The Hagia Sophia is one of the best examples of an appropriated structure in modern history. When the Ottoman Empire seized Constantinople after a fifty four day siege, Mehmed II took Hagia Sophia for himself and commandeered this one of a kind structure. When Mehmed II captured the Hagia Sophia, something rare occurred, he preserved the structure and Byzantine art in this sacred building. Mehmed had, possibly unknowingly, preserved the building during his reign. Creating lore and mythology help bonds an emperor or entire empires to previous powers to create a link. The Hagia Sophia is no different. Mohammad had ‘prophesied’ that the first Muslim to pray in the Hagia Sophia would go to paradise, creating the ties Mehmed II needed to have rightful …show more content…
This structure would have been known throughout the entire continent and would inspire rulers to seize it to show they held the ultimate power. When the siege came to an end in the 1490’s, Mehmed II was successful and Hagia Sophia was now his. His capture of the Hagia Sophia fulfilled the prophecy that was told by Mohammad. The Muslim lore layered itself in the timeline of the Hagia Sophia, and began a new narrative to this building. However, the lore forgets to mention the previous owners of the Hagia Sophia, therefore, we begin the start of a relationship at odds. The relationship of preservation and appropriation. To announce Mehmed II’s triumph the, “added specific elements such as the minaret and the mihrab to indicate transformation and appropriation of the building and to signal the victory of Islam.” Mehmed II made his presence known and started the immediate conversion of the Christian, Hagia Sophia into a Muslim, Hagia Sophia. With his new additions he hid other forms of art that were displayed prominently in Hagia Sophia. With Hagia Sophia once been a Christian place of worship, figural depictions of Jesus Christ were included in the ceiling of the church. When Mehmed took over he did not abolish the
One of these being the Hagia Sophia, known for being a fundamental landmark for the Byzantine Empire. Turkey has come a long way from being controlled by the Ottomans. They struggled many hardships, but were able to overcome and accomplish much. Now standing tall and proud to represent their history.
Monuments that are constructed in order to give commendation to people, places, or events are located all over the globe. It is very possible for someone to find a few in their very own town. Although there may be negative controversy on certain monuments, many throughout the world have changed individual’s lives tremendously in a beneficial way. One monument in particular has stood tall through it all and has had so much positive effect on millions of people from the beginning of time. One hundred and thirty years later this monument continues to impact people’s lives from all over the world.
After I watched “Losing their Marbles –Greece” it reminded me of the Axum obelisk, which was recently returned to its home country Ethiopia after 68 years. This obelisk was looted by fascist Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. There were Ethio-Italy war, in the late 19th century and Italy defeated by Ethiopian at Adwa, but the fascist Italy, invaded Ethiopia, again in 1935 and the war was lasted for five years. During this war, the Italian military controlled the northern parts of Ethiopia, and the Ethiopian different heritages were in the northern part of the country. When the Italian went back to their home they took different Ethiopian heritages, one of this was Axum obelisk.
Justinian chose to enforce Christianity as the official religion of the Byzantine Empire, hence unifying society through the belief in Jesus Christ. This differs from ancient Rome where there was no official religion enforced. Justinian built the Hagia Sophia, an incredible and “exceedingly beautiful” (Document 4) church in Constantinople. This helped enforce the religion into people’s daily lives because everybody who walked into the church believed in God because it was universally understood “[that] by the influence of God...this work has been perfected” (Document 4). Because the architecture and vibes inside the church were so strong, people began to believe in the religion and create a different culture than ancient Rome.
Many buildings in the earlier days were built for the same reasons and by similar people, meaning the Hagia Sophia and Charlemagne’s Chapel don’t differ much in terms of being built. The Hagia Sophia in Istanbul was originally built under Constantine the Great until it was demolished and rebuilt between 532 and 537 under the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I (Hagia Sophia, Istanbul 1). Justinian’s Basilica is considered the perfect example of the Byzantine culture and the structures produced during its
During the 16th and 17th century areas that were forbidden before began to change. These were areas were humans were only entitled to know what God wanted to reveal, otherwise they were inaccessible or forbidden. The limits on the knowledge humans were able to possess became more accessible during the 16th and 17th centuries. The Reformation shows the decline of the Catholic Church and the rise of questioning authority leading to the Scientific Revolution. The Scientific Revolution showed that observations and conclusions became an acceptable source of knowledge and truth, where it had been less so in earlier times.
The Medici will later use the Old Sacristy as a tomb for their family. This building was significant because it help set the tone for a new style of architecture. It was built around proportions and classical orders. Which become popular in the Italian Renaissance Era. It was completed around the year 1440, but
There, the priests would perform religious events. The reason they built them high was because they wanted the shrine to be close to the heavens. To them, it was a bridge between heaven and earth. Later on, ziggurats became not only the center of religion, but also the center of learning for the entire community.
The Pantheon and Brunelleschi 's Dome in Florence both share a common idea of the dome in ancient history. They were built and different times, the Pantheon and Brunelleschi 's Dome differ in both design and architecture. This paper is going to analyze the Pantheon in Rome and Brunelleschi 's Dome in terms of their constructional and design techniques, and their historical circumstances of the construction of them both. The Pantheon is one of the remaining and properly maintained buildings of the first century.
If you have never had the opportunity to see the Parthenon in Greece and the Pantheon in Italy, it’s possible that the similarity of the names would lead you to believe that they are the same or, at least, almost identical. While it is true that certain elements of the buildings mirror each other, there are major differences in their structures and functions. The architecture of each reflects the cultural ideals of the times. After the Greeks overcame the Persian invasion, Athens became the head of all of the Greek city-states. During this period, the country enjoyed peace and great prosperity.
Introduction: The Two Buildings; Parthenon in Athens and Pantheon in Rome are both classical heritage of the former world powers. Both buildings were temple built and dedicated to the gods of Athens and Romans. The excellent strength and the durability of these temples are unimaginable. Going by the length of time that these buildings have been in existence, one cannot but admires the brilliance of the ancient Greek and Roman architects for such excellent edifices that have outlived many generations, and yet remain a symbol of ancient Greek and Roman history.
Justinian is best known for his ambitious building projects, which included the construction of the Hagia Sophia, one of the most iconic buildings in the world. Justinian was also a great military leader and was able to reclaim much of the territory that had been lost to neighboring empires. The Byzantine Empire faced many challenges throughout its history, including invasions by the Persians, Arabs, and Turks. Despite these challenges, the empire was able to survive for over a thousand years, thanks in part to its strategic location and strong leadership.
As a matter of fact, the monumental core in Washington D,C, seems to bring people together, like if it is a place of sacred religion, rather than push them away. The experience of getting to step foot on what seems to be holy ground, rings true to many at the time. “But we must not forget that in the disenchanted world of the modern secular nation, the monument is not, properly speaking, a sacred site.” Source A (Savage) Yes, it is perhaps true that many of the monuments that are built in the century we live in today, are on a site that has no historical background to it.
The Fall of Constantinople on May 29, 1453 by the Ottoman Turks was a battle that changed the world history. When the Ottoman Turks conquered Constantinople, the capitol city of the Eastern Roman Empire, a new country was later developed known as Turkey. With this conquest, a new group of people came in with a different religion known as Islam. I decided to write about this battle, because I wanted to learn more about how and why the Ottoman Turks decided to fight for this land. Another reason why I decided to write on this topic is because, if it was not for the invention of cannons, gun powders and Sultan Mehmed II’s strategies, the defeat would have not been easy and possible.
The style of the building and the purpose it is built give a brief and thoughtful storybook about the culture of the architect as art, generally, and architecture, particularly, is a language itself. Thus, buildings narrate the stories of the people among the history and tell their traditions and habits to the next generation through its design, inscriptions, and details. In this essay, I will discuss how both the style and function of the Greek Parthenon and the Roman Pantheon served as typical examples of their cultures in Athens and ancient Rome. In addition to the similarities and differences between these two cultures through the two buildings. Both the Greek and the Roman architecture inspired the cultures and architects until these days due to the diverse meaning they carry and symbolize in astonishing ways through the different orders, columns, roofs, friezes, and domes.