ipl-logo

The Influence Of Fortune In Machiavelli's The Prince

981 Words4 Pages

There is distinct ways a great political leader can be defined by the influence on human affairs; by ruling fearlessly with no morality, and being able to possess fortune. World affairs are controlled by the divine power and fortune, and that is what this chapter denotes, Machiavelli is aware that no amount of human wisdom can change that. Being aware that the notion of divine power and fortune are the factors that rule political issues also illuminates the idea that fortune is responsible to a certain degree, for either the failure or success that men have encountered with. At the beginning of the chapter Machiavelli states that fortune tends to predispose an individual’s actions, they can be influenced to a certain extent, …show more content…

When Machiavelli wrote the letter to Francesco Vettori, he discusses his vast knowledge and experience on political affairs and stated the relevancy amongst each issue. It all interrelates by displaying the distinct political ideologies and contrasting the positive and negative traits that a ruler should obtain. The idea that it shows to readers is that power can be given to any leader but obtaining glory gives that leader immortality and lives on in generations, which is the greatest success a ruler can achieve. Therefore Machiavelli mentions an analogy on fortune being a woman it can be fragile, attractive, and easy to seduce; but to be mastered completely a ruler must apply force and violence portray himself as ruthless to surrender. No matter the vast knowledge or skills of a ruler if acted upon impulsive decisions will be his downfall, for example Julius by doing so actions he achieved nothing if it weren’t for Julius arranging alliances. Machiavelli demonstrates how fortune is obtained and the difficulty it is to maintain it, creating rational decisions and acting accordingly in the moment of war is what creates a glorious

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Machiavelli's The Prince And Julius Caesar

    1120 Words  | 5 Pages

    Machiavelli talks about how power in a state can best be achieved. The purpose of his novel is to provide readers with a knowledge of how to take over and maintain control of a region. Machiavelli states there are different ways to rise and hold power successfully, and he discusses many different ways to govern a

    Read More

  • The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Niccolo Machiavelli's book, The Prince (1513), he evaluates on how a prince can be a successful leader. Machiavelli’s purpose of this guidebook was to construct his argument to the rising ruler Giuliano de Medici for when he comes to power in Florence. He adopts a casual but authoritative tone in order to convince the prince that Machiavelli’s evaluation on how to be the best prince, is the right thing for the prince to do without coming off as he knows more than the prince or is trying to intimidate him.. Machiavelli’s reference to previous rulers and whether their tactics failed or succeeded helps to benefit his credibility along with his allusion to historic text. He appeals to our logic by simply stating a prince can only do what is within his power to control, and his use of an analogy furthers his argument.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Pizan And Machiavelli The Prince

    1056 Words  | 5 Pages

    Then for Machiavelli he talks about how a prince should show no fear instead for him to show that he is the one with power. That a prince's people should fear him. Both authors go on to talk on how their people react based on the prince and princesse act. The authors then go on to explain how they should view and run their people. Both authors also reflect the fact that the way their people are going to act towards them is mainly based off of how they treat them.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson And Niccolo Machiavelli's The Morals Of The Prince

    762 Words  | 4 Pages

    Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the

    Read More

  • Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Devices

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    Machiavelli begins by crafting an analogy, which serves to expound on his sentiment that a ruler must know how to govern both beast and man, and in governing beast a ruler must know when “to choose the fox and the lion” (Machiavelli ch.18). Machiavelli details how it is necessary for a ruler to have traits of both the lion and the fox, as the fox “knows how to recognize traps, and the lion [knows how] to aw the wolves” (Machiavelli ch.18). The analogy compounds on the necessity of a well-rounded ruler and serves to exemplify the core philosophy that Machiavelli is suggesting – that it is necessary for a ruler to know how best to deal with a situation at

    Read More

  • First Global Age Analysis

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    The main point made by Machiavelli was that men are inherently bad, so a leader must rule in a way that takes this into account. He taught that because of man’s ungratefulness, it is safer to be feared than loved (D-4). This shows that Machiavelli believed that the power and success of a country will lead to the prosperity of its inhabitants. Both influential people believed that a country prospers the most under absolute power.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Niccólo Machiavelli's The Prince

    1519 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the book, Machiavelli believes in the idea of having a strong dominant leader, in order to preserve the benefits to the citizens as a group instead of individually. This strategy clearly shows in chapter seventeen where Machiavelli points out that every prince would prefer to be loved than to be feared. However, the two rarely co-existed. If one had to choose, it is not only better to be feared than to be loved but it is also much “safer” looking at it realistically. By safer, it means that you will not have to worry and watch out as much since people will be less likely to conspire against someone they fear than someone they love.

    Read More

  • Qualities Of A Good Man In Machiavelli's The Prince

    1284 Words  | 6 Pages

    A leader’s cruelty enables him to make the decisions necessary for the kingdom, while also being miserly to keep the people happy. I think that Machiavelli’s advice provides a sound basis on how leaders today can lead. On other hand, others may argue that Machiavelli’s advice leads rulers astray and rather rulers should be kind and generous because morally that is the right thing to do. No matter the interpretation of how a ruler should lead, Machiavelli's analyst of a leaders provides insight into everyday life and causes leaders today to think about how they

    Read More

  • Boethius Vs Machiavelli

    2271 Words  | 10 Pages

    The Ancient-modern debate involves two main tenets and philosophers Boethius and Niccolo Machiavelli and both have extremely different and even contradictory views of politics and whether morality comes into play and how. Boethius covers the classical side of the debate where he gets some of his ideas from other philosophers in the classical rea like Plato and Socrates. Niccolo Machiavelli covers the modern aspect of the debate. Both speak on similar themes like the conception of happiness, the role of “Lady Fortuna” or Fortune and politics. The ancient or classical view of in the Ancient modern debate of human nature is that humans are naturally good and naturally political.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    His mindset was simple. to manifest dismay and use the overwhelming power as a dictator. His intentions are clear, and his words are powerful. With a combination of rhetorical devices, a symphony of teachings are made and preached. Machiavelli is a strong advocate to use fear to herd together the common man, he begins his argument by asking a simple question, “ Here the question… safer than to be loved”.

    Read More

  • Erasmus Vs Machiavelli

    1034 Words  | 5 Pages

    Machiavelli believed that men will follow a ruler as long as the ruler serves their interests, and a quick to turn against the ruler unless they fear great punishment. Machiavelli would say that it is best to be feared rather than loved as long as the fear does not cause hate, which he believed to be perfectly possible.

    Read More

  • Plato Vs Machiavelli

    429 Words  | 2 Pages

    He believes anyone can rule a polis if they have virtu. Once a ruler, a simple rule to follow to maintain power and not to be hated by the people, is to “not take away a man’s possession or woman”, Machiavelli believes the people will not feel threaten by following this rule, thus maintaining a stable polis. He expresses how “human nature never changes”, and that people are self-interested and they can turn against you once you are not profiting them. A good ruler must have the strength to do whatever it takes to obtain and maintain power, which essentially means that even if they have to hurt some of the people for the benefit of the popular mass, then they shall do so for the greater cause. Both Plato and Machiavelli believe that there must be a government in order for human kind to survive.

    Read More

  • The Failure Of Leadership In Machiavelli's The Prince

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Prince, written by Machiavelli, is a candid outline of how he believes leaders gain and keep power. Machiavelli uses examples of past leaders to determine traits that are necessary to rule successfully. Leaders such as the King of Naples and the Duke of Milan lacked military power, made their subjects hate them, or did not know how to protect themselves from the elite, causing them to lose power. He says that these rulers should blame laziness, not luck, for their failures. By looking at these historical successes and failures, Machiavelli is able to develop his own thoughts on how politics and leaders should be in the future.

    Read More

  • The Principles Of Leadership In The Prince By Machiavelli

    1238 Words  | 5 Pages

    Probably one of the most infamous and controversial ideologies of the 16th century, the prince by Machiavelli has been a reference for many great leaders and academicians since it was published. The book provides historically tested and proven principles of leadership. The prince has been described as a manual for those who want to win and retain power. While some may argue that leadership is an inherent trait in human, leaders are made, not born. Making a great leader out of a person is not just a matter of identifying the leadership traits, skill and talents of the individual, but harnessing the traits, develop them and eventually mastering how to be leader.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli: The Characteristics Of Being A Good Prince

    1526 Words  | 7 Pages

    This is a work that still influences us today and is still relevant in today’s complex society. Some of the most prominent leaders of the 20th century have been influenced by Machiavellian ideas. U.S Presidents like Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton and U.K Prime Minister Anthony Blair are called Machiavellian leaders today. According to Machiavelli a prince must focus all his serious time and energy to war and how to wage it (Machiavelli, 31).

    Read More

More about The Influence Of Fortune In Machiavelli's The Prince

Open Document