The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) considers college athletes to be amateur athletes, which means that they are not allowed to be paid by schools. Many people believe that college students and especially college athletes are overworked, which begs the question, how does the lack of payment of college athletes affect their well-being? College athletes are not allowed to be paid by their schools or depending on the state they are in, by others despite the amount of effort and profit they bring to the schools. This is unfair to the athletes because they have the stresses of being an athlete without any of the rewards of being an athlete. College athletes are negatively affected by their lack of payment because they aren’t fairly …show more content…
As is stated earlier, the NCAA considers college athletes to be amateur athletes, which means that they are only allowed to make money off of scholarships, cannot be paid by schools, and only in 20 states are students able to profit on their NIL (Name, Image and Likeness). This means that those students can’t be involved in advertisements, or run any promotions on their social media because it would be in violation of state laws. Since the students aren’t able to get paid a salary by colleges, and most aren’t allowed to profit off of their name, the only way that college athletes can make money for their sports is through scholarships, which usually not fully given to athletes, don’t help with food, room and board, or travel costs, meaning that college athletes are usually left with little money because they have to fund all of those expenses themselves. College athletes also have to be successful enough to be able to profit on their own. College athletes often report not having enough money to travel home and see their family (Compensation for College Athletes). This can also affect their well-being because they aren’t able to be around their loved …show more content…
College students should be paid for their work because they have to deal with the stresses of being both a student and an athlete. College students themselves are already very stressed, with the American College Health Association finding that 63 percent of college students report feeling overwhelming anxiety and 42 percent felt so depressed it was difficult to function (Improving College Students’ Mental Health). With a sport on top of this, which as previously mentioned takes up more than 40 hours a week, college athletes have to put in a lot of work during their time at
The debate of whether not college athletes should be paid has been going on for a couple decades now. With college institutions gaining revenue from football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, Dr. Dennis Johnson thinks that “There now is a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship” (2012). On the other hand, Dr. John Acquaviva is satisfied with the current college system in which colleges provide athletic scholarships which reward a free college education in return for representing the university’s athletic program (2012). Dr. Johnson then follows up Dr. Aquaviva’s claim with his five selling points for the paying of college athletes and Dr. Aquaviva provides five points
Therefore many college athletes are forced to pay out of pocket for certain items not covered on scholarship such as clothes, food, and gas. This is hard for many college athletes since themselves or their parents do not have the money for the extra items. A selected few athletes will get a chance to bring their family out of poverty and make a great living in either the NBA or the NFL. But for the not so lucky ones that end their careers at the collegiate level they should receive some money in order to pay for the expenses that any college student would need to since they do not simply have the time to get a part time job while enrolled in college and participating in their specific sport. The benefits that the players can receive from receiving a salary are endless.
They spend countless hours practicing, traveling, and competing, all while trying to balance their academics. Many of them come from low-income backgrounds and could use the money to support themselves and their families. Additionally, college sports generate a lot of revenue for universities, and it seems unfair that the athletes who are actually responsible for producing that revenue don't see any of it. However, there are some arguments against paying student athletes.
One of the reasons why college athletes should be paid is that they bring in a significant amount of revenue for their universities. As noted in "The Case for Paying College Athletes," “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million.” Text 1 line 1-3
Since Colleges come with additional expenses not covered by a scholarship, it only makes sense for these athletes to get paid so they have a way to pay these
College athletes undertake quite the journey the instant they make the decision to dive into that pool, shoot that winning goal, or fulfill whatever their heart desires. These talented athletes have to manage their academic life, their personal life, and their athletic life all at once, which can prove to be a fairly difficult task, and considering that the only financial benefits they receive from it are scholarships, its understandable why some might be a bit disgruntled that they are not paid directly. However, paying college athletes is in no way a good idea, as this could lead them to neglect their academic life, and even take a major chunk out of an entire college's funding. If colleges started paying their athletes, it could cause them
In his March Madness interview, Mark Emmert, the head of the NCAA, states how it would be “utterly unacceptable…to convert students into employees” (PBS). There would also be little to no difference between college and professional sports, and would fail to preserve the “amateurism”, as valued by the NCAA. Emmert justified this principle by claiming that “college athletes can’t be paid for their labor or commercial use of their names, images…because such pay would be exploitative” (O’Bannon). This arbitrary line between how college athletes are paid compared to their coaches and their performance on the field does little to fully explain to the extent to which college athletes cannot profit off anything during their college careers. While college athletes receive virtually little to no compensation for their contributions to their sports, their coaches can make up to an average of $1.75 million dollars.
Some people believe that all college athletes have plenty of time and don't deserve to get paid, while the other side believes that they put in lots of time and dedication, and deserve to get paid for the things they do. Also according to the article “This Study Proves Just How Much Time College Athletes Spend On Their Sports,” It states Student-athletes are allowed to dedicate a maximum of four hours per day, 20 hours per week during the season with one day off and eight hours per week in the offseason with two days off. While yes they do get some days off there still put in numerous hours, lots of time and dedication, and much more, Leaving them with little to no time to do anything else. So with that, they should be getting paid for all of the hard work and numerous hours they put
On top of a scholarship, student athletes are also provided with many free things such as game tickets, apparel and equipment. Although scholarships take off a lot of the cost to go to college, they aren’t enough on their own. Most scholarships are not full ride and students are left to pay some school fines. Student athletes need an income to help pay the extra money they owe that the scholarship doesn’t pay for, and also so that they have some money when they come out of college. Paying college athletes is a way to encourage students to play sports.
In today 's life college athletes are not pleased because they don’t get any compensation at all from their sport they are playing. There is a lot of similarities between professionals players and college athletes players like to broadcast of their games, they both can seen on the Tv or media. They both let people know the intense game that the players play, which gives the people a lot of excitement and grabs the people attention to pay for a ticket. Does it affect the college athlete to not get paid at all? Well according to some experts, it does because athletes need that money to pay college tuitions, to buy books, to pay apartment rent, etc.
"College athletes make their schools millions of dollars, so they should naturally receive a cut…everyone around them makes money. But the students (athletes)… receive nothing" (Drowzdowski). College athletes like Paige Bueckers, Azzi Fudd, and Aaliyah Edwards bring attention to Uconn. No one receives a single penny for all the gear and tickets sold with their names on them. The schools get money by selling these, so the school makes money off its athletes.
Although the common person may think that it is just a sport, it is much more than that. The time, dedication, and sheer effort that collegiate athletes must put in would be hard for anyone to manage. When the average college student is short on money they are about to go out and get a job so they can pay for their wants and needs. College athletes are different from a regular student in this aspect because they are unable to work a normal job due to their hectic schedule. In an article debating whether college sports are truly a job, Robert McCormick, a law professor at Michigan State, states “ ‘There are more demands put on these young men than any employee of the university’”(qtd in Cooper).
After graduating from High School one may choose to further his or her education through college. People do this for many reasons. Some people do it for professional benefits, while others do it for sports athletics. This paper will be focusing on those who do go to college for athletic benefits. Specifically, this is focusing on how these college athletes do not get paid and why they should be paid.
A study was shown by an economist that “ … Top-level college football players at the time generated a net gain of more than $2,000,000 over a four-year period.” ( Stanley 1) These athletes even have corporate advertisements being displayed in the arenas where they play but still give zero payoff to the athletes. They also make public appearances for their schools and their photographs are used to publicize the athletic department to sell tickets, but still do not receive any benefits other than fame. The schools compensate everything that these players do.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.