The Millers Tale And The Reeve's Tale Analysis

Isaac couldn’t believe what he was hearing. Some ragtag group of rebels trying to break away from America? This was unacceptable. “Now, they have their reasons, Isaac,” Said his mother. “Don’t think they’re just a bunch of dumb evil monsters.

In my opinion, I think that the Reeve may be over reacting a little. No one else was offended by the Miller’s tale. Maybe that should tell the Reeve something. Perhaps the Miller did not mean to offend him. The Reeve has managed his lord’s account since his lord was twenty years old.

The Knight and Miller tale have similar characters which play very similar roles but with totally different personalities. The Knight's Tale is told by a famous person, and it is an historical romance which barely escapes a extremely sad ending (involves death or suffering). The Miller's Tale has a plot, but not themes. The Miller’s Tale is seen as a lower class point of view and it turns the knight’s idea of courtly love into a shorter, disgusting farce.

In the Canterbury Tales the Miller’s and the Reeve’s tales are very similar yet completely different at the same time. Both tales show how each main character gets swindled by their own family members. The Miller’s tale is a very raunchy story about the Reeve; while the Reeve’s tale is raunchy aswell as serving a lesson to the readers. Both characters told their stories to poke fun at one another in very trollop manners.

Femininity and Animal Motifs in Chaucer’s The Miller’s Tale The Miller’s Tale from Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales illustrates Alisoun, the sole female character of the tale, through comparisons of animals and natural life. There are implications throughout the tale that implicate that Chaucer was intending to represent the character’s sexual liberation as something that is innately possible in all women. In this essay, we will explore the ways in which the narrative structures Alisoun’s feminity, othering her from her male-counterparts in the tale.

The Miller’s Tale Authors Note: The purpose for this project is to explore the Canterbury Tales we’ve read in class, specifically the Miller’s tale that was originally printed in Old English. It is the intention of this speaker to explain the main plot points and themes and to modernize it for today’s youth understanding. The Canterbury tales date back to 1387 and may be one of the world’s first and best examples of band camp story sharing. A pilgrimage to a town rather than a march to the area’s best half time show is the commonly shared journey but like band camp, there are several different characters present and accounted for.

In The Miller’s Tale, a chapter in The Canterbury Tales, by Geoffrey Chaucer, women are dependent on men, and described as weak, and submissive. As a result, Chaucer portrays women as mere objects that can be possessed. Chaucer describes women as delicate beings. In “The Miller’s Tale,” when the Miller describes Allison, he talks about her personality:

In Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, there is no more humorous or more vulgar story than The Miller's Tale. This bawdy tale is the Miller’s answer to the Knight’s classy story of a love triangle. The Miller, who is portrayed by Chaucer as a strong rugged fellow who speaks and jokes loudly, mostly about sex. This description leads me to think of him as a member of the lower class, who, having had a more grungy and dirty daily life, is more comfortable around vulgarity than class. This preference is what caused him to respond with a story that directly mocks the utopian Knight’s Tale.

There are two tales that were studied during the reading of the Canterbury Tales. The first tale is called “The Knight’s Tale” and the second tale is called “The Pardoner’s Tale. The two tales from the Canterbury Tales did a significant job of ensuring that each tale had incorporated an essential set of morals that would be followed throughout each of the two tales. The two tales hold an equivalent amount of detail and both were successful in following the Host’s two rules. After careful consideration, “The Knight’s Tale is the winning tale according to the judgement of moral education and entertainment value.

He also utilized fabliaux to fill his stories with multiple sexual accounts that poke fun at the rules of courtly love. Chaucer’s humor had three main components – mockery, irony, and sadism. John, an older carpenter, with a young wife, is at the center of “The Miller’s Tale.” Chaucer mocks John for marrying a younger woman and the fact that their relationship does not follow the rules of courtly love. Courtly love suggests that jealousy strengthens relationships and equates to love.

In the novel “The Canterbury Tales,” author Geoffrey Chaucer uses a pilgrimage to the grave of a martyr as a frame for his tale. He introduces a multitude of different characters with unique quirks, all from separate walks of life. One of these characters, the Host of the Inn, sets up a storytelling contest in an attempt to keep the entire group entertained. The first two tales that have been examined thus far come from the Pardoner and the Knight. The two tales were vastly separate in terms of morals, motives and entertainment.

My fellow travelers, now that we have reached the end of our tour of the countryside, and have heard the last of these tales, it is time that I reveal a victor. A good friend of mine, Geoffrey Chaucer, has been recording your stories, and has compiled them into what he calls The Canterbury Tales. Last night, while the rest of you lay asleep, I reviewed the stories which each of you told, and I have concluded which story I believe was most befitting of the title of, “fullest measure of good morality and greatest pleasure.” This, as a surprise to some, I declare, is the tale told by the Miller. As I, Harry Bailey, proposed before, you all will all owe him a dinner upon our eventual return to the Tabard Inn.

Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press). The insight into marriage that Chaucer provided us with is not all negative though. Love is a celebrated recurring theme in The Canterbury Tales. He paints the picture that a immense part of marriage in the Medieval period was the emphasis on mutual love (Macfarlane, A. (1986). Marriage and Love in England

Chaucer creates a very clear image of the Miller and the impression given through his physical features suggest that he is rather ugly. Chaucer portrays the Miller as physically repulsive which leads us to believe he is immoral and a bad

Above all, Chaucer shows how people in high positions are not always what they appear to be to the public. Knowing this, the reader can better understand the quality of life during the Medieval Age, when men and women from all levels of society came together for pilgrimages. Thus, Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales is a classic because it focuses on all the aspects of society from rich to poor and good to