Frias 4
Some people might think of Shakespeare?s story The Tempest as just that, a story about a man who has his position as Duke of Milan usurped by his less than pleasant brother. However, after a careful analysis of The Tempest, it is easy to see how prominent the mistreatment of Caliban is throughout the story. This analytical essay will attempt to show that Caliban?s character is portrayed as monstrous, and the abuse imposed on him is easily justifiable because The Tempest was influenced by the culture and events that were present at the time that Shakespeare wrote this story.
We first hear of Caliban in Prospero?s conversation with Ariel and right off the bat we know that Prospero has a disdain for Caliban when he offhandedly comments
…show more content…
Prospero allowed Caliban to live with Miranda and himself until Caliban violated his trust. Miranda also tried to teach Caliban to be civilized much like the English wanted to teach the Native Americans to be civilized. She reminds him, ?I piteed thee, Took pains to make thee speak, taught thee each hour one thing or another? (Shakespeare 26). Miranda?s initial treatment of Caliban appears to be modelled after the way the English colonies treated the Native Americans initially.
The English soon began to see the Native Americans as savages who were unworthy of owning the land that the English wanted. They believed them to be uncivilized savages and they claimed things about the Indians that were not true and in order to classify them as savages. The English manipulated the way Native Americans were perceived because they wanted the land that the Indians had. Similarly, those who cam to the island in The Tempest saw Caliban as a savage, Prospero even took control of the land that was once
…show more content…
and the Natives were seen as an obstacle that needed to be removed (Takaki 202). This portrayal facilitated the taking of Native American land which eventually translated into the taking of Caliban?s land in The Tempest. The English people of the 1600?s believed that their lifestyle was the only correct one. They felt entitled to diminish people who did not live like them, and they did so with the Native Americans. They exploited them by taking their land, kidnapping and enslaving their people, and by degrading them. This can somewhat be seen in The Tempest when is noted that Prospero has fancy clothing and books to read, he was trying to hold on to what little civilization he had left. He too was afraid of becoming uncivilized like the island native, Caliban.Much like Asma?s essay appears to suggest, the English and Prospero demonized Caliban to set a clear boundary between what they were and what they were not. They felt as though they needed to establish that boundary for fear of unknowingly crossing over to the savage
The colonists were taking the Native American's property and taking advantage of the native Americans in the trade by getting them drunk so they could get more land. King Philip, the religious leader the Native Americans.
The Natives learned how much of a threat the Englishman can be causing two major rebellions to take action. Because of these actions, Englishman grew more hatred and fear toward the Natives causing different opinions to be formed. This can be seen in Rowlandson’s description of captivity showing some fear toward the enemies which had yet to be established when Columbus first encountered the Natives. Alongside the roles of gender causing slight differences in perspective. Though after learning the mentalities and differences between these two timeframes, it should be easier to understand how the mind 600 years ago made
Shakespeare also explores the theme of forgiveness through the subplot involving the character of Caliban. Caliban, who is initially depicted as a savage and brutish creature, is mistreated by Prospero and his servants. However, Prospero acknowledges Caliban's humanity, he says, "I forgive thee, / Unnatural though thou art." (Act V, Scene I).
In addition to Caliban, Prospero's yearning for vengeance also creates internal issues for himself. After Ferdinand and Miranda announce their marriage, Prospero claims his "rejoicing / At nothing can be more," because he must "perform / Much business appertaining," (Shakespeare, 95-99). Usually, a father focuses more on his daughter getting married, however Prospero can only focus on his plans for vengeance. Some believe that the characters internal struggles were caused by the wrongdoers, and not a lack of forgiveness; however, at the end of the play, after Prospero becomes a more virtuous character, his conflicts with his brother and Caliban are resolved, clearly showing that their focus on vengeance is what caused the internal struggles.
Caliban lost control of his island to Prospero when his mother passed
In conclusion, both plays demonstrate tension between what are implied to be wild and civilized realms. However, The Tempest is much more assertive in its consideration and the question of which character represents civility is much more predominant. Montaigne’s essay undoubtedly inspired Shakespeare’s sympathetic portrayal of Caliban as the isle’s peaceful native and Prospero is characterized throughout as a colonizer, thus questioning the legitimacy of what he deems “civilized”. Although King Lear too draws on tension between what is considered wild and civilized, the boundaries are blurred; it appears Shakespeare contrasts both location and characterization to emphasize the potential for corruptibility in both realms. Nonetheless, The Tempest
Ironically, it is Ariel, one of Prospero’s servants, who convinces him of this, and still, Prospero pursues the title of Duke of Milan by having his daughter Miranda, and Ferdinand, the son of Alonso, marry, uniting the two families peacefully (The Tempest William Shakespeare). Prospero’s new peaceful plan works perfectly, and he becomes the rightful Duke of Milan as he had planned. He then ends the cycle of power once and for all by forgiving all of his enemies and not punishing them, giving them no reason to want revenge (The Tempest by William Shakespeare). He then releases his slaves, giving them their freedom, which is all that they really wanted anyway, and vows to give up magic to return to the mainland, “But this rough magic I here abjure… I’ll break my staff, bury it certain fathoms in the earth, and deeper than ever did plummet sound I’ll drown my book” (Shakespeare, 5.1.3). Sometimes an author places some of their own beliefs into a story by creating a character to represent themselves, and it is believed that Prospero is supposed to represent Shakespeare after he escapes this illusion of justice.
Both characters are considered as rebellious savages that are controlled, Caliban by Prospero and John by the World State. The Tempest can be interpreted as a play about colonialism because when Prospero arrived at the island, he imposed his own rules and put Caliban under slavery, just as Europeans when they took possession of the lands of Americans and enslaved them. From this point of view, Prospero and the World State are very similar because they both use their power to control over people and to preserve their own stability (Prospero using his magic and the World State using soma).
The natives were being forced into working without pay, they were being controlled, and even killed for not meeting deadlines. The Europeans took their land for resources, markets, power, and money, without considering the Africans needs at all. These conditions are not comparable to those of Caliban and Ariel in The Tempest. Prospero did not want power or money, or even to be on the island on the first place. He treated Caliban fairly, until he tried to rape Miranda.
Stephano and Trinculo are also representative of colonizers in The Tempest. In Act 2 Scene 2, Stephano and Trinculo are wandering around the island with Caliban. Though differently than Prospero, Stephano still attempts to reform Caliban—but through alcohol rather than English. Stephano tells Caliban to “Come, kiss” in reference to his drink (134. 2. 2.). This gesture could be seen as one to subdue and domesticate Caliban by lowering his inhibitions and making him more susceptible to Stephano’s conquest.
“A Tempest” is as a derivative of Shakespeare ’s play “The Tempest” by Aime Cesaire. Cesaire makes a number of alterations in his adaptation of Shakespeare’s “The Tempest”. These alterations have been made in order to outline the change in time eras between the two playwrights’ time of existence and to illustrate the great social change that occurred in these periods, mainly colonialism by the West, the subsequent theme of the quest for freedom as well as the theme of power that resonates throughout the play. This essay aims at exploring the similarities and to draw attention to the alterations made by Cesaire in “A Tempest” and the subsequent effects of these alterations on the audience.
The Tempest can often be seen as a play about colonialism primarily because Prospero came to the island that belonged to Sycorax, Caliban's mother. Prospero subdued her, ruled the land and placed himself as its new ruler. He had full control over everything on the island. Caliban actually loved Prospero at first and was fine with an autonomy but not slavery as he lamented: This island’s mine by Sycorax my mother, Which thou tak’st from me.
Unlike Shakespeare’s other main characters, he is much more enigmatic. In they play Prospero is portrayed as the rogue who seeks revenge on his brother Antonio for his treachery. In this Shakespearean comedy it becomes clear that Prospero is the heart of power on the island. Evidently Prospero has been wronged by his brother’s usurping which he could not control and now uses his magic as a tool for controlling the events that occur on island throughout the play. The theme of power in this play is hugely significant as it clear that the violence interrogated in this play is in relation to power and the abuse of that power by the protagonist.
As the play begins, it seems as if the massive tempest is simply a random occurrence, catching the mariners and nobility by chance. However, as the act continues, Shakespeare reveals that the tempest was actually the work of Prospero and his ghostly servant Ariel, who stirred up the seas and set fire to the masts (1.2, 193-194). This establishes Prospero as the executor of a mess of ‘coincidences’ ranging from Ferdinand stumbling upon his daughter Miranda to King Alonso and his party walking directly into the former duke’s cell. Though Prospero may have the same control over the English language as the other characters, Caliban points to his specific source of power. He says, “… for without [his books] /
In comparison, the inconsistency between diction depicts the power dynamics observed in the play. Shakespeare often uses Prospero’s servant, Ariel and slave, Caliban to portray the differences in the hierarchy of the play. As observed by the audience Prospero often uses threats and insults to communicate and assign task to Caliban, hence “...tonight thou shalt have cramps, side stitches that shall pen thy breath up. ”(I.ii.325-326) Prospero threatens Caliban with pain after his refusal to do work, because he feels as if the isle belongs to him due to the fact that it was inhabited by his mother first.