Maummar Gaddafi became the leader of Libya in 1970 after he planned a coup which succeeded him to overthrow King Idris, the former ruler of Libya, and his government thus leaving Gaddafi in power. Gaddafi rejected modern democracy and favoured more a ‘direct democracy’ he went about leading Libya as a dictatorship where he had absolute power and control over the country and its people. Advice from other people concerning Libya would not have taken any preference to Gaddafi as he was known to be the ‘top guy” therefore he knew as well as the public that he was the only one who had the ability to call the shots. Gaddafi aided to Libya in many ways, which hugely impacted Libya, such as trying to reconstruct and transform Libya as a whole and to …show more content…
Gaddafi contributed a lot into to the development of Libya and played a pivotal role in being politically involved but his impulsive, reckless and inhuman behaviour supports the idea that Gaddafi was to an extent indeed the villain people perceived him to be. Gaddafi was and is still being judged to be a “tyrant” as well a negative iconic leader. This judgement arose from his acts of greediness, violence and selfishness. The word tyrant is used to describe an unfit leader, this term is usually used from the public whom is suffering under the leadership or other people who have been exposed to these tyrannical ways i.e. the outside world through means of media. This suggests that when the term was directed toward Gaddafi it came from the voice of the public. This implies that the public had negative views of Gaddafi as a leader and they did not favour the …show more content…
Libya under Gaddafi’s rule achieved great things, “Gaddafi had turned Libya into Africa’s wealthiest nation. Libya had the highest GDP per capita and the life expectancy on the continent”. Gaddafi offered countless propositions which helped the country’s reputation as Libya was noticed to be revolutionized enough to compete with other countries which also helped better the lives of the people, “Under Gaddafi’s rule, Libyans enjoyed not only free health-care and free education, but also free electricity and interest-free loans”. Gaddafi’s interest and attempt in introducing new policies benefited in the public’s interest which worked in Gaddafi’s favour as the public started to support his ideas. Gaddafi showed interest in outside world activities concerning political issues, this created a sincere image of Gaddafi as he had the ability to focus on issues outside of Libya, it also exposes his support toward freedom as well as freedom fighters (G), “Muammar Gaddafi also went onto establish ‘Libyan Revolutionary Committees’ to raise political awareness amongst the people and supported a variety of freedom struggles around the world...”. In the same year that the British government branded Nelson Mandela a terrorist, Col. Gaddafi declared him to be, (G) “the only legitimate leader in South
An autobiography, of which Ishmael Beah unwillingly becomes a child solider due to a civil war that has arisen in Sierra Leone. Before the attacks had happen, Ishmael and his elder brother Junior had gone from home to perform Rap in Mattru Jong with their friends. Not long after their arrival, news of the rebels had come to their attention having raided their home town and no sign of their families being unscarred from the warfare. Ishmael, and his group of friends sought out to travel to each village seeking out their family. However trouble comes across due to the majority of RUF rebel attacks were caused by children around their age, many villagers had no trust for these kids.
This war was fought between Muammar Gaddafi, the former leader of Libya, and his loyal forces versus those wanting to overthrow his government (Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Libya revolt of 2011). Gaddafi had refused to step down, and had been using violence against protestors and demonstrators to remain in power (Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Libya revolt of 2011). Deaths and injuries were increasing by the thousands catching the attention of the intercontinental crowd, which compelled NATO to answer the United Nations’ call to the international community to protect the Libyan people (NATO, NATO and Libya). A coalition of NATO allies and partners intervened on March 21st, 2011 with the intention of defending civilians against attacks by the government 's forces (NATO, NATO and Libya). This operation was under the command of Canada’s Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, who helped enforce an arms embargo and no-fly zone policy (Government of Canada, NATO operations).
Tyranny has been prevalent throughout history with leaders such as Kim Jong-Il, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler. All of these dictators shared a group of traits. The most recognizable characteristic of a tyrannical rule is fear of the ruler. Dictators often maintain a higher class than the people they rule, leaving the citizens poor. More often than not, tyrants are not voted into power.
¨The leader¨ elected himself to lead the pack of killers, which wasn't the right thing many people disagreed with the Reign of Terror and
Some would like to argue that it was actually his Hussein’s realization that such power existed that corrupted him. They think that he wishes to return Iraq to a historical age of glory. But the real history that is important is that of the beginning of his life. In the essay Bowden recounts an interview with a journalist named Saad al-Bazzaz in which al-Bazzaz discusses the root of all of this evil.
And in response Simonides argues that there are some ways that the tyrant can redeem himself and get the love and attention that he craves and tries to advice him and show him these ways. In general, tyrants are sovereign rulers who rule over unwilling subjects by force. They have control over almost everything and everyone in the state, meaning there is no consideration for law. Tyrants always think of themselves
The first tyrant was Peisistratus, a lawyer, who had two previous failed attempts to install himself before succeeding. He was supported by the well-being of the poor and the landowners as well as clients and maintained popularity through funding festivals and public programs, which ties into the answer for the previous question. His position was known as in equation with that of emperor; however, with the growth of democracy, the title of ‘tyrant’ became negative, and its popularity and usefulness decreased from there. As a tyrant was a person who seized power unlawfully or inherited it, became a popular occupation as the monarchy structure became unpopular and birth aristocratic regimes, which, themselves, became unpopular.
1984 Paper Over the course of human history, tyrants have always existed. No matter what continent or race of people, evil leaders have existed. One such leader like this was Muammar Gaddafi. Gaddafi, born June 7, 1942, ruled the North African country of Libya for over 42 years.
Two such dictators were the infamous Adolf Hitler and the Soviet Union’s Stalin. Both ruled with an iron fist and demanded full support of their system whether they used terror or plain appeal. Totalitarianism,
Introduction Human history is abundant in examples of individuals who have amassed such power with themselves that have allowed them to control entire populations, and often unleash tyranny and oppression upon millions of people. Throughout history there have been individuals who have held an iron grip over entire nations, concentrating totalitarian power with themselves, denying any freedom to people, crushing any form of dissent, and often unleashing mass violence, terror, and in some cases genocide. These people have shaped the future of peoples, regions and continents, starting wars and conflicts, and determining the course of millions of lives. And because of this very fact, that a single person could such a huge impact over the lives of so many people, it is very important to study the very factors that caused these individuals to make the decisions that they did, specifically, the factors and that shaped up the personality of these
Fascism by definition is a form of government which included an authoritarian and nationalistic system of government as well as social organization. In further explanation it is a form of government in which a dictator or emperor ultimately controls the government, the people are subjected to following the orders of their dictator or they will suffer the consequences. Despite the authoritarian style of government there are plenty uses for implanting this style of government. Various countries have utilized this, as well as it being one of the driving forces persuading those other countries to implement this form of government. Some countries who implemented this way of thinking was Japan, Germany, and.
Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro were dictators famous for their communist ideology and violent reigns while totalitarian dictators. Defined by Dictionary.com, Totalitarianism is “absolute control by the state or a governing branch of a highly centralized institution” and a dictator is “a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.” Dictators are usually stern, but passionate in front of the public. Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro both came to rise in environments that were challenging politically, economically, socially or all of the above. They offered another light that people were desperate to see.
Davidson makes reference to Idi Amin of Uganda as well as Jean-Bédel Bokassa of the Central African Republic, who both are examples of leaders who mirrored the actions of their colonial predecessors. Their rule was similar to that of European colonizers in that they thrived off of the inequality of Africans and took part in lavish celebrations while the majority of their country remained poor. While some believe this corruption is due to some innate greed possessed solely by Africans, a look into history tells you that modern day African rulers have simply just inherited and embraced the lifestyle of the European rules before them, which unfortunately included the massive hoarding of wealth. This hoarding of wealth did not come without any opposition however, which brings about the next theme of dictatorship and how rulers such as Bokassa and Amin maintained their positions of power through the crushing of dissent. The suppression of protests was done through the torture and murder of anyone who criticized, which is exactly how the European colonizers ruled out any opposition and another example of the brutal legacies of
The next source gathered was an internet source written by a reputable and reliable author Ali Mazrui. Unlike most other sources on Amin that focus on his life, this source focuses on how people perceive Amin. Mazrui notes that westerners see him as entirely brutal and evil whereas, “for much of the third world, Amin … had that dialectical quality of heroic evil” (Prof Ali Mazrui, 2012). She goes on to note that Ugandans saw him as a black nationalist and that Ugandans don’t believe in most of the brutal stories about Amin as they see it as biased western media. Although Mazrui is far more positive about Amin than most sources she does mention many of the atrocities he committed which provides the source with more credibility and reliability.
As a transformational leader I have chosen Nelson Mandela due to the fact that he motivates his followers to accomplish through charisma and inspiration. Nelson Mandela is a well knows leader who is loved not only by his own people, but to people around the world because he fought for South Africa during apartheid time. Nelson Mandela inspired his followers to work toward extremely intimidating accomplishments like ending apartheid in South Africa. The transformational style examine how certain leaders are able to motivate followers by inspiring and empowering them towards achieving a common vision through their obligation.