The Importance Of The Separation Of Powers

The use of symbolism is an important rhetorical device used within this editorial cartoon because, in politics, the donkey symbolizes the democratic government while the elephant symbolizes the republican government. This symbolizes how the democratic government thinks about terrorism and how they apply simple minded solutions to many topics that require a much deeper analysis. The democratic government thinks that banning all guns will stop terrorism when there are plenty of other ways to conduct violence without the use of guns. In the past decade, there has been a high number of terrorist attacks carried out by many different people. The democratic government over time has not grasped the concept that banning guns will not stop terrorism alone.

These are the balances in the 3 branches of power. The legislative branch, executive branch, and judicial branch. In the constitution, there is a diagram showing which branch has power for each other. This protects against an absolute power because if each branch checks on each other, it is certain that they will not become powerful than one another. In document C, it states “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other….

Like Document A, Document B was written by James Madison. He writes of how government is split, and how one can avoid tyranny in government. In Federalist Paper #47 it reads, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the hands, whether of one, few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny… .(L)iberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The three branches, legislative, executive, and judicial, is said to eliminate any form of tyranny.

The reason why I think the constitution should be ratified because of the separation of powers. All the branches had more than one job to do. The legislative(congress) writes the laws, confirms presidential appointments. The Executive(president) proposes laws, administers the laws and appoints ambassadors and other officials. Last the Judicial(supreme court) Interpret the constitution and other laws and reviews lower-court decisions.

Today the US government has a legislative branch, an executive branch (commander in chief), and a judicial branch. Each branch doesn’t have more control than the other nor does it full power. Based on James Madison, “...Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The legislative branch is responsible for making laws, controlling money, raising an army, impeach(fire) the commander in chief, declare wars, etc. The second branch, the executive branch is also known as the president.

Petition of Right is when they King become answerable to others and not just God. The King said they were only answerable to God. The divine right of the Kings was a very unpopular thing among the people because the King couldn't be wrong, but they didn't want to disobey the King or God. Article 1; Section 9 is an example of the many ways the Constitution limits our government. The framers did not want the government to have complete and total power so they limited the government.

As Harry Browne once said, “Since no one but you can know what 's best for you, government control can 't make your life better.” In Fahrenheit 451, a book by Ray Bradbury, he shows ways on how the government is controlling society with surveillance, technology, and censorship. The government gets to decide what is to be done and what comes in and out of that country. In the novel, it shows how the firefighter, Guy Montag, is different than the other people in that society. These aspects of government control are directly going towards Montag because the advance in technology put into the watchdogs that are in Bradbury’s novel is unbelievable.

This is first shown when Hazel states she believes she would make a good Handicapper General, George responds to her by saying she’d be “Good as anybody else,” due to the fact that nobody can be better than anybody at anything. This is especially prejudicial against politicians because they will not be able to have progressive ideas. If everyone who runs for office must wear handicaps that forces them to be the same as everybody else in the nation it forces a state of stagnation of ideas for the country. Another example of the culmination of positive change is presented during a conversation between Hazel and George. George compares competition to the dark ages by saying “If I tried to get away with it, then other people'd get away with it—and pretty soon we’d be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else.

Separation of Powers Initially, the Constitution’s first way to prevent majority rule is the tripartite division of power in the national government. This is also known as separation of power. The national government is split into three powers or branches. The Constitution lists these branches as the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. Each branch has its own certain powers.

Federalists knew that another self-governing government would only lead to a weak system just like the Articles lead them to failure. Thomas R. Frazier said, “View these things, fellow citizens, and then say that we do not require a new, a protecting, and efficient federal government if you can.” (Doc #1) Frazier is stating that America is in great need of a federal government, that they need educated and knowledgeable people to lead their country. He also means that in order to maintain their freedom and independence they would need a government to protect their rights they fought for. Creating three branches to avoid congress from becoming too powerful and keep everything under control was a much better way than having just one branch like in the Articles of Confederation.

“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.

They wanted a new form of government that gave power to the people, states, and the federal government. But most importantly, they wanted a government that would prevent tyranny. After 3½ months, they came up with the Constitution. It was meant to establish a Federalist government, spread out power between 3 different branches of government, put in place a system of checks and balances, and give states equal and proportionate

Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption. And, stated by ClearPictureOnline.com,”Guns don 't kill people, people do. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law.” (Shootout: Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations?) What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control.

Would Stricter Gun Control Laws Benefit America? The highly debatable question has flooded the minds of Americans. It is continued to be argued throughout America.

Where the weapons were obtained in the sandy hook shooting and the Orlando shooting were dramatically different. Lanza took the weapons from his mother who owned them legally, but Lanza was unable to have firearms because of his mental illness. Mateen was cleared by the federal background check even though the FBI did some monitoring on him. His radical beliefs caught the eye of the federal government, but someone 's religion can not be used to stip individuals of their rights. Lastly he explains that, “cultural beliefs are significantly related to people’s opinions about gun control, but the strongest, most consistent predictors of people’s gun control preferences are their political beliefs and affiliations,” (Wozniak 2).