ipl-logo

The Insanity Verdict On Trial By Scott O. Lilienfeld

1669 Words7 Pages

What exactly is the insanity defense? In a criminal trial situation the insanity defense is used to explain that the defendant was not responsible for his or her actions at the time the crime was committed due to a mental health illness or a mental handicap. Now you have to think of the reasoning, is this form of defense used as an actual defense for one who irresponsibly committed a crime or as a last resort hoping for an acquittal before a defendant is about to be handed a guilty verdict? Most people being asked would say it is being used for sane people trying to get out of a crime they committed, but I believe the insanity defense is misunderstood by society and should strictly be used for its creation of mentally ill individuals.
My problem …show more content…

The Insanity Verdict on Trial written by Scott O. Lilienfeld. This article explains how the insanity defense originally came about, through Daniel McNaighton in 1843. McNaighton was acquitted after planning to kill the British Prime Minister and accidentally ending up killing his secretary. McNaighton’s reasoning behind the attack was that he thought the government was out to get him, thus a form of mental insanity. “Reacting to public anger to the verdict, a panel of judges fashioned a guideline for insanity, now called the McNaughton rule: to be declared insane, defendants must either not have known what they were doing at the time or not have realized their actions were wrong” (Lilienfeld). Lilienfeld then goes on to explain the two sides of the defense, the critics and the advocates. The critics believe that anyone, no matter their mental state, that commit an illegal offense should be charged as guilty and face the same sentence. The advocates believe that if the defendant has a mental illness that obscures their mental state then they should not be charged with the crime and should rather be hospitalized or …show more content…

Reforming the Insanity Defense: The Need for a Psychological Defect Plea written by Allyson L. Gay. This article focuses on serial killers and their psychotic mental disorders. Gay points out that technically serial killers are mentally insane and therefore should be able to use the insanity defense in a trial. However, because a serial killer has obviously committed the same crime numerous times, the form of the insanity defense should be reformed. “Psychopathy does not fit into the McNaughton test. However, a serial killer suffering from psychopathy cannot control his or her impulses, identify with others and feel empathy, and cannot conform his or her behavior to social norms. Thus, proving he or she cannot possibly be completely competent and responsible for their actions, no matter how heinous” (Gay). However, there is a difference between someone diagnosed with psychopathy and someone with anti-social personality disorder. “Unlike serial killers with psychopathy, those with anti-social personality disorder should not be allowed to plead guilty by reason of insanity. They lack empathy but otherwise understand what they are doing. Unlike serial killers with psychopathy they manipulate the system to benefit their own means to an end. Allowing this disorder to fall into the insanity defense would feed into their disorder in that it would allow for the manipulation of the system to

Show More
Related

  • Examples Of Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity

    641 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) is a form of insanity defense that allows for an individual to not be found guilty of a crime due to a mental defect or disease that results in a lack of mens rea, or the capability to intentionally commit a crime. However, simply having a mental illness or defect does not guarantee that an offender will be found NGRI. Not only would a defendant have to have a major or severe mental illness or disease, but the defendant would have to prove that their condition impaired them so greatly as to not have any control over their behavior or any concept that they had done anything wrong at the time of the offense. Although Bob undoubtedly had a diminished capacity for logic and reason in this case, the example as given does not provide enough detail to determine the nature of Bob’s personality or his potential motives in committing this crime. Nevertheless, there is one major flaw to Bob’s insanity defense: he tried to hide the crime.

    Read More

  • Was Jeffrey Dahmer Insane

    1895 Words  | 8 Pages

    According to WGBH Education Foundation (2014), out of the court cases that plead insanity only 1% of those cases is a criminals outcome affected. Therefore, the few cases that are changed by the plea of insanity are very significant and have to meet certain standards. Jeffrey Dahmer had many mental illnesses but was not considered insane enough to add to this statistic. Jeffrey Dahmer’s case was not the most significant point in the courts understanding of mental illness because he was able to decide if an action was right or wrong, he was not considered insane, and pleading insanity did not benefit his outcome. Biography.com (2018) states that Jeffrey Dahmer was a serial killer who was convicted of the murders or 17 males between 1978 and 1991.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Clark V. Arizona, 548 US

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Under Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-502, does Aaron Wilson, 1) suffer from a mental disease or defect at the time of the incident, and 2) know right from wrong at the time of the incident; and will therefore be found guilty except insane? A.R.S § 13-502 states “a person may be found guilty except insane if at the time of the commission of the criminal act, the person was afflicted with a mental disorder or defect of such severity that the person did not know the criminal act was wrong.” Ariz. Rev. Stat.

    Read More

  • Andrea Yates Case

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    At the 2002 trial, Yates pleaded not guilty, by using the insanity defense. The insanity defense argues that an individual should not be found guilty of a crime if they have a persistent psychiatric disease at the time the crime was committed. It was proved that Yates could tell right from wrong, so she did not meet the definition of the insanity in Texas (Walsh). The jury deliberated for almost four hours, and finally found Yates guilty. The jury rejected her insanity defense, and Yates was sentenced to life in prison.

    Read More

  • The Insane: The Case Of Andrea Yates

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    People have their own opinions when it comes to issuing court trials, especially when it comes down to a person being found guilty, or a person being found not guilty by reason of insanity. Did this person know what they were doing when they committed a crime? Did they know it was morally wrong? Do they have any remorse for what they have done? These are all questions courts look at when someone has committed a brutal crime, but is it fair to claim someone as “insane” or “mentally ill”, rather than putting them behind bars and calling them a criminal like the rest of them?

    Read More

  • What Is Myers III V. State Of Indiana An Example Of Mental Competency?

    1528 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the field of criminal law there is a certain type of criminal defense that comes to the court and has a low success rate. These cases concern the mental capacity of the defendant and if they have enough mental capacity, or are sane enough, to be aware of their crime and consequences of crime. The insanity defense is extremely rare because of how difficult it is for the defense to prove to the court and jury that the defendant did not have the mental capacity to understand what they did wrong and the consequences from it. The case of Myers III v. State of Indiana is one example of criminal responsibility and mental capacity. This case has information that can be connected to the textbook with the insanity defense tests, mental competence

    Read More

  • Insanity Defense Reform

    92 Words  | 1 Pages

    In refers to class discussion, as a result of the M’Nagthen case, the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 (IDRA) is only use when the defendant does not understand the nature of the crime committed. Therefore, although neurosis or personality disorders qualify as a mental disease according to the DSM-5; the law has eliminated these types of disorders from being utilized in courts as a form of defense. The law has also excluded the irresistible impulse or inabilities to comply with the rules as a means of defense in the federal

    Read More

  • Mentally Ill Treatment

    704 Words  | 3 Pages

    When someone commits a crime, a news reporter sometimes ends the story by saying that the person was suffering from some type of mental illness. This causes the public to believe that everyone with mental illness must either be committing crimes or are more likely to do so. Those who are mentally ill are sometimes left to find treatment in their own

    Read More

  • Insanity Defense Reform Essay

    2347 Words  | 10 Pages

    I agree that the insanity defense is morally right. There are defects of the system. However, the criminal justice system’s foundation is made up of moral integrity. As a society we have decided to excuse those who lack the moral capabilities to know right from wrong. The murkiness of the system should not automatically equate to the abolishment of the defense.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Case Against Mr. Grey

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    His behavior points to guilt not insanity. Why guilt? Because he killed an innocent man who never wronged him but due to his eye he took his life. Don’t let this man get away with murder. Thank You, Your

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The NGRI Defense

    861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Are they trying to beat the system? A number of us will turn on the TV or scroll through social media multiple times a day. We might just happen to run into a court case where the offender pleads not guilty by reason of insanity. Some may roll their eyes, some will shake their heads, and others may just skip onto the next topic.

    Read More

  • In Cold Blood Insanity Defense

    621 Words  | 3 Pages

    A case can be changed due to the call of the insanity plea. Nevertheless, This may cause a possible difference to the charge of the defence. In a court case dealing with murder such as the issue with the Clutter family, the Insanity plea was brought into thought to test if Perry and Dick were mentally stable during that time. By definition, the insanity plea is an argument stating the defense was not responsible for their actions due to a psychiatric disease at the time of the act, consequently, making him/her unaware of the occurring actions moreover the later consequences. In the book, In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, the main characters Perry and Dick killed the Clutter family committing the crime of the century.

    Read More

  • Miller V. State: Insanity

    350 Words  | 2 Pages

    When it comes to the case Miller V. State, I believe that trial court refused to give the jury instructions regarding the insanity defense, which the defendant wished to have comunicated, because they wanted the jury to be able to decide imoartially. Miller was examined by three medical experts and they concluded that Miller satisfied the M'naughten insanity test when he stabbed Goring. The district court had instructed the jury to determine whether Miller was actually legally insane when he stabbed Goring. They wanted the jury to find proof of insanity at that time, and to also consider Miller's mental condition "before and after the killing to throw light on what Miller's mental condition was at the time of the killing" (Schmalleger

    Read More

  • Use Of The Insanity Plea By Andrea Yates

    2597 Words  | 11 Pages

    During my true crime podcast era, I came across Andrea Yates. Yates was a mother who killed her five young children by drowning them in a bathtub. While listening to this case, it was revealed that the insanity plea, or also known as the insanity defense, was used. It got me thinking about how the plea works and how people would allow this outcome over a jail sentence. The insanity plea is a tough topic to tackle in the world of criminal law.

    Read More

  • What Is The Insanity Defense Of Andrea Yates

    1097 Words  | 5 Pages

    Anyone who reads Yates’ mental health records will likely agree that justice was done after the first trial. If there ever was a defendant who deserved the benefit of the insanity defense, it was this sick, sad woman. She is currently serving her time in a maximum-security criminal ward in a state mental hospital. The difference is that in a state mental hospital, Yates will received the treatment she needs and has a chance to get better (Cassel, Elaine, 2006).

    Read More

More about The Insanity Verdict On Trial By Scott O. Lilienfeld

Open Document