In World War II, propaganda was a tool the Nazis used to brainwash the German public into believing the reason for their loss in World War I was due to the Jews. With the lies and false information the Nazis continued to feed to the public, they were able to obtain a large and vicious following. Today, the U.S. faces a similar issue of lies and misinformation being spread and consumed by the public through the tool of partisan media. Partisan media is a problem that is unfortunately constantly ignored because many are unaware of just how detrimental the effects of partisan media could become if not addressed and stopped soon. It is deceiving many Americans and leading them to question what and whom they can trust. Partisan media is creating …show more content…
“The attack on the U.S. Capitol was based on a “Big Lie” about election fraud in 2020” (PBS). Violence is already stimulated by the lies partisan media is spreading and these attacks are only going to become increasingly maniacal. Furthermore, many believe that they are capable of avoiding the influence of partisan media because they can avoid it. “Hmielowski and Sparks examined readability, sentiment, and tone of partisan media outlets and found that non-partisan outlets are harder to read than extremely partisan outlets and that the patterns exist both on the right and left sides of the political spectrum” (ufl). Partisan media is easier to read which attracts readers and this ultimately leads them to fall victim to partisan media’s tricks. Unfortunately, people are unaware that they are being deceived by partisan media and are enacting violence based on fake news which is a substantial issue the U.S. is …show more content…
Partisan media has led many to often find themselves making an immediate assumption about someone's political affiliation just by looking at them. For example, someone may assume someone is republican if they are wearing a cross necklace and that someone is a liberal if they have blue hair. “By just seeing or meeting someone, people might immediately engage in partisan categorization and stereotyping without knowing anything else about these individuals.” (core.ac.uk). Partisan media has forced an image into people’s minds of what an average republican and liberal should look like and these stereotypes are only separating people more. Additionally, these immediate stereotypes people make are affecting Republicans' and democrat's ability to peacefully share a community. “44% of highly engaged Democrats and nearly as many highly engaged Republicans (38%) say it would be harder to get along with a new person in the community if they were a member of the other party.” (Pew Research). People are so consumed by political stereotypes that they immediately conclude they will not like someone if they have opposing views. The stereotypes partisan media is spreading are separating citizens of the U.S. People can’t see past these stereotypes and this is ultimately sending the U.S. backward rather than
The social group we are in is determined from a young age and is based upon values we learned within the home. Although we are not born a Democrat or Republican, ideological values lean us toward a political party. In class, we discussed that period forces can also have an effect on young people, but not enough to have them change party lines. The identity we developed is derived from our social groups, since certain religions, racial groups, education level, and even our economic class is associated with different political parties. Poorer people and racial minorities tend to vote Democrat, and college non-educated whites are increasingly become more GOP (lecture).
Politics. What does it do to us and our views of people? In “Divided We Now Stand,” Susan Page, the current Washington Bureau Chief for USA today, explains just that. She spends the article giving readers studies and insights as to how people oppose simply because the party says to oppose, and she shows us how people feel about opposing parties and treat them as a result of partisan views. In this article, Page has many good points and strategies, but her argument could be improved.
This is evidenced by the growth of small, often internet-based, media outlets that target a niche audience with a very specific ideology. For example, the online broadcast channel The Blaze mainly targets highly conservative millennials. By having these highly specific statements of opinion, people can only choose to affirm their beliefs and make them feel stronger about them. Thus, when statements of opinion are misused, the public becomes more divided in opinion and less open to compromising with other viewpoints. This can be seen today as increasingly opinionated news reporting has been a major factor in the growing political divide in the United States.
The book Bias written by Bernard Goldberg explains how the liberal media distorts actual news and as a result impacts society negatively. Goldberg joined CBS News in 1972 and retired 28 years later, in 2000. Goldberg describes the distortion in present day due to no diversity of opinion in the newsroom, so no matter how many news executives go on about diversity, about ethnic, and racial diversity and how much they say we need that to go out the full story about things, they don’t seem to care much about intellectual diversity or diversity of opinions. This is why journalist can bash on a certain side or cheer the other side and wont fear about what will happen. Goldberg views Conservative news as evil and liberal media as right.
Why Political Polarization Might be Good for America | US ... Retrieved March 26, 2017 Alan Abramowitz offers a differing idea from the majority which is that polarization could be healthy for a democracy. His reasoning is that since people are more engaged in politics that makes our political system heathier since it shows what each political party stands for, “It's healthier to have parties that actually stand for something than to have the situation that we had 50 or 40 years ago, when you really didn't know what the parties stood for because there was so much overlap between them” Poll Results: Behavior Leads to Polarization. (2017, March 21). Retrieved March 27, 2017, from
In “Political Polarization: Challenges, Opportunities, and Hope for Consumer Welfare, Marketers, and Public Policy”, Weber and the other authors state that “Political polarization is a marked political division in the population, characterized by multiple manifestations” (Weber para.1). An example of when the parties of American politics were extremely polarized was right before and during the Civil War era. Today, experts are noticing that the two major parties are becoming very polarized. Pew Research Center has conducted many studies and has shown that from 1994 to 2014, more Republicans have moved farther to the right while more Democrats have moved farther left. The article also stated that the two parties have grown more disdain for each other with negative views of each party rising (Geiger).
We hear Democrats blaming Republicans for legislative stagnation and the rise in unemployment. The main effect of these occurrences is known as party polarization, a phenomenon in the United States where the two main political parties are seen as polar opposites of each other and therefore highly discouraged from collaborating or uniting. Party polarization causes a person’s political beliefs and ideals to be defined by the political party they identify with. There are many reasons for this devotion to a party’s political standpoints, such as regional and/or cultural differences, the desire for an increase in each party’s power and influence by special interest groups, and the general narrowing of political parties into the two-party system.
With the political media, a vast amount of false information spreads in seconds, being seen by thousands because of the invention of the internet; however, many do not check the credibility of most sources they come across. This results in people believing misinformation spread online, especially if it reinforces their own political beliefs. Ultimately causing extreme separation between the two major political parties because of human’s nature to be angry, resentful, and hateful
First, the media can easily persuade the American people to think what they want for instance; in the movie Wag the Dog they make the public believe that they really are at war when everything they are showing is fake (movie). “The vast majority of journalists at these major outlets are generally liberal” and so if they are liberal they will write what they think about the situation (Washington Examiner). By them doing that they get all the American people to believe what they believe. “Some claiming that there is no such thing as media bias and that the republican candidates were just upset about the tough questioning” which is really just another one of the writers opinions. If they
Occasionally we all meet someone with contradicting view than ours, for it is in human nature to be in conflict. However, there are those occasions when someone’s views, whether they agree with the view held by one’s own opinion or not, are underdeveloped. They acquire what they read or see around them and take these as the only facts of the case. The opinions held are hardly their own, just fragmented compilations of others formed by the reported news on skewed media outlets. McCombs and Reynolds once reported in 2002 within an article on the influence news that, “News media may not be successful in telling people what to think, but they are stunning successful in telling them what to think about”.
There is the idea that the media is both biased and corrupt which ultimately will effect the views and beliefs of voters and society as a whole. When a
When people's attitudes are affirmed by partisan media then they are more likely to go the further extreme on whatever side they are on. However, when people watch political media that does not agree with or affirm their own biases and views they, similarly, become more polarized. According to Levendusky, “On average, exposure to cross cutting political media will polarize attitudes”(Levendusky 53). This hypothesis is called the crosscutting attitude hypothesis. He also makes the point that partisan viewers with more political knowledge will show the greatest tendency to engage in motivated reasoning, so they will be the most likely to polarize when shown partisan media.
The availability of mass media in the United States has grown throughout the last few decades. The media serves the vital function of informing citizens about political issues, yet there are certain media effects, like slant and framing, that can help political elites manipulate people by using mass media as a tool. Despite the dangers of media effects, mass media still does a good job of informing citizens about important political issues such as the Watergate scandal, Abu Ghraib, and the legalization of same-sex marriage. The Federal Communications Commission is an independent agency put in place by way of a congressional statue in which gives them the authority to regulate interstate communication.
When thinking of the media you think they are reporting the appropriate and accurate information not based on any personal opinions and feelings. Also one would not think the media would be reporting based on one side of politics or the other. The media is extremely biased when it comes to politics and news. While some of the media is conservative-biased I believe the mass media is liberal-biased. Majority of media outlets are liberal companies, media personnel and journalists will identify themselves as democrats and liberals more so than republicans or conservatives and lastly the left side (liberals) of the mass media is persuasive on what information to report.
If the media would report information as it happens with factual information, American would be left to interpret the data how they see fit. The Americans ' background and socialization will allow the information to be digested and interpreted in specific way. The media needs to be a platform to share information on a specific topic accurately, not a place to advance one 's