ipl-logo

Hate Speech Meaning

930 Words4 Pages

Meaning of Hate Speech and it’s Harm

The most number of time hate speeches are given in India is when there are religious conflicts in the country. There is much harm which can be caused through hate speech. The comments which are based on racism bring minorities with a negative attitude and I harmful to them. Timothy Garton Ash said that if the speaking would be allowed without any legal constraint then it will become an uncivil speech. He said that nothing should be allowed which can harm someone related to race, Religion sexuality or ethnicity. “Don’t be fooled into thinking you are welcome here. The society around you may seem hospitable and non-discriminatory, but the truth is that you are not wanted, and you and your families will …show more content…

The two recent cases of Supreme Court of India have mostly focused on the hate speech and how it is related to the politics. The famous controversial rulings of Hindutva Judgement were reviewed by the court on 30th January. Whereas by March 12th the court stated that political hate speech should be cut down. There is a battle going on between free speech libertarians and liberals. The libertarians wants that the swear allegiance must be given to the Hindu right which includes BJP. The Latter wanted to make Narendra Modi the prime minister of India.

“The best test of truth is the power of thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market” …show more content…

These restrictions are related to content based restrictions. As a result hate speech is lawfully prohibited whereas in United States of America the prohibitations of some speeches related to racism have been found invalid. The restrictions which are related to racial and religious have been upheld in India. Such measures are taken so that communal harmony must be maintained.

Nazi demonstrations are prohibited in India on the grounds of public order. The deliberate intentions of outraging the religious feelings can disturb the public order. There is a lot of difference between India 's Constitution and the United States of America 's Constitution. By looking as India 's Constitution it looks that India 's Constitution preserve the rights of minorities whereas the aim of the state is to promote the welfare of the people.
One should not consider that Indian judiciary is as free as American judiciary. In the case of Raj Kapoor vs. State it was stated that “‘The world’s greatest paintings, sculptures, songs and dances, India’s lustrous heritage, the Konarks and Khajurahos, lofty epics, luscious in patches, may be asphyxiated by law, if prudes and prigs and State

Show More
Related

  • Chief Joseph's Letter To My Father Case Study

    1634 Words  | 7 Pages

    “I said in my heart that, rather than have war, I would give up my country. I would give up my father’s grave. I would give up everything rather than have the blood of the white men upon the hands of my people” (Chief Joseph, 1879 Speech to Congress, Line 78-80, P55). In this case, Chief Joseph had several big decisions to make at the time. After his father’s passing his biggest words to him was that he better not backs down and let the white man take the land with our ancestors.

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass's Role In Social Media

    885 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hate speech is defined as: speech that attacks, threatens, or insults a person or group on the basis of national origin, ethnicity, color, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability. While the United States has the bill of rights and the freedom of expression/speech some states do have speech provisions such as California. There are laws that label speech as ‘limited classes’ which could cause one to be sued in a court of law and that would include: lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or “fighting” words – those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. All other speech is protected under your first amendment rights. Refer to a legal expert when in

    Read More

  • Hate Speech College Campuses

    1116 Words  | 5 Pages

    I will argue for speech codes on college campuses because they create more good than harm to students on college campuses. The two reasons in support of speech codes on college campuses are that hate speech is prohibitive to a learning environment and secondly that hate speech does cause harm to the person or persons being attacked. The strongest objection against speech codes on college campuses is that speech codes are illegal because they infringe upon the rights of US citizens because of the US Constitutions first amendment. My first reason for speech codes on college campuses is that hate speech is prohibitive to a learning environment. My reasoning for believing so is because the primary purpose of colleges/universities and general education is to promote learning and knowledge while individuals can broaden their mental horizons and develop their own opinions.

    Read More

  • Essay On First Amendment

    473 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hate speech needs to be

    Read More

  • First Amendment Bill Of Rights

    155 Words  | 1 Pages

    However, the right to free speech is not absolute. The United State Supreme Court has ruled that the government can ban some speeches that contain “fighting words,” and words that

    Read More

  • Hate Crimes In America Today

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before it is possible to find a solution to the problem, it is necessary to get to know the problem better. By definition, a hate crime is a crime motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudice, typically one involving violence. According to FBI data, 60% of hate crimes are motivated by racial bias, which are composed of mostly anti-black crimes, followed by anti-white crimes, then anti-hispanic crimes. 20% of hate crimes were against religious groups, with anti-semitic crimes being most common, with crimes against Muslims following close behind.

    Read More

  • Charles Lawrence Racist Speech Summary

    770 Words  | 4 Pages

    Charles Lawrence in his racist speech tries to convince that racist speech needs to be regulated. He argues that hate speech is intolerable in the United States because it represents discrimination which Everyone defines hate speech differently. I define hate speech as anything that incites aggression regarding one person or a group of people. Now a day’s people uses free speech as a defense for saying anything but discriminating someone is not free speech.

    Read More

  • Pros And Consequences Of Obscenity

    1051 Words  | 5 Pages

    State of Maharashtra . In this case, it was held that acceptance of the viewpoints of those whose thinking may not accord with the mainstream are cardinal values which lie at the foundation of a democratic Government. Further, in S. Rangarajan v. P.J.Ram , the Supreme Court approved the observations of the European Court of Human Rights, that freedom of expression protects not merely ideas that are accepted but those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any other sector of the

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Derek Bok's Free Me: Racist Speech

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    After mentioning why racist speech is wrong, Lawrence comments “I also have a deeply felt apprehension about the resurgence of racial violence and the corresponding rise in the incidence of verbal and symbolic assault and harassment to which blacks and other traditionally subjected and excluded groups are subjected”(72). Putting emphasis on how racist actions hurt others is important for the reader to comprehend. Furthermore, the idea of free speech “reinforces our society’s commitment to tolerance as a value”(71). Gives choices to each individual to decide who and what they stand for, no more pandering and watching what others do. As a result, free speech brings community together as a whole.

    Read More

  • Racist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    If someone is going to have a conversation with another person, than their freedom of speech should be protected, however; if someone had the sole intentions of causing harm or discomfort to the person that they were speaking with or at, then their freedom of speech may not be so protected. This should be of no concern to any persons on a college campus who are worrying about their right to freedom of speech or expression being neglected, considering that speech codes only work to prevent harm inflicted by hate speech to all students. I agree with Lawrence in that if we are going to end racism, we, as a society, have to take small steps in protecting minority

    Read More

  • Robin Lakoff Hate Speech Analysis

    151 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Robin Lakoff’s “Hate Speech”, Lakoff claims that not everyone is able to understand hate speech because not everyone goes through it, or they don't find it a big deal because it doesn't happen to them. Someone might claim that they know that hate speech doesn't happen that often but, what is hate speech? Hate speech is to “promote violence” and it is “created by people who are a majority of the population; directed toward people who are a part of a minority population.” (bsu.edu). The First Amendment allows people to speak what they want, and express themselves.

    Read More

  • Should Hate Speech And Should It Be Protected Under The First Amendment?

    285 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although hate speech is bigoted, hate-mongering, and can potentially lead to hate crimes, it should still be considered free speech. If citizens of the United States are not allowed to be verbal about their beliefs, whether or not they are offensive and hateful, then there is no use in allowing free speech. Placing limitations on free speech contradicts the First Amendment, therefore making it inaccurate and useless.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    The ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate

    Read More

  • Hate Speech: The Freedom Of Speech

    1318 Words  | 6 Pages

    The time in which we live is the age of communication and the speech or talking one of the important ways of communication and expression. There are different types of Speech and communicate, one of them hate speech. Hate speech means attacking a person or group based on different basis such as gander, religion, race, ethnic origin or nationality and disability. In the other hand, some of human rights treaties agree with freedom of speech or freedom of expression it could offend or disturb others so government of Countries placed laws of hate speech to avoid harms, troubles and problems. Over years Hate speech law became one of the most known laws in international law.

    Read More

  • Walmart Corporate Social Responsibility Study

    3018 Words  | 13 Pages

    "We are not in business to make maximum profit for our shareholders. We are in business...to serve society. Profit is our reward for doing it well. If business does not serve society, society will not long tolerate our profits or even our existence." Kenneth Dayton, former Chairman of the Dayton-Hudson Corporation 1.

    Read More

More about Hate Speech Meaning

Open Document