The Lovely Bones is a 2008 fiction novel with 329 pages by Alice Sebold , it is also a 2009 drama and thriller film that is two hours and fifteen minutes long. Both the movie and the book are beautiful yet chilling stories. They 're about a girl named Susie Salmon who was murdered when she was fourteen on december 6th of 1973. I like how in both versions they wrap it up without any loose ends; the story comes full circle. The massage i feel they give is everything happens for a reason even if you don 't understand that reason right away. I recommend both tear jerking perceptions of the story but for more detail and understanding i suggest to read a book first. Each tell the story astonishingly but the book tells it in more detail than the …show more content…
A few examples of this are Susie 's murder. In the movie she is lured in and murdered but it does not show or explain it where in the book she is lured in the same but then in detail it described how she was raped and murdered and disposed of. Another would be Ray and Ruth. In the book and movie Ray is Susie 's first and only love interest and in the book Susie inhabits Ruth 's body and has intercourse with Ray then tries to contact her family while Ruth is up with the murdered women she saw , in the movie they only kiss and Ray is the only one she tries to reach. Some small difference would be how the order is different things that happen early in the movie aren 't discussed till later in the book. The affair abigail has left out in the movie as well as franny, holly and susie in heaven mother figure. It is obvious that they are the same story told differently. The lovely bones Is a devastatingly beautiful story each way it 's told. It 's the rawest way i 've seen the message everything happens for a reason put out in the world. Both the movie and the book have put me in a very emotional state. First the book then the movie is the order i found makes more sense. I recommend them both for
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
The book or the movie? Well for me, the movie is the way to go. All you have to do is sit there and watch it. How hard is that? Here’s some reasons why some choose the movie over the book.
Both novels share many similar aspects that relate back to the idea of living in fear of life or death, along with writing from a child's perspective and another being the time period and
My favorite being the book for many reasons. I prefer it because it has more details, many more characters and I also felt like the movie was everywhere. Meaning that it didn’t flow as smoothly as the book for the reason of the order. For example when I said that there where more details in the book it included the characters.
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
So even though there are a few similarities, there are more differences. The movie is mainly about civil rights, but the book isn’t which changes the plot a lot. While there are some similarities like how all the family members are the same; there are still more differences. Even though both the book and the movie are “Watsons Go To Birmingham”, they are very different from each
While the book is more of a story, and provides much more detail of the horrible things that he lived
It was not deep and compelling as Young Goodman Brown. In “Young Goodman Brown” the mood was darker, using characters like the devil or setting the story in the woods affected the whole story was portrayed and the way things played out for Goodman Brown. Another difference in the stories is the ending of the stories there were two complete different ending. In “Young Goodman Brown”, the story ending was sad while in “The Prodigal Son” it was a happy ending. Illuminating the themes of forgiveness which ends in happiness and Sin which ends in sadness.
Men and women tend to behave in a way that will allow them to fit in, as opposed to doing what will make them the happiest. The characters in "The Lovely Bones" by Alice Sebold experience this push toward conformity while coping with a terrible loss. Abigail, after the social norms of her generation forces her towards motherhood, must come to terms with her shortcomings. This absence of a proper mother figure affects Abigail's son, Buckley, by depriving him of the ability to freely show his pain. Ruth, however, is able to defy social norms surrounding sexuality, but faces the consequences of being different in a world filled with similarity.
On the other hand the movie scenes just rush past your eyes and the next scene has already started. Take for example “Mr Percival’s breathing was shallow and quick, his body and neck were drooping,and for long stretches at a time his eyes were shut. ”(pg.72). Whereas in the movie Mr Percival gets shot and is never found, and the scene of Mr Percival's death was brief and dull. This suggests that the book has more suspense than the
As for example when Sofia Harpo's wife is sent to prison for knocking out the mayor, in the book it is said to have happened the night she comes home with her new man. But in the movie Sofia lives with her family for a couple of weeks in town. Although it doesn’t drastically change the movie itself, but it changes other parts in the movie to where one can notice the out of placement given. Something else that is highly out of place is how in the book the reader is able to learn about Netties life as she writes to Celie, but in the movie we as reader never learn about Netties adult life until Celie finds her letters with Shug. Then later on Nettie comes home with her new family to reunite with Celie after thirty
Both the film and the novel incorporate Holmes as the judgemental, observational, and intelligent detective, while Stapleton is the cunning, evil villain. the novel, there are more main characters, such as Laura Lyons, who plays an important role in the case. It states, "Mrs. Laura Lyons of Coombe Tracey had written to Sir Charles Baskerville and made an appointment with him at that very place and hour he met to his death.” In contrast, the film has less main characters. Therefore, both have a suspenseful mood, but the novel has a more suspicious mood while the film has a more dramatic mood.
Eat, Pray and Love by Elizabeth Gilbert Eat Pray and Love is a really good book written by Elizabeth Gilbert. Years after the book was published the movie was made. The movie and the book have some similarities and some differences. They basically have the same story with events rearranged differently and events cut and added. This happens because a movie has to tell the entire story in a certain period of time, in this case 145 minutes.
Yea, but the movie just isn't as good as the book. I don't hate the books nor do i hate the movie I'm just not fond of them. The book uses words that are odd, and confuse me. It gets really boring at parts that i don't think should be there. The book is ok i love the way Jack London tell it from third person, and the way it is although the book.
The former is a somewhat true story made into an unlikely play and movie. Sadly, Richard Holden