Stephen A. Douglas was born in Brandon Vermont in 1813. Douglas grew up and studied law in New York before moving to Illinois in 1833. In Illinois, Douglas helped to organize a Democratic party. He played a large part in the setup and and organization of said party, introducing many useful features such as committees and regularity of meetings. Stephen Douglas held many positions during his time, including several state offices, a seat on the House of Representatives, and the position of United States Senator. However, one notable position Douglas did not hold was that of president, despite his many great achievements in his other places of office.
Douglas is famous for his many achievements during his time in office in Congress especially. He fought for the Compromise of 1850, which helped to balance slave with free states, by admitting California to the Union as a free state, and Utah and New Mexico would decide for themselves free
…show more content…
That is why he so fervently supported the idea of popular sovereignty; it would not be him deciding the issue of slave state or not, but rather the settlers of said territories. However, in doing this he did lose some support from both the north and the south. He gained back a little support when he stood against James Buchanan who had attempted to make Kansas a slave state by rigging the voting and other such skullduggery. When running for the position of United States Senator in Illinois, Douglas faced opposition from candidate Abraham Lincoln. After separately touring the state and making speeches, the two candidates decided to come together in what is known as the Lincoln Douglas debates. During these debates, Lincoln tried to force Douglas into being more decisive, eventually getting him to make what is now called the Freeport
In 1858 Stephen Douglas a spokesman for the Democratic Party, was seeking reelection to a third term in the U.S. Senate, and Abraham Lincoln was running for Douglas’s Senate seat as a Republican. Douglas and Lincoln traveled across the state of Illinois in a series of debates hitting seven of the nine Congressional Districts. Douglas and Lincoln each took turns discussing party politics, the future of the nation, and the most important topic slavery. Who won the debates, is the question that is still being asked in the year 2016. Through my own personal study and review of The Lincolns Douglas Debates, it is my personal opinion that Stephen Douglas not Abraham Lincoln won the debates because of how the election system was set up in 1858, by
Stephen Hopkins was born on March 7, 1707 in Scituate (then a part of Providence), Rhode Island. Hopkins was the second oldest signer of the constitution, behind Benjamin Franklin. (1) Growing up Hopkins was supposedly self-educated. Hopkins gained his success purely by his own efforts. Scituate was an agricultural community and Hopkins earned his living farming.
Stephen Douglas, an advocate of popular sovereignty, and Abraham Lincoln, a Republican candidate, were both running to represent Illinois in the United States Senate. These two men met in a sequence of seven debates before they battled for office of presidency in the election of 1858. Slavery eventually became the main issue discussed repeatedly in each of the debates, due to the Mexican War adding new territories left to be assessed as free soil or not. During this time, the Compromise of 1850 was a temporary fix to the sectional issues for the states that made the decision to participate in the extension of slavery. However, the Missouri Compromise of 1854 brought the issue back up again.
Republicans from the North such as Abraham Lincoln were against the spread of slavery, and so Sen. Stephen Douglas made a symbolic move against the North, the territories which would have been unlikely candidates for slave-holding states were stormed by slaveholders from Missouri, and brief fighting broke out in Kansas. The North was struck again with the effect of the Dred Scott v. Stanford case, which ruled that slavery could not be banned in the United States. This was a setback to anti-slavery Northerners, who though fighting to keep slavery out of their states, were told that slavery must be allowed universally. Dred Scott v. Stanford ensured that the Northerners felt their values were being attacked, and began to rise defensively as they began to sense compromise would not work in their
1. John Quincy Adams He won the election of 1824 with the help of henry clay who then became his Secretary of State. He wanted to change and establish many things that angered many people, especially the southerners because they would have to suffer the taxes. The way he dealt with the Cherokee Indian tribe went against what the Georgians wanted. 2.
Stephen Hopkins was a man born into riches, but overcame many struggles like any man. Hopkins was educated through books and not schools as there were none in the early days of American civilization. Although he was not taught very many subjects he still excelled in life and became a knowing and wise man. Hopkins quickly rose up in politics and did many other important things than just signing a paper filled with thoughts of liberty. Stephen accomplished the ultimate goal of being remembered as a kind hearted man that knew what was right and firmly walked in righteousness.
The election of 1860 was one of the most influential in the history of the U.S. Tensions were high between democratic and republican parties. The democratic party itself was divided. Laws regarding slavery were conflicting with each other causing outrage on both sides of the issue. Something needed to be done and the election was the answer to it. A firm foundation needed to be set on slavery and it would drive the entire nation in the direction of the Commander and Chief’s choosing.
Lincoln following his campaign goals supported abolishing slavery. The South was not happy when Lincoln became president because they knew he was against slavery and realized the threat he brought to their “peculiar institutions.” This led to the southern states to believe there was no hope for them to stay with the Union if Lincoln were to become President. If slavery were to be abolished, then their own individual states will not prosper. South Carolina was the first state to leave the Union, and this led to more states leaving to create a new group called the Confederation.
With a desire to achieve the ideology of manifest destiny, the United States called war on Mexico to acquire their land. However, with the United States’ victory came the inevitable debate about slavery in not only the newly acquired territories, but also in the nation as a whole. The nation began to divide on the issue of slavery due to the Missouri Compromise which legalized slavery below the 36°30’ parallel and the Kansas-Nebraska Act which decided that the issue of slavery should be solved by popular sovereignty. Controversy sparked by political decisions like those aforementioned and events about slavery, disputes over slavery status in the territories, and extremist outlooks on the solution to these issues increased sectionalism and
Abraham Lincoln, Frederic Douglass, were one of the most appealing well-known speakers, people who did believe that slavery was morally wrong and devote their lives to fight for freedom. However, there are several differences between the view of the Constitution’s position differences between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Kansas-Nebraska Act indicated that the recognition of slavery should be determined by the decision of these residents (popular or squatter sovereignty). This act itself conflicted heavily with the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, which was essentially seen as the admittance of slavery anywhere in the country. This act made a political issue of confrontation between North and South.
In fact, his state in him inaugural address that he had to real interest in abolishing slavery, in an attempt to reassure Southerners. Prior to his election, Lincoln took a very similar position when he ran for the US Senate. In his acceptance speech he stated "I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free." He then went on to say that "slavery in the United States would eventually have to end everywhere or become legal everywhere in order for the nation to survive." Although Lincoln was not the kind of man to condone or approve of slavery, he did not take a stance against
One of the first major events during Lincoln’s political career was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which was passed through Congress by Stephen A. Douglas. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, was a bill that gave Kansas and Nebraska the right to decide on their own, by popular vote, whether or not slavery would be instituted in the state. Interestingly, Lincoln’s response to Douglas’ decision was not immediate. He remained silent for a while before delivering many speeches, the longest being the Peoria Speech. In all of his speeches, Lincoln argued that Douglas’ decision did not correlate with the intention of the founding fathers, who wanted the expansion of slavery to be prohibited and hoped that slavery will
After the 1860 election, Lincoln made a firm public decision not to accept the expansion of slavery into the territories. In other words, Lincoln 's early position as president was that, slavery could remain in current slave states but could not expand to new states or territories. Although, Lincoln’s views on slavery often shifted some of them seemed to contradict one another. On another note, current slave states could vouch to keep things the way that they are but, Lincoln still felt that if a nation was divided it would be almost impossible to survive. Lincoln 's views at this time were politically motivated, and they focused on ending the war and preserving the Union.
Something bad was going to happen. The North wanted Kansas but ultimately, the South won the vote, controlling Kansas for its own making it a slave state. Lincoln promised to keep slavery, but when this country was torn apart, he decided to end slavery once a for all. He tried to bring this country back to where it was before. Some believe he is the greatest president we have ever had as a nation, but even Abraham Lincoln couldn't repair this country.
In this election, Lincoln and Douglas had some series of debates over slavery. Although Lincoln never exactly stated that he wanted to abolish slavery, much of the South believed he was an Abolitionist. At his speech in 1858 in Springfield Illinois, Lincoln wanted the nation to be one thing or another, meaning all free or all slave, because it couldn’t keep going on how it was, else it would fall apart. In his speech, Lincoln said, “...but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other” (Doc G).