In his opinion, “The world is made up of two classes the hunters and the huntees (Connell 216)”. As a result of his wrong opinion, the tables turn in the story and Rainsford becomes the one being hunted. This is both his external conflict and an unexpected turn of events. Eventually, although this was tough for him, Rainsford ends up winning the game. When informed that he had won Rainsford responded: “I am still a beast at bay; he
Aswell, At the end of the story, Rainsford says, “I am still a Beast at Bay.”(The Most Dangerous Game) This shows that Rainsford has learned the theme of the story because when he says that he is saying that he is still a trapped animal that has to fight back. This shows that he now knows how it felt to be hunted, and to be trapped and having to fight back and take risks to survive. Before the events that occurred in the story Rainsford had no idea how the animals felt and didn’t care how they felt, but after those events he knew how they felt and thought while being hunted and definitely cared about how they felt because he knew how much it hurt
The narration and point of view of a story can cause the audience to form prejudices on the other characters of a story. The narrative this story showed General Zaroff as the antagonist, a major character, and the villain of this story. It shows Zaroff as the antagonist, because he hunts people since there are no more animals on the island and tries to kill the protagonist. “‘Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting.’ ‘Hunting?
Throughout generations, people have been hunting for food and population control, but in “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford thinks that hunting is a sport until he becomes the hunted. In the story, Rainsford met General Zaroff on the island; Rainsford thought he was a nice guy until he started hunting humans. Rainsford didn’t agree with him and refused to hunt, and he wanted to leave immediately, but Zaroff was started to hunt him. Rainsford uses his skills and knowledge to survive against General Zaroff. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell suggests to, trust yourself or you won’t succeed.
Furthermore, Zaroff will not bargain with losing the ability to hurt others for the reason of the thrill. In other words, Zaroff cannot be convinced that what he has been doing to humans is wrong. This can be a result of him thinking that he’s superior to all races. As the story of “The Most Dangerous Game” starts, the climax first occurs when Rainsford finds out what the general considers as the biggest hunt of them all. As Rainsford asks “Where do you get them”?
Short Story Character Analysis Essay Character traits of Zaroff in Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game Thesis: (arrogance/cockiness, skillful, insanity): The character General Zaroff, the disturbed antagonist from The Most Dangerous Game, portrays prominent traits including arrogance/cockiness, skillful, and insanity. The complex character seems like just an extreme hunter but figure out a horrifying fact, that he clearly is proud of, and doesn’t regret pursuing. General zaroff redefines hunting when he restocks his island with a new type of life. The character General Zaroff, the disturbed antagonist from The Most Dangerous Game, portrays some prominent traits including an arrogance/cockiness, skillful, and insanity. There is evidence
In the story, Rainsford stated “Hunting? Great guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of his murder.” (Connell 1.114) Rainsford values human life and while Zaroff thinks hunting humans is a “normal game”. Zaroff’s thinking is that humans could reason, which is why he refers us as the “most dangerous game”. Zaroff claims that hunting humans gives him pleasure. “Precisely,” said the general.
The Irony of the Hunter or Hunted In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell uses irony to reveal that what is said and done is not always what it appears to be throughout the story. In the beginning of the story Rainsford is very self confident and unsympathetic towards the game he’s hunting. Rainsford says, “ you’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher, who cares how a jaguar feels,” (Connell 1). At the beginning of the story Rainsford shows no sympathy for anyone, especially the game he was going to hunt. This is ironic because of the actions that take place later in the story where he is the one that is being hunted.
The premise of The Most Dangerous Game is that the main character has washed ashore onto an island owned by a retired Cassock general and hunting enthusiast, Zaroff. As time passes, the main character (a world renowned hunter himself) eventually finds that Zaroff hunts men like cattle, as hunting men the last thing that holds his interest. Zaroff is shown to be a sociopath, without regard for the value of anyone’s life but his own, and with no greater pleasure than murder. After this revelation, he sets out to hunt the main character, eventually failing and in turn being killed by the main
I realized that even the things that we hate doing the most, are absolutely necessary to us because they define who we are as a person, and they could bring us several benefits in the future. For example, the reason a person continues to go to school even if they hate it is because of the benefits they get out of it in the future. The benefits of this example would be related to a job or career, and eventually having the financial freedom, all by doing something that you temporarily despise. Basically saying that no matter how bad things are now, it will absolutely be worth it in the future. After having my watershed moment, I was offended by the fact that I was taught at a young age that we should only do things that we found fun and nonstressful.