offensive. A trigger warning is a warning often provided to students when the subject matter of a class may be found offensive or elicit a strong emotional response. These two terms represent the change in ideology towards speech on campuses.
Greg Lukianoff And Haidt's The Coddling Of The American Mind
660 Words | 3 PagesVindictive protectiveness is stopping students from learning anything in the four years or more that they spend in college. If they aren’t allowed to speak their mind there is no room for growth. The only thing they are learning is that speech should be under strict control by authorities. Thus teaching them that there really is no freedom of speech under the first
Morse V. Fredrick Rhetorical Analysis
565 Words | 3 PagesLee Rowland, an ACLU staff attorney, states, “School officials aren’t permitted to listen in on chatter at students’ private gatherings with friends, or rifle through their private videos and photo albums. Nor should we permit them to do so simply because those conversations or images are digital.” There are so many cases in which our Freedom of Speech, Freedom of
Hate Speech College Campuses
1116 Words | 5 PagesI will argue for speech codes on college campuses because they create more good than harm to students on college campuses. The two reasons in support of speech codes on college campuses are that hate speech is prohibitive to a learning environment and secondly that hate speech does cause harm to the person or persons being attacked. The strongest objection against speech codes on college campuses is that speech codes are illegal because they infringe upon the rights of US citizens because of the US Constitutions first amendment. My first reason for speech codes on college campuses is that hate speech is prohibitive to a learning environment. My reasoning for believing so is because the primary purpose of colleges/universities and general education is to promote learning and knowledge while individuals can broaden their mental horizons and develop their own opinions.
The Coddling Of The American Mind Summary
1028 Words | 5 PagesA Look Inside: “The Coddling of the American Mind” In the September 2015 issue of The Atlantic, the article, “The Coddling of the American Mind” co-written by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathon Haidt, was published. In this article, Lukianoff and Haidt make the argument that students of American colleges have become increasingly sensitive towards speech that could be deemed “offensive” or “triggering. And in an effort to appease students as well as avoid any possibility of a lawsuit being brought against them, colleges have become more willing to accommodate classes, by removing this type of speech from the curriculum.
Posner's Argument
460 Words | 2 PagesIn the essay, University is Right to Crack Down on Speech and Behavior by Eric Posner argues that students today are more like children than adults and need protection. Posner would always refer back to the college student and how they are still kids not age wise but as their maturity. “The problem is that universities have been treating children like adults.” (Posner 185). The context of his argument is involved with the speed codes.
Racist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words
707 Words | 3 PagesIf someone is going to have a conversation with another person, than their freedom of speech should be protected, however; if someone had the sole intentions of causing harm or discomfort to the person that they were speaking with or at, then their freedom of speech may not be so protected. This should be of no concern to any persons on a college campus who are worrying about their right to freedom of speech or expression being neglected, considering that speech codes only work to prevent harm inflicted by hate speech to all students. I agree with Lawrence in that if we are going to end racism, we, as a society, have to take small steps in protecting minority
Freedom Of Speech In College Essay
905 Words | 4 PagesFree speech and hate speech can be classified as different topics and when arguing for one, we can also criticize the other. Free expression and free speech on campuses are crucial for sparking important conversations about equality and social justice, and the suspension of free speech and expression may have dire consequences on college campuses. First, freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views, while also allowing students with common beliefs to align. Free speech and the call for free speech allows those who have been historically systematically oppressed to use their voice.
The Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech
1152 Words | 5 PagesThe ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate
Argumentative Essay On Safe Space
1158 Words | 5 PagesThe term “safe space”, a supposed haven where students of minority and marginalization can feel free to express their ideas and be themselves has started a movement across college campuses nationwide. The newfangled movement is driven largely by students who wish to scrub campuses clean of offensive or discomforting topics. Safe spaces emerged during the post-Civil Rights era where women, LGBTQ, and racial minorities grew in presence on campuses; however, today they serve as refuges for like-minded people who don’t feel the need to explain or defend their personal beliefs. Recently, the safe space debate has taken a controversial turn: arguments and cases have been created over whether safe spaces provide a supportive environment or cultivate
More about The Importance Of Speech Codes In Schools
Rhetorical Analysis Of 'The Coddling Of The American Mind'
895 Words | 4 PagesSupreme Court Case Of Bethel School District V. Fraser
481 Words | 2 PagesIs Watt Justified In Dismissing Anna's Dismissal Summary
789 Words | 4 PagesJonathan And Oliver Case Study
1042 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of The Court Case Of Skinner Vs. Hoover High School
708 Words | 3 PagesSpeech On College Campuses: Lukianoff And Haidt
1230 Words | 5 PagesGreg Lukianoff And Haidt's The Coddling Of The American Mind
660 Words | 3 PagesMorse V. Fredrick Rhetorical Analysis
565 Words | 3 PagesHate Speech College Campuses
1116 Words | 5 PagesThe Coddling Of The American Mind Summary
1028 Words | 5 PagesPosner's Argument
460 Words | 2 PagesRacist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words
707 Words | 3 PagesFreedom Of Speech In College Essay
905 Words | 4 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech
1152 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay On Safe Space
1158 Words | 5 Pages