Tola Ibikunle
The moment of duplicity in the Watergate scandal did not occur when G. Gordon Liddy, the general counsel on the Committee for the Re-Election of the President (CREEP), conspired with other members of CREEP to engage in illegal activities against the Democratic Party. Nor did it occur, when five burglars reattempted to wiretap phones in DNC headquarters on June 19, 1972 after a botched first attempt. No, the moment of duplicity occurred much later. The Watergate scandal is an important topic of discussion because it changed the political landscape and the way Americans viewed both the presidency and the government in ways that are still seen today. By analyzing the exact moment of duplicity in the Watergate scandal, the effects
…show more content…
In 1966, 65 percent of Americans trusted the government in Washington that number fell to 61 percent in 1968, and 53 percent in 1970 (Schneider). Even while more information was becoming available about the corruption of the Nixon administration, many people believed that newspapers like the Washington Post and television networks were exaggerating the level of corruption within the Nixon administration (Finney). For example, at the time of Haldeman, John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s chief domestic adviser, and the attorney general’s, Richard Kleindienst, resignation House Minority Leader Gerald Ford, and later President Ford, said that “I have the greatest confidence in the President and I am absolutely positive he had nothing to do with this mess,” (Stern and Johnson). By this time of Ford’s statement, the FBI had already established that the break-in was conducted by Nixon’s reelection campaign, acting FBI director L. Patrick Gray had been giving John Dean daily updates on Watergate and had destroyed incriminating files (History.com staff). Ford’s statement showed that the American people believed in their president and gave him the benefit of the doubt even when there was unsurmountable evidence brought against Nixon. Furthermore, by placing so much faith in Nixon, many Americans and the White House denounced the Washington Post’s coverage of Watergate as biased and misleading. Americans felt that the Post was trying to depict their “truthful” president in a negative light; however, the Post writers Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein were engaging in Plato’s dialectic approach to uncover the concrete truth of the Watergate scandal. On the other hand, most other Americans were concerned with the rhetorical truth. Based on the actions of past presidents, it was more plausible that when the president, the person they elected into a second term told the American people
The Watergate Scandal eventually led to President Nixon’s resignation from office. Before his re-election, a group aptly coined CREEP, illegally broke into the Democratic National Committee office to steal information to use in the upcoming election. Nixon tried to cover up the incident by denying his involvement in the crime. His top aides, including his Vice President Spiro Agnew, resigned to avoid giving anything away that would connect Nixon to the Watergate Scandal. The only piece of evidence seemed to be Nixon’s recordings of all conversations had by him in the White House; however, Nixon refused to give up the tapes, claiming Executive Privilege.
The picture coming into focus bears a striking resemblance to Watergate where the real trouble centered on the coverup of crimes more so than the crime itself. In The Crucible, Abigail made this statement just before she started her accusations: “I danced for the devil; I saw him; I wrote in his book; I go back to Jesus; I kiss his hand.” Abigail, McCarthy, Nixon and Trump have this in common: they have all made deals with the
On July 17, 1972, the Watergate hotel, the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee, was broken into by five men. After being caught, it was found that these men carried top of the line surveillance equipment. It was also found that these men had ties to the committee to re-elect Nixon as President of the United States, and this discovery eventually led to the ironic impeachment of President Nixon. Although the Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated the break-in, it was Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, two common reporters from the Washington Post, who cracked this case wide open. This team, nicknamed Woodstein, went above and beyond, not only covering the break in, but traced why it occurred all the way up to the white house.
In 1974, former President Nixon resigned from office and Gerald Ford became the temporary president. One of the first executive orders that Ford did was pardon Nixon for his crimes against the United States. The entire scandal had, “driven a stake into the heart of traditional national politics.” (Farber, 27) This controversy was not only publicized nationally, but severely damaged the American people’s already withering relationship with their government.
Eventually, when Nixon went to trial the judge asked him to hand over the tapes there were parts missing, which showed the country that he was covering up something. These tapes would show that Nixon had acknowledgement of the break-in a week before it even happened. The judge ended up convicting Nixon with three felonies, federal crime, abusing presidential powers, and keeping evidence. Furthermore, Nixon was forced to resign from the presidential seat and handing over the seat to Gerald Ford, who is the only president to not be elected as president
Watergate Scandal” A scandal erupted during Nixon's Presidency known as the Watergate, Nixon Scandal. To attain information about the Democratic Party's campaign plans for the next term, Nixon had sent plumbers to insert bugs in the Democratic National Committee headquarters, which would end up causing a scandal that would affect the American public. At first, Nixon refused to give in tapes of his conversations, but printed versions of the rephrased tapes were later disclosed by Nixon, although filled with deceptions. Important evidence was found after the Supreme Court said that Nixon must surrender his genuine tapes.
The Watergate scandal was one of the most infamous political controversies in American history during the early 1970s. It uncovered a web of lies created by former president Richard Nixon. The Watergate Scandal affected the trust of US citizens to the government by spreading false information, obstruction of justice, and deceiving politicians to cover up his tracks. President Nixon has instilled a distrust between the people and the government that will leave its mark for years. During the 1968 election, President Nixon had won by a landslide vote against the democrats.
Question 7 (for 10 points): After Nixon was connected to the break-in of the offices of the DNC at the Watergate business complex, in part due to the affiliation of his connection to one of the burglars, who was an employee of Nixon’s Committee for the Re-election of the President (CREEP), it gradually became apparent that the Watergate break in was largely a result of Nixon’s beliefs concerning the degree of latitude his office afforded him with regards to transgression of federal law. As the result of an investigation by a senate committee prompted by the Watergate scandal, it was discovered that during his presidency Nixon had committed a number of crimes, which included “extending political favors to powerful business groups in exchange
Introduction The Beginning of the White House Plumbers: A Brief History The Watergate scandal is widely regarded as one of the most significant political scandals in American history. The scandal resulted in the resignation of President Richard Nixon and left a deep impact on American politics. One of the key players in this scandal was the White House Plumbers, a group of individuals tasked with stopping leaks from the White House and investigating Nixon's political opponents.
It is not common for the FBI, a well-known professional bureau, to make mistakes during serious investigations. However, in recent years, the FBI has been mislabeling, misplacing, not returning important evidence, and has had flaws in the process of their DNA analysis that affects multiple incidents. Although, policies exist for safeguarding evidence within the FBI, too often mishandling still occurs, leading to wrongful prosecutions, dismissal of cases, and a weakened reputation for the agency. The FBI’s responsibility is to collect evidence to solve crimes, but to prevent them from occurring in the first place. However, if the prevention of crime, corruption, and terrorism revolves around gathering and protecting evidence, why is mishandling
Upon the discovery of the break-in, those in close operation with Nixon faced the various charges from committing and covering up the crimes that became known as the Watergate scandal. It is an undisputed fact that Charles Colson participated in defaming Ellsberg by hiring E. Howard Hunt to find slanderous information on him. Some people believe Colson should not plead guilty in the Ellsberg trial’s charges, while others feel he should plead guilty. Colson should plead guilty to the Ellsberg trial’s charges given three reasons: it dismisses Colson’s
The infamous checkers speech came as the result of an accusation of corruption, foreshadowing President Richard Nixon’s lengthy struggle with candor. 20 years prior to the scandal that changed the way the American people viewed the federal government, Nixon had the ability to utilize the modes of persuasion to his advantage, with few attempts being made at uncovering any discrepancies. This essay will explore his application of ethos and pathos in the first part of the checkers speech and how it enabled the American people to resonate with his narrative, with logos being far less of a factor. Establishing credibility in a case of potential corruption is seemingly impossible; however, President Nixon’s utilization of ethos throughout his
The thirty seventh president’s tone throughout the speech was genuine and anguished. He stated frequently his regret towards his resignation; when this passage is read aloud, it is stressed heavily on pathos and that Nixon defended his decision with the selflessness of his own emotions and did what is better for the country (“American”). In his speech, Richard Nixon establishes his credibility and then goes on to show the logic of why he is resigning along with sparking the reader’s emotions in defense of him through the use of frequent fallacies and rhetorical devices. Nixon goes on to speak of his accomplishments and the tasks he hopes the American people will achieve with a new president, but those ideas are shadowed by the steady reminders by Nixon himself of the circumstances that are causing him to resign the Presidency that overall make Nixon’s arguments to logic and his credibility seem
Richard Nixon was the 37th president of the United States; he resigned as president after his involvement in the Watergate Scandal. People broke into the Watergate building to wiretap phones and steal secret documents. Nixon knew about the break in before hand and tried to cover it up. When people found out about him trying to cover it up, he decided to resign as president. He gave his speech on August 8th 1974 and resigned on the 9th.
On August 8th, 1974 at exactly 9:01 pm, Richard Nixon--former President-- gave a speech that would affect both United States history and the american people. Richard Nixon’s argument and claim lay within the textual aspects, in other words, his tone, attitude, and the strategic ways of presenting to his audience. In this historical speech, Richard Nixon broadcasted his character, past decisions, and future advice to the people of the United States in order to justify his resignation from the presidential office. The rhetorical stylistic tools were effective and instrumental in backing up the argument. Recognition of audience was important, because it will determine his attitude and tone, which was innocence.