Many families who are considered poor in society don’t have the same equality of education like the wealthy. Students has no choice to make the best of public schools because their parent’s choose to live in poor areas. Students shouldn’t be limited to high performance standards schools because the inequality of education. Many students that attend public schools are motivated to continue education so they can become successful and have higher socioeconomic status. Comparing to the rich, students who have higher education because parents live in wealthy cities to attend schools with enrichment programs and classes. Most of the students who come from wealthy have more support of their child’s education to brighten and assure their future. …show more content…
Residents that live in cities with poor economics receive less school funding; on the other hand residents that lives in wealthy cities receive more money. Money is being unequally distributed to the public schools, which is unfair to those who live in poor areas. For an example, public schools in Beverly Hills receive more funding than schools in Compton due to wealth. States and local governments contribute to public school funding’s but, the most monetary impact are by public tax. For an instance, cities that are in middle or poor class usually spent less than richer cities whom have high tax rate. Schools with higher academic performance receive the most financial disbursement. . According to Dennis Condron a Sociologist of Educations states, “At the state level, more than half of the states spend less per student in low-income and heavily minority districts than they spend in high-income and predominantly white districts” (295). The most people who are benefiting from education finances are whites and it’s an inequality because everyone deserves equal funding’s no matter their socioeconomic status. Funding education gets distributed unequal to schools in the same city because it depends on the schools performance. An example of this inequality can be public schools in Whittier; whichever high school has higher performance receives more funds. (Missing a quote and a wrap …show more content…
Public schools who are not equally funded have limited programs to help students give higher education. Public schools in poor areas don’t have enough money to cover basic programs such as tutoring, summer schools, Advancement placement and other learning programs. Students that live in middle class area have some of these programs but its not enough for educational growth. In comparison to the wealthy schools they have same programs but since their wealthier school they’re able to put more money in the programs than other socioeconomic class and open programs to help enrich learning. High quality programs should be applied to all students who attend school because they all go for a success dream and by limiting programs it takes away the right for successful education. Although sports its not part of education, students do better when playing a sport that they enjoy. Another cause of inequality is buildings from poor cities schools are rusted and old. In comparison to rich public schools have new buildings, desk, or classrooms. All schools should have the right for their school to be a welcoming clean environment. Furthermore, teachers are being unequally underpaid, Dennis Condron says, “Conversely, high-poverty schools are staffed by less experienced and lower-paid teachers” (294). All public schools should be able to hire experienced qualified
To no one’s surprise, most Americans are aware that education is a necessity in life. Not only does it allow one to further their knowledge, but it can offer freedom from anything holding them back, like poverty. A bar graph statistic from the Congressional Budget Office found that people with their Master’s degree between ages of 45-54 years old make $130,000, whereas high school graduates between the same ages only make about $70,000 (Dent). Even though America offers some of the best education in the world, many do not realize the impact that social class has on one’s education. Whereas most other nations fund their schools equally, America spends much more on the more affluent districts.
“The intent behind closing these gaps is to break the connection between race or family income and achievement while at the same time continuing to improve the performance of the top students. ”(28) Gaps between race and wealth have always been issues in schools. Historically, children living in poverty are more likely to score lower on tests than those
These results should not be surprising. When the goal is to reduce property taxes, there is a good chance politicians will decrease taxes and school funding overall as adding offsetting taxes would seem at cross-purposes with the reduction in property taxes. However, when the goal is to increase equality and help all students succeed, politicians will seek out additional funds to support schools currently near the bottom. At the least, they won’t reduce overall funding in support of equality. Moreover, almost 25 years after reform, Michigan schools are still funded unequally (and won’t be equal for another 20 years at the current rate).
In Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools, Jonathan Kozol exploits extreme inequalities between the schools in East St. Louis and Morris High in Rye, New York in the 1990s. The living conditions in East St. Louis were deplorable. There was no trash collection service, the sewage system was dysfunctional, and crime, illness, poverty, and pollution ran rampant. The schools in East St. Louis had a predominately black student population, and the buildings were extremely obsolete, with lab equipment that was outdated by thirty to fifty years, a football field without goalposts, sports uniforms held together by patches, and a plumbing system that repeatedly spewed sewage. In addition, there was a substantial lack of funds that prevented
The word poverty derives from the Latin word paupertāt, which means moderate circumstances. Such a definition best describes the situation for millions of young American students. Throughout American history, poverty and education have gone hand-in-hand for many students. From getting picked on for how the person is dressed (Carson & Murphy, 2011), to not receiving the proper funding need to create a quality school (Gonzales, 2016), the life of an impoverished student is no joking matter.
In the article, The Resegregation of Jefferson County, a wide variety of different sociological aspects are portrayed under the fight to separate the school, Gardendale, from the rest of the Jefferson County school system. Multiple different inequalities are discussed in different forms throughout this article specifically including income, institutional racism, and neo-racism. All of these forms of social stratification are still alive today. Social stratification is described as “inequalities among individuals and groups within human societies. (Giddens, Duneier, Applebaum, Carr, p. 194)”
Basing school funding on property tax leads to unequal opportunities and environments for students, even though the government may claim it is not up to them, there needs to be a drastic change. Currently, taxes collected from the surrounding communities fund public school districts. Public schools get financed mainly by the property tax of the surrounding houses. “Resources available to school districts relied heavily on local property wealth, and property wealth per pupil varied greatly, as it continues today”
Children who grow up in high crime, poverty-stricken neighborhoods may face numerous challenges that can make it difficult to succeed in school. In “How Illinois Pays For Public Schools” by Becky Vevea she states “We don’t have full-time art and music at the elementary level, says superintendent Kevin Russell. Instead, what we do is, for half of the year the students get art, and the other half of the year the students get music. It’s just one example of what a school can or can’t do with roughly $9,794 per student”(Vevea, 1). This school demonstrates how the geography of where these students are impacts their education because their school just can’t afford to give them the luxuries that other schools can because they just don’t get the same funding based on where they are located.
The taxes that come from East St. Louis are not enough to sustain the amount of schools that are in the district, and therefore account for the conditions of the schools. However, just across the bridge live more affluent and educated adults who pay more into taxes to assure that their children have a safe, healthy, and stimulating environment in which to attend school each day. The children comment on how unfair this system has become for the children of East St. Louis. One girl states that the government of the state
I was amazed to read that in the affluent school, some of the children mention they will rather not be rich. Rich meant that they could not work and they will rather work since they liked working. In the executive school, I was bothered by the comment that a teacher stated. A teacher associated low-income children with discipline problems. I think that teacher generalized an observation he
Martha Peraza SOC 3340 Inequality in Education California State University, Bakersfield Abstract In the United States, there exists a gap in equality for different demographics of students. The factors contributing to educational disadvantages include socioeconomic struggles, gender of students, language or culture, and particularly for the scope of this paper, race.
People dream of freedom. A freedom that can bestow opportunities, a freedom that can establish equality, and a freedom that can promote success—people dream of the American dream. Many pursue it believing that education is the primary pathway to achieving success, and through education and hard work they can lower barriers; thus, being capable of scaling upward in the social ladder. Sadly, this dream has been tainted by myths that are associated with education. For example, some people claim that education is the grand equalizer of society, so through proper schooling everyone has the same chance of move up the social ladder.
School funding is also based on the school population size. Why should newer schools with high income students get to have a lot more resources then the other schools with low income students. Why is it that lower income schools aren’t given the same resources to help the students? These students with low income do have the same opportunity as the higher income new schools. A lot of those students don’t have access to internet or even have a ride for transportation.
Although, many options exist and no matter where you stand on the issue on how to educate our youth or children, all the funding should exist even more so in our public schools especially in the early years pre-k and kindergarten or elementary school students. This is so important because even if people are all for charter schools, private schools or home schools; those special students will eventually have to work and live next to majority of the students who went through public schools and it is very important that the public school kids get the absolute best guidance through their early years. If we do not give them everything we got we will end up with many problems. The problems we will have are not just people who have low reading and math skills but also potentially people who have low self-esteem and have many different mental problems. Public school funding goes beyond simply reading, writing, and math.
As Americans, we view the Constitution as a stepping stone to making the great country we live in today. Yet, we the people of the United States failed to realize another component in order to form a perfect union. Which is to establish and promote equal opportunities for a quality education for all. However, we live in a society where social locators such as class, gender, and race are huge factors in the determination of one’s educational future.