The author states that, “while less recognizable to our eyes, Shakespeare’s audiences, many of whom were intimately familiar with religious drama and saints’ plays, would have noticed Richard III’s hagiographic tropes, themes, and allegories, as well as recognized the narrative arc and structure as that of a saint’s story” (Pomerleau 73). Here the author is trying to reach the audience using some pathos, and also some logos, to explain why the audiences of Shakespeare’s day understood what he was trying to accomplish with his play. It is certainly understandable that time and place has an effect on how someone will take a story. So according to Pomerleau, the point and goal of Shakespeare in his play on Richard III was not to accurately depict the king, but to make him a necessary evil and a villain for the sake of his anti-hagiography. The author continues to gives his reasoning for how hagiographies apply by stating, “Early Tudors’ and Shakespeare’s Richard, as well as the contemporary Richard III Society’s depiction of him, have made no discernible changes to hagiographic conventions” (Pomerleau 79).
The works that are attributed to William Shakespeare portray wisdom, imagination, experience, and education which go beyond his abilities as there is no sign in his local grammar schools of him ever attending. Evidence has no shown that there is no sign of Shakespeare attending his local grammar school. At that time, Education
For centuries, many around the world have loved Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets. Most who lived to witness his performances did not challenge his abilities; they only cared for his capacity to write intriguing fiction. Decades after his death, presumptions arose to challenge Shakespeare’s identity and authorship. Claims he was not the kind of man able to produce great writing emerged for different reasons. Since the first conjectures, many scholars and historians give their opinions on the Shakespeare authorship controversy, and contribute names of several candidates who may have been the real Shakespeare.
(Shmoop Editorial Team) If you’ve ever read any of Shakespeare’s plays, they’re all quite well written, including proper grammar, metaphorical phrases, and many other good writing techniques any good writer may know and see frequently in other English pieces. William Shakespeare came from an illiterate household, and growing up with parents, mother Mary Shakespeare, and father John Shakespeare, whom were both presumably illiterate as well as his sisters Susan and Judith. Many scholars would argue after coming to light that Shakespeare came from a household where everyone lacked a proper education for such success, that there is no possible way he himself can have such writing skills. The following
He emphasizes that a rude female will be nothing compared to what perils he has faced in his manly lifetime. With this specific character, Shakespeare represents the male importance of dominating a female and self-promoting masculinity. The Renaissance Era depicted men as the superior sex, and men were eager to emphasize their masculinity and dominance over females, as Shakespeare illustrated in his play Taming of the Shrew. Shakespeare also demonstrates these expected gender roles in Kate’s wedding speech at the end of the play. Kate proceeds to explain how valuable a husband is and how much effort and dedication they offer to their wife and in return the wife is expected to be submissive and servant to her husband.
For example, when Stephen Marche concludes his passage How Shakespeare Changed Everything, he comments that “Shakespeare created this category of humanity, which now seems as organic to us as the spring. In place of nostalgia and loathing, Shakespeare would have us look at teenagers in a spirit of wonder, even the spotty ones and the awkward ones and the wild ones” (Marche). Stephen Marche is trying to tell us that Shakespeare’s creation of the adolescent has left people fascinated for centuries, even those that don’t seem normal. The quote supports Shakespeare being a part of the high school curriculum because leaving out a man who has invented an entire age group, as well as creating a massive contribution to modern English, would only hurt a freshman’s performance. Additionally, Stephen Marche mentions that “Nothing could seem more natural to us than the rebellion of teenagers, which explains why Romeo and Juliet has fit easily into twentieth-century pop culture” (Marche).
If Shakespeare was born previous to his birth then his works would have most likely been destroyed or cast out. During the time of the English Renaissance was perfect for Shakespeare because of all of life was being looked at in a new way and many people questioned everything. Although systems were being challenged they were not being as challenged as they
Shakespeare was a master of absorbing his readers into the story. His works are relatable and understandable, even despite the fact that they’re centuries old. Having such a connection with the readers should be a major goal of any writer or producer. Another example of Shakespeare’s works being used for inspiration is evident with all of the remakes of his works. There have been countless movie and book recreations, all stemming from one or more of Shakespeare’s 400 year old works, and the reason these stories are even around is because of the broad themes and relatable situations which continue to appeal to such a wide variety of people, even today.
The Winter’s Tale Characterization has a strong role in many plays that script writers had written through the many of years plays have been around. Shakespeare has an amazing way of using this technique to bring out the significance of characterization. From Macbeth to Julius Caesar, were just a few of the miraculous plays that he had came up with. “The Winter’s Tale“ is a example that Shakespeare created, to truly show the strong separation and similarities in all characters of the play. Besides the famous play “Romeo and Juliet,” Shakespeare really focused on history during the two decades he had started playwriting.