ipl-logo

The Limitations Of John Stuart Mill And Freedom Of Speech

1301 Words6 Pages

In the society of today, discussion on the topic of freedom of speech is at a forefront. The question on whether there are any limitations on the freedom of speech is one which causes a constant battle between “right and wrong” within the media and with public institutions. The argument that there are no limitations to expression is one which bears a lot of support from not just the liberalist area of society, but also quite often draws a lot of support from the conservative part too, as it is something that allows both sides to express their opinions. The importance of expressing ones opinions is something that the philosopher and economist John Stuart Mill believes is a fundamental part of human liberty. It is certainly true that there are always more than one way of looking at a situation, and finding truth within a situation can only be found if there are no limitations to people’s freedom of expressing their opinions on the said situation. Mill’s argument that since no-one is infallible, freedom of speech is necessary for the discovery and defence of truth (p443, John Stuart Mill and Freedom of Speech – Il Pensiero Politico 4.3: T.D Campbell. 1st Jan 1971) has been extremely influential in defending the freedom of speech.
One of Mill’s core arguments when it comes to liberty and freedom of speech is that there is an inherent importance and duty to “act out” or express one’s opinion, that it is important for humans to engage in discussion as no-one person’s view is

Show More
Related

  • The First Amendment In The Bill Of Rights By Walter Lippmann

    692 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most Americans fought for their individual rights for decades before WW2. The first amendment in the Bill of Rights guarantees the right to free speech meaning that the citizens of America are allowed to read, write, and share ideas freely and act in opposition. Walter Lippmann, social philosopher and writer’s, article, The Indispensable Opposition, appeared in the Atlantic Monthly in 1939 during WW2. Lippmann informs Americans in the article on the importance of everyone having the freedom of speech and opinion in society by separating what is believed and what is the truth by creating juxtaposition, incorporating strong repetition, and invoking powerful diction to set the tone.

    Read More

  • Federalist Vs Anti Federalists Dbq Essay

    1529 Words  | 7 Pages

    By the freedom of opinion, cannot be meant the right of thinking merely; for of this right the greatest Tyrant cannot deprive his meanest slave; but it is freedom in the communication of sentiments [by] speech or through the press” (Voices of Freedom, Chapter

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill Principle Analysis

    1245 Words  | 5 Pages

    The object of this essay is to show a simple evaluation of john Stuart mill principle “an action is right that it does not cause harm to another person” I will be exercising both evaluations and explaining why the positive side outweighs the negative side of the principle, in a society that it’s people are emancipated to control their own opinions. Mill Stuart in his autobiography of 1873 he narrates liberty as a philosophic chronicle of indivisible accuracy. (Mill (1989.edn).p.189) rather than speaking of rights, many claim a ‘right’ not to be harmed ,mill says that only a harm or risk to harm is enough vindication for using power above someone else. John Stuart moreover he adequate his principle by reckoning that it is not good to use power

    Read More

  • Crystal Kelley

    1040 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this paper, I will argue that intended parents, not gestational carriers, should have the right to decide whether the carrier continues to gestate a fetus or not in cases where the fetus has a severe, life-threatening physical or mental deficit (Cohen 2013). The gestational carrier, such as Crystal Kelley, gestates a fetus for a couple or potential parent and has no genetic tie to the child, unlike a surrogate (Byrn and Snyder 2005). In Crystal Kelley’s case, the intended couple wanted to abort the fetus because it had severe health defects such as holoprosencephaly and heterotaxy, in which the brain is not divided into two hemispheres and the internal organs are displaced (Cohen 2013). However, Ms. Kelley was unwilling to abort the fetus

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

    1204 Words  | 5 Pages

    The theory also discusses falsehoods and their place in the marketplace of ideas. The theory places falsehoods as a very important part of the marketplace, because falsehoods contribute to the integrity of the truths. The article then goes on to discuss the importance of Intellectual Freedom and Freedom of Speech in democracy. Oltmann states that Freedom of Speech is necessary to democracy because it allows the circulation of free thought and opinions that then lead to political involvement of Americans. The source then discusses the place that the library and IF

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of The Indispensable Opposition By Walter Lippmann

    542 Words  | 3 Pages

    Freedom is an important aspect in society. Living in the twenty first century, freedom is taken for granted, however because its so easily attained, freedom has never been seen as something important. Walter Lippmann a famous writer during 1939, argues in his article The Indispensable Opposition the importance of freedom of opinion. Although it’s written in the twentieth century, his argument still applies today. With the use of different rhetorical strategies,like interruption, persuasive diction, and metaphors Walter Lippmann emphasizes his opinion of freedom in society.

    Read More

  • Why The First Amendment (And Journalism) Might Be In Trouble

    1055 Words  | 5 Pages

    Freedom of expression is one of the laws the forefathers of America made to empower its citizens and also enables them to live in peace amongst themselves. In most countries around the world, freedom of expression does not exist, so there is always war in those countries. In the article “Why the First Amendment (and Journalism) Might Be in Trouble”, the authors, Ken Dautrich, chair of the Public Policy at the University of Connecticut and John Bare, who is the vice president for strategic planning and evaluation at the Arthur M. Blank Family foundation in Atlanta, conducted a research study on the importance of freedom of speech. They used their research findings to support freedom of expressions. They employed claim of policy, claim of fact and also appeal to pathos and logos in their argument of the importance of the freedom of speech.

    Read More

  • The Indispensable Opposition Analysis

    289 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article, “The Indispensable Opposition,” author, Walter Lippmann, argues his claim that we must view the freedom of oppositions as a way to improve our decisions in a democratic society rather than just tolerating that freedom of speech. When freedom of speech is tolerated and only seen as a right to speak, Lippmann believes that the liberty of opinion becomes a luxury. Moving forward, Lippmann then states that we must understand that the freedom of speech for our opponents are a vital necessity since it provides our own opinions to grow in improvement. Through practical experience, we realize we need the freedom of opposition and is no longer just our opponent ’s right.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Remonstrance By Thomas Paine

    1479 Words  | 6 Pages

    This unfair treatment of women by the laws actuated Thomas Paine who asserted that women were robbed of freedom of will by both the civil and the common law. The remonstrance by Thomas Paine and other concerned legal scholars against the oppressive nature of these laws evoked a language of rights in relation to women in the 1890’s. Inspired by the ideas and thoughts of Paine, John Stuart Mill argued that women deserve the right to vote and he, therefore, proposed that the term “man” be replaced with a more neutral terminology like “person.” His proposal, at that stage, won little support amongst contemporaries and was met with ridicule.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Stormy Mind Of John Stuart Mill

    1104 Words  | 5 Pages

    I chose to review the fifth chapter of “New Ideas From Dead Economists” titled The Stormy Mind of John Stuart Mill. John Stuart Mill was born in 1806 in London to two strict parents who began to educate their son at a very young age. Mill’s father was James Mill, a famous historian and economist, who began to teach his son Greek at the age of three. The book reports that “by eight, the boy had read Plato, Xenophon, and Diogenes” and by twelve “Mill exhausted well-stocked libraries, reading Aristotle and Aristophanes and mastering calculus and geometry” (Buchholz 93). The vast amount of knowledge that Mill gained at a young age no doubt assisted him in becoming such a well-recognized philosopher and economist.

    Read More

  • Summary Of John Stuart Mill's Consideration On Representative Government

    1128 Words  | 5 Pages

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill essay on Consideration On representative Government, is an argument for representative government. The ideal form of government in Mill's opinion. One of the more notable ideas Mill is that the business of government representatives is not to make legislation. Instead Mill suggests that representative bodies such as parliaments and senates are best suited to be places of public debate on the various opinions held by the population and to act as watchdogs of the professionals who create and administer laws and policy.

    Read More

  • Why Is The Bill Of Rights Important

    793 Words  | 4 Pages

    The right to speak freely is a type of expression that numerous individuals are sufficiently fortunate to work out, individuals must be careful, in light of the fact that this privilege can incite significant issues if isn 't all around

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill The Negro Question Analysis

    1914 Words  | 8 Pages

    My topic originated from reading Thomas Carlyle and John Stuart Mill 's debate in December 1849-January 1850. Both writers published anonymously in Fraser ' Magazine, with Carlyle writing a violent critique, ‘Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question’, and Mill sending in an outraged response simply entitled ‘The Negro Question’ that appeared in the following issue. Counteracting Carlyle 's very racist vision of the repartition of work among Black and White Jamaicans with arguments undermining that conception , Mill retorted But I again renounce all advantage from facts: were the whites born ever so superior in intelligence to the blacks, and competent by nature to instruct and advise them, it would not be the less monstrous to assert that

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

    817 Words  | 4 Pages

    The fact that one has the right to say and believe is the foundation for democracy to function. If no one dared to say their opinions, then it had become a dictatorship where only one opinion on how society and the country should work had been the “right”. If people dared to express their opinions, they will help improving the society one lives. Freedom of speech gives one the responsibility to consider what fits into different contexts, and it will make us better persons and people. Simply, people will feel safe in the society they live in.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill's View On Freedom: A Definition Of Freedom

    1119 Words  | 5 Pages

    Being Free 1st draft Freedom is word used in a lot of contexts, but the official meaning of the word is “the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants” (Freedom). Meaning that you have the right to do something, with the focus being on you as an individual. This means no one can tell you what to do, like for example a state. This is an important aspect and part of political theory. Liberty is also used and viewed as the same category of theory, and has the definition “The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s behavior or political views” (Liberty).

    Read More

More about The Limitations Of John Stuart Mill And Freedom Of Speech

Open Document