The French and Indian War was important to the American Revolution because the debt from the war was the reason that Parliament started taxing the colonists. Also, the French and Indian War made Britain very weak, making the colonists’ actions work a whole lot better. Since France was not happy with the outcome of their war with Britain this was a main reasons for France’s interest in helping the now Americans throughout the Revolutionary War, which was very important to the colonies’ victory. The reason why Britain started to tax the colonists was because of the debt resulting from the French and Indian War. The first tax was the the tax on sugar, which was put on the colonists to help pay off the war debt.
According to Dadabhai Naoroji’s article, “The Benefits of British Rule for India”, the Indians/natives had no voice in the taxes, legislations, or were qualified to earn the position of a court judge or high-ranking government official. The society the British constructed blocked the Indians out, and openly disregarded their opinions and desire for change and equality. Some may claim that the British modernized their country by reforming the natives education system, and implementing new innovations and technological advancements, like railroads to improve transportation within the country. However, according to the article written by Professor Peter Marshall titled, “The British Presence in India in the 18th Century,” the majority of these systems primarily focused on English and Western ideas, rather than their own distinctive culture. The traditional ideas and beliefs focusing on theory and methodology, that were implemented into their previous education system, were then modified to a practical approach, forcing their pre-existing system to slowly descend into oblivion.
To pay off the debt, the British Parliament began to enforce new acts and taxes on the colonies (Doc I). Many acts placed on the colonies were not very harmful to the colonies; some even reduced the price of certain goods. However, the Parliament was passing new laws and acts without consensus of the colonies (Doc G). This caused uproar in many of the colonies demanding to have representation within the British Parliament. A group of colonist called the Sons of Liberty came together to fight against taxation without representation and for their rights as citizens of Great Britain.
The Articles of Confederation provided the United States with a predominantly ineffective government that could not deal with problems at home and abroad. The country was unable to regulate commerce and effectively deal with foreign nations from 1781 to 1789. Although there were some advantages to the first constitution, the issues caused by the document greatly outweighed the benefits. The Articles of Confederation limited America’s ability to deal problems within its own borders and with foreign nations. The United States, under the Articles of Confederation, did not have the ability to properly deal with the problems arising within the borders of the country.
In his opinion, the government was violating the citizens’ rights. Britain was forcing the colonists to house the British soldiers and there was no compensation. The British government also violated the colonist’s rights by restricting trade by preventing other nations from purchasing products form the North American colonial market. Obviously, the Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling because the British government was taking advantage of the colonists. Parliament applied various taxes, and forced the colonists to house British soldiers which violated the rights of the colonists.
The American colonists were done being treated like they were still part of Great Britain. The people of Boston were being forced to pay taxes that went to Great Britain. These taxes would only be helping the British, and the American colonists believed that they had no reason to pay them. This forced
The American Revolution was not justified because the Patriots were not justified to rebel by what they based their justification on, which was British “tyranny.” The colonists reaped many benefits under the British Empire, and some of these benefits prove that the Patriots were unjust to act violently because they did not receive advantages as British subjects. When the colonists moved to America, one of the main goals in mind for the British was to live out the theory of mercantilism. Mercantilism is the belief that if a nation could produce something desirable that couldn’t be produced in other lands, then that nation could make their trade profitable. By colonizing America, the British would be able to access an abundance of resources in
Edmund Burke discloses his reluctance to change in his Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents, by arguing the previous government structure outdoes the current one. Specifically, from the Glorious Revolution in 1688 throughout the reign of George II of Hanover (House of Brunswick as stated by Burke), personal ties and private connections governed the country in what Burke called “the most fortunate periods of our history” (Burke 529). At the same time, the Parlement of Paris also exhibits objection to the current policies of the government as it outlines oppositions to the new tax within the framework of the Remonstrance against the Edict Suppressing Obligatory Labor. Although both parties argue against reforms and changes taking place in the country and believe in the power of the upper class and nobility, Edmund Burke proves more reluctant to change through his complete dismissal of reforms, compared to the Parlement of Paris and their insistence on implementation of new strategies.
This is the view that slavery could only be abolished when the economics of slavery lost out the economics of wage labour in terms of productivity and cost, meaning that the call for abolishing slavery gathered momentum when it was no more opposed by vested interests . For Eric Williams, the slave economies indeed declined in profitability and importance to England after the American Revolution War, and, therefore, abolition of the slave trade and emancipation of the slaves in the British West Indies were driven not by moral considerations but by economic motives within England . However, using available data for the period between 1770 and 1820, Seymour Drescher argues that there was no such decline – instead, this was a period of expansion and prosperity for the West Indian colonies and there is no correlation between either long- or short-term economic trends and the abolition of the slave trade; he claims that economic decline was the consequence and not the cause of abolition . Similarly, David Eltis argues that the ‘natural limits’ of slavery were nowhere in sight at any point in the nineteenth century, many of the supposed stresses observed within slave economies being primarily consequences of slave trade abolition, rather than contradictions between slavery and economic growth
America’s search for independence began after its colonial citizens became upset about the trade regulations and taxation imposed by the British Empire. They sought to be their own sovereign nation, separate from the monarchy headed by King George. The colonialist no longer felt they could prosper under the overbearing rule of one man or woman, so they began their fight for independence. Although the overall political struggle began in 1765, the American Revolutionary War began in 1775 and ended in 1783. Following the war and after the colonialists gained their hard earned independence, they wanted to create a governmental system that did not oppress its citizens, so they wrote the United States Constitution in 1787.
Salutary neglect was a colonial policy in which England relaxed its enforcement of most regulations in return for the continued economic loyalty of the colonies. As long as raw materials kept flowing into the homeland and the colonists continued to buy English-produced goods, Parliament did not supervise the colonies closely. The colonists were able to influence the king-appointed governors, from the approval of laws to the appointment of judges, since the colonial-assembly paid the governors’ salaries and not the king. It was because of their influence with the governors that they were able to develop a taste for self-government that would eventually create the conditions for rebellion.
Analyze British taxation policy and explain how it contributed to the American decision to start the American Revolution. In the beginning, British taxation policies were not exactly stringent on the colonists. Prior to any military conflicts in America, the colonists paid little in taxes and in their economic activity, they were free of worry about the British government and its need for funds. Any military conflicts bring postwar results, for which few parties prepare for, including devastation to land and loss of human life, but specifically those industries that thrive while providing some of the military weapons and equipment, their articles are not in demand anymore. Debt increased while the demand for this articles decreased, creating
The role of a leader is to support and consider what will benefit their people, however, this does not always happen. British colonists left their mother country because they disagreed with the ruling and wanted to be independent of a king. Although separated by an ocean, the colonies were still supported and indirectly ruled by Britain. The British government took advantage of North American resources and cheated the colonists out of their money by placing restrictions of trade and taxing necessary goods.
Britain was only interested in exploiting the country and didn’t care much for its citizens. The British controlled Nigeria by using authoritarian systems and by being unafraid to use force and fear to keep the Nigerians under control. The British never allowed the Nigerians to have rights within the colony that would allow them to have power or to make political decisions. The British also used indirect rule in Nigeria to prevent resistance from the local people and to save on the cost of running a government. Nigeria has two rivers, Niger and
The causes of American Revolution can be summarized into several factors. The first cause was British imposed its mercantilist monopoly authority to suppress colonies’ economic opportunity after the French-Indian War. Mercantilist discourages trade as the source of the wealth to manage the empire and its colonies. For most the parts are the Merchant class played an important role in the Parliament to make sure the colonies served the interest of British government and the merchant class. American Colonies played the role of providing raw materials and the transportation of processed goods in the triangle trade route, in return for the empire’s military protection.