Advertisers are influencing your children to eat anything, especially junk-food. They do this on TV, on the internet, and by studying the psychology and biology of children and tweens. To begin with, advertisers have a huge impact on children by showing the advertisements on TV. in the film The Myth Of Choice: How Junk- Food Marketers Target Our Kids “Ida,a little girl, is influenced by ads on television , her mom Anna Lappé says “Ads that target children are getting them to want and consume these unhealthy things.” this shows that television ads and shows are getting young children to eat these very unhealthy things that leads to these children to becoming obese. Not only are children influenced by the ads on TV but also these ads are on …show more content…
Young children, especially 3-7 years old, are influenced by the online games that they play. According to Marketing to kids gets more savvy with new Technology “ Isabella Sweet doesn’t wear a target on her chest. But kid marketers covet as if she does……. Perhaps it’s because she’s a techie.” Isabella plays on her tablet for an hour a day, she is still influenced by these ads, she plays on the Webkinzs website and is influenced by the ads she clicks on. This site actually posts ads when the children play on it.
“It posts ads that reward kids with virtual currency when they click.” this shows that not only are the advertisements trying to get children to eat fast- food but also to reward them “virtual currency” for their games by just clicking on the little ad. Moreover, advertisers are studying the psychology and biology of the children that watch the ads. The Myth of Choice: How Junk-Food Marketers Target Our kids says that “Fast food has been engineered to target Ida’s evolutionary impulses because fat and sugar are so hard to find her brain is evolved to want as much as she can get.” “ Watching these ads leads kids to prefer specific brands and triggers them to eat more calories.” To explain better, advertisers are genetically processing food so that children will eat more of it by studying the biology and psychology of these
Modern Americans are still motivated to spend on various products, whether they are useful and necessary or not, as the result of powerful mass advertising campaigns, widely broadcast through many forms of media. Children and young adults are usually the main targets for such campaigns. It is estimated that the average American child watches between 25,000 to 40,000 television commercials per year so advertising undeniably has a great power over the young minds, who in turn would influence their parents and guardians (Shah, 2010). More than 30 billion dollars are spent by families every year as the result of this strategy, which is progressively adapted by many companies (Shah, 2010). Additionally, thanks to these advertisements, people pay more attention to keeping up with the current trend, with what is considered the most up to date rather than the overall necessity of the product.
Even though there are same products on the shop shelves, people prefer to buy the food that has the labels of low fat or more nutrition. But these labels can be a big factor that causes people to live in an unhealthy way. According to the study published in Food Quality and Preference, it claims that people are more easily influenced by the labeling highlighted on the front of food packaging, particularly nutrition claims. For example, the obese people prefer the low-fat coke rather than other coke with regular sugar. This kind of nutrition claims gives people psychological comfort that makes them eat without worrying about being obese and unhealthy.
Companies should be banned from advertising to children because they are unable to understand the selling purpose, the long-term effects, and the unfair work labor. According to the American Psychologist Association, children under the age of eight aren’t mature enough and are unable to understand that the purpose of advertising is to get them to buy a product. Young children are likely to believe everything and anything they see and hear because they don’t know any better. There is so much of the world, that children haven’t been exposed to, therefore it could result into wanting to try it all.
Children don't see that some ads could be harmful to them. Kids also choose a product based on the packaging rather than what it actually is because they don't care what is in the package they just want it bdcause it looks
Advertisers target children by using cartoon characters to promote their product which will make the child want the product. Advertisers also target children by having famous sports stars or actors to promote their products. Advertisers will pay millions just to get kids hooked on their products. Advertisers are exposing children to dangerous amounts of advertisements every day and their finding new ways to get past parents. Advertising towards children has gotten so bad that the government is having to step in and new guidelines are being made to on how advertisers advertise to towards children.
The question of advertising aimed at children is complex, involving multiple factors of personal liberty and the protection of vulnerable populations. While some believe that businesses can regulate advertising, using it for benign and healthy promotion, others believe that it can be a tool for manipulating impressionable minds into buying unhealthy products. Although I believe that young people should be protected from manipulative or predatory forms of advertising, I do not believe it is feasible or advisable to regulate their access through legislation banning such advertisements. To begin, it is difficult, if not impossible, to conclusively say whether an ad is aimed solely at children. Adults and children often consume the same
Advertisements targeting children should not be banned in the United States for three reasons. First parents and children are intrested in the newest products for sale. Second children need to see advertisments for what they are. Third advertisments, teach children to be smart consumers.
As children grow up, they learn from their parents, teachers, other kids, and the media. The media has a huge impact on children today, and can absolutely influence them to make either good or bad decisions. It doesn't seem ethical to target children with ads because they don't understand what they are being shown. As it stated in the passage Protect Children From Targeted Advertising, "Targeting people who lack the capacity to make informed decisons is unetical. " Studies show that dogs have the brain capacity of a three year old, but people wouldn't expect a dog to make it's own decisions about what it needs based on flashing pictures on a screen, would they?
In “Consuming kids” marketing has now become a science of trying to get kids to consume as many products as possible by showing repetitive ads on not just television but on the internet where kids play games and watch movies on Netflix. Advertisements have been made more personal for children so they can relate to them, and this makes them beg their parents to buy them the new barbie or newly released video games like Overwatch. Children are big targets for advertisement companies. They make up forty billion dollars worth of sales, and companies do not think this is enough. They want children to live and breathe their products because they want more money pouring into their company for profit.
Commercials impact youth’s by getting youth’s attention to persuade them to get their parents to buy the product. According to the text “Facts about marketing children” the average American child today is exposed to an estimated 40,000 television commercials a year over a 100 days. American children ages 12-17 will ask their parents for products they have seen advertised an
In a world with tablets, smart phones, laptops, Xbox’s, Playstation’s, Wii U’s, and Nintendo 3DS’s the gaming/internet world has become as diverse as the world of television. The content available in video games range from shooter games, action games, adventure games, music games, and action-adventure games just to name a few. The content of games on the Internet add more to what is available for children. Now with the rise of Applications, the accessibility of these games has becomes easy for mostly anyone to get to. Video games available for children differ from the different age ranges, but for the purpose of this paper the main focus will children between the ages of 6-12 years old.
In “Consuming kids” marketing has now become a science of trying to get children to guzzle countless of products by showing repetitive ads that are not just shown on television, this includes the internet as well. What makes the internet convenient for marketers is the kind of advertisements they display. In order to grab a child’s attention, ad’s have tried to become more personal. Once advertisements add their personal connections, this will generate certain children to beg their parents to buy a new barbie or newly released video games like Overwatch. Some children will believe that the ad relates to them on a personal basis then become attached to it.
Advertisers target kids because they know children will, "associate junk food with having a good time,"(Junk Food Advertising is too Tempting for Children). Consequently, children will develop obesity because of the advertisers actions. In recent years, childhood obesity continues to rise because companies advertise towards children. Also, way more technology now than fifty years ago means more ways for companies to advertise. Advertising towards children, a method used by many popular companies, has a negative effect on a kids health.
Parents are not aware that many child friendly websites are making their children watch ads. For instance, in the article Marketing to Kids Gets More Savvy with New Technologies it states that the Webkinz website, "...posts ads that reward kids with virtual currency when they click. Every time a kid clicks on an ad, there’s a virtual ka-ching at the other end for Ganz, which owns Webkinz" (Horovitz 112). This method is tricking so many young people. These children that do not know that advertisers are taking advantage of them.