All of the Persian citizens looked up to Alexander’s greatness, and followed in his footsteps. The citizens of the Persian Empire believed Alexander was a descent of the god Hercules. Alexander the Great was a big icon himself but also looked up to other rulers such as Julius Caesar and George Patton. Admiring these big icon helped Alexander become a better ruler and warrior. He conquered vast amounts of land which ran through the east and west of Rome.
As the successor to Philip II and Great King of a vast empire, Alexander must have possessed aspects that qualify him for his noble position. Based on Plutarch’s account of Alexander, he was intelligent and had the utmost respect for knowledge; his appreciation of philosophy lasted throughout his life and his intelligence made him capable of making the decisions of a king. Alexander also seemed to have had an arrogance fit for his status. Alexander’s haughtiness, although it often does land him in heated situations, also strengthens his confidence as a leader. His leadership capabilities began at a young age, and its extent is reflected by the immensity of the Macedonian empire by the end of his reign.
The Impact of Alexander the Great’s Invasions Alexander III of Macedon is known as Alexander the Great. He became a king after his father’s death and tried to conquer most of the cities of that period. He was a very talented person and had impressive diplomatic and military skills. For these qualities, he is known as “the Great.” Although Alexander faced many protests, but he won many battles and extended the territory of his empire very quickly. Alexander spread his political and military influence throughout Greece, Asia, Minor, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and India.
Born to parents King Philip II and Queen Olympia, who was the daughter of King Neoptolemus. With the high qualities of both King Philip and Queen Olympia, Alexander was set for total greatness. He would become a great influence in the ancient world. And his rise to the throne would be one that would be talked about and surely no one would forget. Alexander always knew he was going to do well he believed in being the god given child lead the people of the new empire quoted from ancient.Eu “Alexander was
Alexander was given the nickname “Alexander the Great”, due to his success in his Greek empire. However, after taking a closer look at how Alexander maintained his empire and treated his troops, it is evident that he was vain, cruel, and disloyal, which proves that Alexander the Great was not truly great. Alexander proved many times over the course of his ruling that he was a vain and selfish leader. A map created by various sources in Document A shows the cities that he and his troops conquered from Macedonia to India. This may seem
Alexander’s arrival to Egypt provided benefits for both the Greeks and Egyptians, embracing the religion of the area, and paved the way for what would later be the Egyptian Empire. One of the most significant and most prosperous generals in all of history was Alexander the Great. He was described as a” scintillating, patient and often devious man that struck with careful planning.”1 Alexander made decisions with great agility and took exceptional risks, his prosperity was resolved by his show of precipitous force and his will to overcome. In his lifetime Alexander defeated the Persians and Greeks, conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, and procured the Mediterranean Sea. In 332 B.C.E.
The teachings of Aristotle impacted Alexander by showing his conquered provinces a sense of tolerance due to both generosity and political wisdom rather than applying an artificial scheme to all countries; the adoption of the division of power was incorporated to prevent the possibility of rebellion (6). However, despite implementing an improved political system, Alexander established himself as a liberator by using harsh force on rebellious cities and executing an individual with a powerful influence that threatened his control (1). In order to achieve his mission of unification, Alexander felt that the best method of instilling Hellenism was by abiding with their values; he adopted the dress of a Persian king at the court ceremonies in order to strengthen his relationship and appear less foreign toward the Persians (6). Alexander the Great devised various means for unification by proposing to relocate settlers, promoting intermarriage between Persians and Macedonians, and instituting equality towards military service by training the youth located in the East as Macedonian soldiers and teaching them how to use their weapons in order to become Hellenized barbarians after 5 years (6). Alexander the Great had significantly impacted western civilization by creating various systems in order to strengthen the overall influence of the Greek
Throughout history, Alexander III of Macedon, or more commonly referred to as Alexander the Great, is known as the paradigm of a military genius, pioneer of globalization, and for spreading Hellenism throughout the Greek and Far East world. However, two of the above statements that personify Alexander I believe to be misleading. Without question, Alexander will serve as a template for military leaders with his remarkable military record, deliberate tactics, and charisma that allowed for him to muster troops to fight for him. However, Alexander should not be seen as the archetype for globalization and for spreading Hellenism throughout the known world. Furthermore, Alexander was a destroyer of already established cultures, an overzealous
Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound. First, his father was able to unite the Greek city-states, and Alexander destroyed the Persian Empire forever. More importantly, Alexander's conquests spread Greek culture, also known as Hellenism, across his empire. (338) In fact, Alexander's reign marked the beginning of a new era known as the Hellenistic Age because of the powerful influence that Greek culture had on other people. Without Alexander's ambition, Greek ideas and culture might well have remained confined to
Alexander the Great was a leader of Macedonia at a very young age. Here is my take on whether he is a hero or a villain. Alexander caused widespread destruction, according to the Persians, “Persians also condemn him for the widespread destruction he was thought to have encouraged to cultural and religious sites throughout the empire” (Ansari). Alexander thought it was an achievement to capture the Persians, “Alexander would have been familiar with stories such as these. The Persian Empire was not something to be conquered as much as an achievement to be acquired” (Ansari).