ipl-logo

The Influence Of William Sumner's Ideas On Society

429 Words2 Pages

William Sumner's ideas on society were similar to those of Spencer's. He had two social principles that apply to society. The first is the law of survival of the fittest, where only the strongest species will survive to reproduce. The second is the competition of life, which is the struggle for people to survive among each other. Although his principles are similar to Spencer's, he did believe people should get some help from the government. "He did, unlike Spencer, favor public education... and he also favored efforts to improve the conditions of women and children at work" (Boller 57). This was all the public help Sumner favored. Anything more than this would be socialistic, which is any force that enables people to avoid the struggles for the existence in life. Furthermore, Sumner explains that giving the poor advantages in society would be wrong. "To …show more content…

The only way to avoid this would be to take from the rich and give to the poor. Still, this is wrong because the poor would not know how to use power, and they do not deserve it. It would destroy liberty by taking fit people's deserved wealth, and would create more equality. This is why like Spencer, Sumner also believed the poor should be left off to die. "Sumner shed no tears over the lot of the poor and underprivileged; they were where they were because of what they were... Nature is working away at him to get him out of the way" (58). Sumner thought there were two ways in which society would progress immensely. The first would be by getting rid of the poor, which would benefit us greatly since there would be more room for fit people. The second is by giving people a little help in life to see how far they can get on their own. This will force people to work hard, and allow them to be prudent and wise so they can raise their children in a similar way. Sumner's ideal society would be one where there was little help from the government so only the most fit people would

Show More
Related

  • Apush Dbq Industrialization

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    Consequently, many rich Americans believed in this view, and used it as an explanation of why some are poor and some are rich. Additionally, a similar view is expressed in Progress & Poverty, written by J.M Dent. (Doc. 11). In Progress & Poverty, Dent explains that an uneven distribution of wealth will aid social progress, because it will drive people to work harder, which in almost all cases, never worked, and only caused social unrest and strikes. Conversely, some politicians fought for workers’ rights and developed legislation in response.

    Read More

  • Compare Harrison Bergeron And The Lottery By Shirley Jackson

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    Individuals are the building blocks of society, but they can’t dictate the way society flows. In the short stories “The Lottery,” by Shirley Jackson and “Harrison Bergeron,” by Kurt Vonnegut, and the theories of enlightenment philosophers, individuals can not change society. Tessie Hutchinson from “The Lottery,” tried to persuade her village that the tradition was wrong, but she faced death. While, Harrison from “Harrison Bergeron,” tried to overthrow society's ideas, through atrocious actions. The philosophers believed that the governors of society should be responsive and secure rights for the people.

    Read More

  • Confronting Inequality Summary

    933 Words  | 4 Pages

    Income inequality The article “Confronting Inequality,” written by Paul Krugman, a professor at Princeton University, emphasizes that the middle class suffers from social inequality and economic inequality. Krugman suggests building a stronger safety net so the gap between the poor and rich can be limited to by raising of the taxes. Krugman uses this claim to highlight the fact that the middle class needs to be stronger and the only way to achieve that is to have a strong safety net. Krugman says the rich use loopholes in the tax system to cheat their way out of high taxes, and the poor pay a relatively high tax compared to what they should be paying.

    Read More

  • Democrats Vs Federalists Essay

    480 Words  | 2 Pages

    Currently, we have both a wealthy class and common people rule. Everyone (common people) gets to vote, and those votes decide our future. But, because of their wealthy, the wealthy have an advantage when it comes to politics. They can pay a lot for the best lawyer (the best example being the OJ Simpson case) and be proven innocent because the lawyer raised reasonable doubt. Also, wealthy business owners could get the government to move a smaller business/store, using eminent domain, and place their own business at the location, using the words “public use” to tell the people it was for them.

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie Is Not A Hero Essay

    454 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie could have let his employees keep their wages and worry about donations later. Taking money away to invest it somewhere else is not helping, because the people

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Where I Lived And What I Live For

    578 Words  | 3 Pages

    He urges people to live simply and warns against the difference between “essentials” and just extra “stuff.” As he says, “Our life is frittered away by detail. ” We focus so much on the future and all the silly distractions going on around us, that we lose sight of what is really important. He believed we don’t need as much technology, for example. Also, we could live off of one meal a day instead of three or four.

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of William Graham Sumner's Criticism

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    Analysis of William Graham Sumner’s Criticism Sumner begins his essay with a definition of criticism and states that “criticism is the examination and test of propositions of any kind which are offered for acceptance, in order to find out whether they correspond to reality or not” (Sumner 632). In his definition he argues a proposition can not only be examined but also tested before been accepted, and the proposition can be of any nature no matter how good or bad people believe the topic can be. It is important to discover if the proposition relates to reality and not to an idealistic or abstract idea. He claims that “the critical faculty is a product of education and training” (632). The capacity to analyze and be critical is a vital quality that does not come naturally, so people have to be taught in order to acquire this indispensable aptitude.

    Read More

  • Inequality In John Locke's Second Treatise Of Government

    1083 Words  | 5 Pages

    John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government is most known for his justification of private property, but there are many other theories, though not as popular, that are equally as important. One of these is his justification of inequality, which will be covered in this essay. Locke says that until the invention of money, there was no point to accumulate more property, or wealth, than one could use because it would spoil. That changed after the introduction of money because money does not spoil, which allows people to accumulate more than they need. Locke argues that since men agreed to use money as a way to fairly possess more than they could use, they also agreed to the consequence of inequality.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Social Darwinism And The Social Gospel Movement

    583 Words  | 3 Pages

    nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty. (Keller 551).” Another advocate of social Darwinism, William Graham Summer, a Yale University professor, argued against any government regulation of business or programs intended to promote social or financial equality. He alleged that helping those he considered unfit, was done so at the expense of the fit, therefore, harmful to society. According to Summer, millionaires became rich because they had the judgement, courage and determination to succeed.

    Read More

  • Essay On Inequality In America

    411 Words  | 2 Pages

    Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.

    Read More

  • Economic Inequality In America Essay

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    America prides itself on being one of the most effective democratically governed counties. The idea of the American dream is that all people have equivalent political freedoms and a responsive government. However the effectiveness of social equality is being threatened by increasing inequality in the United States. Economic inequality in the US has expanded drastically. The wealth gap has had drastic changes over the past 35 years.

    Read More

  • 1984 George Orwell Income Inequality Analysis

    475 Words  | 2 Pages

    The middle class want to become rich and the low class only wants equality.” Orwell’s predictions of the party, the government in modern society, rises to power and the poor stay poor. In LA Times “Income Inequality makes the rich more scrooge-like, study finds”, “Since the 1980’s -- the end of a 30-year period… wealth has grown increasingly concentrated at the top of the economic ladder, while low-income Americans have commanded a smaller and smaller share of the nation’s wealth.” *add where quote is from* ”... top 5 percent of American families saw their real income increase 74.9 percent… the lowest-income fifth saw a decrease in real income of 12.1 percent… Sharply contrasting with the 1947-79 period… with the lowest income group actually seeing the largest gains.”

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of William Graham Sumner

    984 Words  | 4 Pages

    He wanted to persuade the government to overturn the laws regulating corporations. He wanted corporations to have the freedom to decide whether to give to the poor. Sumner suggested that in order to favor the unfittest, we have to first destroy liberty, which means the right to choose and dispose of a product. He wanted society to favor the best so society can be advanced as a whole. Sumner uses ethos effectively because of his authority and credibility.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Rich Pay Higher Taxes?

    1212 Words  | 5 Pages

    The rich are the ones who benefit the most from the government. Those big corporations and industries make billions of dollars from the public, and guess who owns them, rich people. So how do we solve our problem? You can’t make the poor pay more taxes, they don’t have the money. We also can’t really flatten the tax rate fairly because the only way to reduce the riches tax pay is to soak the middle class.

    Read More

  • Should Rich People Pay More Tax Essay

    752 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why must the rich pay more tax to help the poor? Although taxing more on rich seems unfair for the rich, it is necessary that rich people should pay more tax and the amount they pay are based on their incomes. First of all, the important reason that can be presented is that the rich people have utilized the public system more. As Elizabeth Warren said, "There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody.”

    Read More

More about The Influence Of William Sumner's Ideas On Society

Open Document