ipl-logo

The Milgram Study On Obedience

809 Words4 Pages

Do we, as humans, respond to authority figures when given a command to do something that we know is wrong or do we listen to our conscious and react on our morals and beliefs? I think this is what the Milgram Studies/Experiment sought to find out. According to the book on page 365, in 1963 Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram wondered how many people would resist immoral requests made by authority figures. From my understanding, this psychologist performed experiments to study the obedience of people. These studies were called the Milgram studies on obedience (Rathus, 2013). After reading the book, I understand that the study had 40 subjects who had different careers and backgrounds such as teachers and high school dropouts. I thought that was different because I assumed the people would all be someone who is already in an authoritative position so it would come easy for them to obey commands given to them. According to the book, they were given a reasonable fee for their time to participate in the study. The experiment was explained to the subjects as the effects …show more content…

As we all know, there wasn’t any electric shock being administered but the teachers assumed it was. I think the issue is was it right to deceive the participants of the study. I honestly don’t think the results are accurate because they were deceived and they believed that the learner was being shocked by electricity. The people who were the teachers were being empathic because they thought they were hurting the learners in the study. I think I would have had a different reaction and would not have been able to send the first electric shock. I don’t like pain and I can’t stand to see others in pain. Also, another issue is did the participants feel pressured to continue. I think they may have felt obligated to continue with the study because they wanted to get pain and they wanted to be associated with

Show More
Related

  • In Cold Blood And The Milgram Experiment

    1043 Words  | 5 Pages

    This Milgram research on respect to authority figures was a series of cultural science experiments conducted by Yale University scientist Stanley Milgram in 1961. They assessed the willingness of survey participants, men from a different variety of jobs with varying degrees of training, to obey the authority figure who taught them to do acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to think that they were helping an unrelated research, in which they had to distribute electrical shocks to the individual. These fake electrical shocks gradually increased to grades that could have been deadly had they been true. McLeod's article about the Milgram experiment exposed the fact that a high percentage of ordinary people will

    Read More

  • Obedience In Stanley Milgram's 'The Perils'

    1262 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the experiment, Milgram uses purposeful deception as the teacher is the naive subject and is told they are participating in a memory and learner psychology experiment and are in charge of delivering shocks to the learner, who, in fact, is an actor. The majority of the participants in the study were obedient to the experimenter even though the experimenter "did not threaten the subjects with punishments such as loss of income, community ostracism or jail for failure to obey. Neither could he offer incentives" (Milgram 651). Despite having nothing to gain, the subjects continued participating in the experiment. The participants continued to administer shocks to the student because they were instructed to

    Read More

  • The Milgram Obedience Experiment: Logan Pratts

    927 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the experiment, the teachers were told that there would be no permanent damage done by the shocks, and when the experiment was over they were asked to rate the pain of the last shock they administered on a scale from 0 to

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Perils Of Obedience And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    1154 Words  | 5 Pages

    The only way for the teacher to end the experiment was to clearly disobey the orders of the experimenter (Milgram 579). One would think that most of, if not all, people would end the experiment immediately after the learner had any inkling of distress, but that was not the case. Instead, the teacher continued the torment so they could feel that sense of satisfaction that comes with following

    Read More

  • The Milgram Experiments

    992 Words  | 4 Pages

    He saw that the more personal, or close, the real participant had to be to the fake one, while they were being shocked, affected the obedience as well. He also noticed that if there were two other fake participants teaching that refused to shock their learners that the real participant would not comply. Finally, he tested the experimenter telling the real patient to shock the learner by telephone, instead of actually being there in person, reduced obedience as well (McLead). The Milgram experiment and the Nuremburg trials can relate extensively to explain how the Holocaust happened the way it did.

    Read More

  • Why Is Milgram's Research Important?

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    While arguably one of the defining psychological studies of the 20th Century, the research was not without flaws. Almost immediately the study became a subject for debate amongst psychologists who argued that the research was both ethically flawed and its lack of diversity meant it could not be generalized. Ethically, a significant critique of the experiment is that the participants actually believed they were administering serious harm to a real person, completely unaware that the learner was in fact acting. Although Milgram argued that the illusion was a necessary part of the experiment to study the participants’ reaction, they were exposed to a highly stressful situation. Many were visibly distraught throughout the duration of the test

    Read More

  • Obedience And Authority Theory Milgram

    1513 Words  | 7 Pages

    The study involved participants who were either assigned to the role of a teacher or the learner. The teacher had to give electric shocks to the learner every time the learner made a mistake. The experimenter firmly advised the teacher to keep giving electric shocks even when they wanted to stop. The results showed that when no oral feedback was given from the learner, all participants gave a shock of 450V. When the learner screamed or gave feedback, only 65% went to 450V. Milgram argued that the ‘teachers’ acted in this manner because they were told so by an authority figure (Milgram, 1963).

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    810 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the 1960’s Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments to test how a person reacts to authority. He started these tests in response to World War Two and the reports of the German soldiers who claimed they were “just following orders’ when asked about

    Read More

  • The Milgram Experiment Essay

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    For every pair that is incorrectly matched the voltage will go up, going all the way up to 450-volt shock. Also each time that the teacher is going to administer a shock they have to iterate the voltage amount. When the experiment begins nothing eventful occurs because the voltage levels are low. As the voltage starts going up we start to hear the learner making noises (uhg), initially the participant does not react. After it happens again we see the participant ask a question regarding the noise, but continues when instructed.

    Read More

  • Stanley Milgram Experiment Papers

    928 Words  | 4 Pages

    Name : Muhammed Irshad Madonna ID : 250509 Subject : Medical Ethics Due Date : 8/01/2018 Paper : 1-The Milgram Experiment The Stanley Milgram Experiment is a famous study about obedience in psychology which has been carried out by a Psychologist at the Yale University named, Stanley Milgram. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. In July 1961 the experiment was started for researching that how long a person can harm another person by obeying an instructor.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram

    1205 Words  | 5 Pages

    Switches were clearly labelled with voltage 15-450 volts. The teacher was actually naïve subject but Learner was an actor who didn’t even get a single shock. The purpose of this experiment was to see how far Teacher can go in the critical situation when shocks volts rise and Learner’s pain increased. Screaming and pain of the Learner made Teacher hesitating in proceeding far. To get freedom from this situation, Teacher must disobey to the

    Read More

  • Biological Factors Of Obedience

    1148 Words  | 5 Pages

    Again let’s take the facts and break them down on why a person would be so willing to do harm to another person like that. First there is a person who is viewed as an expert, a person of authority simply because he is wearing a white coat and has a clip board and repeatedly says the same phrase over and over again is instructing you to commit this act. There is a compensation of $4.00 being offered for just doing as your told and I could really use the money, after all I’m in the teaching chair not the learner chair I’m administering the shocks not receiving them. In this situation I believe it was a combination of biological factors as well as the situation that make the bad behavior come out. At any time that person could get up and walk out of the experiment, however something in their brain tells them it’s ok to keep going.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    The experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.

    Read More

  • Stroop Effect

    1024 Words  | 5 Pages

    Those that were not were introduced to our secure procedures (Appendix D) which led to the division process of the experiment. Participants were asked to pull up the chits themselves (Appendix C) and which randomly allocated and indicated them either into the control group or the experimental group. Before the experiment had been conducted, in both procedures of the control group and the experimental group, participants were told about the 24 sets of words (Appendix A/B), and were asked to read out the directions of the study. During the procedure, they were timed individually, one by one outside of the classroom where no distractions could occur which could have affected the results of the study. After the participants were timed, they were sent back together, and were debriefed (Appendix F) about the true aims of the study, and were told that the results were kept confidential and ethical considerations were taken care

    Read More

  • Stanley Milgram's Disputable Analysis

    1276 Words  | 6 Pages

    Respondents were told the trial would examine the impacts of discipline on learning capacity. They were offered a token money grant for taking an interest. In spite of the fact that respondents thought they had an equivalent shot of assuming the part of an understudy or of an educator, the procedure was fixed so all respondents wound up playing the instructor. The learner was an on-screen character functioning as an associate of the experimenter. "Instructors" were requested that direct progressively extreme electric stuns to the "learner" when inquiries were addressed mistakenly.

    Read More

More about The Milgram Study On Obedience

Open Document