However, the ability to express creativity is vital in many jobs when students grow up. If students are not trained to be creative from when they are young, and only train for these standardized tests, it will be hard for them to survive in companies when they grow up. The above is one of the biggest problems about standardized test, but there are more. How well students of a particular class, or school, do in a standardized test, may affect the teachers’ income. If students do too badly, teachers may even be kicked out of school!
The new changes to the test should be in the best interest of the average high school student. Eric Hoover, a journalist for the New York Times, explains some of the changes that are being made to the test. The College Board states in the first paragraph, “Instead of being a riddle to solve, it would correspond with high school curriculums and better reflect what students have learned.” (qtd.
Question 6 Play is a child’s main purpose in life. Some might say that play is a child’s job. All play is not just for entertainment or fun; play holds many benefits for child’s cognitive development. However, play is also important for the development of the whole child not just mentally, but physically as well as emotionally.
What the students do not understand is that teachers are there to help them be successful in life. When students refuse to cooperate, it builds more stress on the teacher; the more stressed out a teacher is, the harder it is for them to prepare students for
Teachers and parents influences on a child’s academic development. Most of us wonder what or who exactly influences a child’s academic development, researchers believe that both sides play an equal role in a child’s academic development. According to Allen (2011, p.2), while it is recognized that parents and teachers play important roles in children’s lives and that teachers play a leading role in relation to children’s acquisition of academic skills and knowledge, the level of influence these key relationships have on academic performance scores in late childhood is largely unknown. This academic paper will explain the roles of each side and how it influences a child’s academic development.
Studies show that this numerical score, otherwise known as VAM (value-added modeling), is both unstable and unfair. The overwhelming tendency for the same teacher’s scores to fluctuate between multiple years concerns the critics of standardized tests and is a major flaw in the system. As stated by Diane Henningfeld, author of Standardized Testing- At Issue, “the true quality of a teacher is likely to change very little over time” (54). The current system, however, frequently penalizes educators when natural fluctuation occurs.
We assume that they know all about it, but the fact of the matter is that two thirds of teachers feel that they themselves are not experienced enough to use the technology they are to teach to their students. There are many other difficulties which teachers must cope with too. Things such as lack of resources, their own lack of knowledge and the necessary skills (which stems from being underprepared by the schools in the technological fields they are supposed to teach), failure of school leadership, teachers' own opinions towards new technology, and evaluations (which fail to take into consideration new expectations. Here are three essential items to consider before attempting to introduce new literacies to classrooms: 1.
Most people, especially teenagers, don’t like having to conform to large restrictions set forth by authority. Students are required to learn from a very structured curriculum, which in itself causes some apathy due to the abundant restrictions, and on top of that, it is a curriculum that won’t affect most of their futures. A revised curriculum that still has class requirements, such as being required to take four years of English classes before graduation, but offers more options for college-bound and non-college bound students, such as the option between an average English class a person would see in most schools now where students learn how to analyze literature and a class that teaches communication skills, would help to reduce apathy. By providing options, students would feel less forced by authority to conform and there would be a reduced gap between school and the outside world. In this revised curriculum, standardized tests would be strictly limited or diminished.
Many students are unable to understand basic math with the change in standards. As Mr. Hartle (Interview 2016) states, “students are better able to understand concepts, but it is time-consuming and they do not have the same level of understanding.” We can conclude from this that students are receiving a worse education. If a building does not have a good foundation, it will fall; education is the same way. Someone must understand the basics which common core takes away
Although, DAP may be more customized to each student, Common Core gears more towards intended child learning outcomes. One gap between DAP and Common Core is that Developmentally Appropriate Practice applies more to kindergarteners and years prior but there are no standards present beyond kindergarten. Therefore, language supporting DAP would be important in kindergarten and it was discovered that perhaps in first through second grade also. This leads to the first question of whether or not Common Core Standards were appropriate for young children. The use of Common Core and its focus on only two
This aspect has resulted into a decrease of time spent in the recess. As a result, children’s’ emotional, social, and academic well-being is compromised in the long run (Ricci 351). Moreover, the fact that the federal funds are only availed to schools which meet specific thresholds, have put schools under pressure to ensure that their students can meet the requirements through standardized tests. As such, schools spend much time evaluating the students’ performance such that whenever “the students are not sitting for the standardized tests, then they are being prepared to sit for the tests” (Kohn 47). As a result, students skip or neglect other important activities such as extracurricular activities such as games in order to prepare adequately for the
I also think educators are having the trouble with the rules because this is something new and challenges to their teaching skills. Educators have to grade students work entirely different and try to make sure the rules are working for them and the students. I believe as an educator knowing that these standards will not help the students stay focus with the materials because the state I am living in, the students are learning from a textbook, which make them complain about it and be confused on the materials from the book. From listening to my child, I believe as a parent and an educator, I think that students are not going to progress at the rate that Common Core believes that they should. I also think that students will retain their grade level because all of these tests they are taking to move to the next grade.
Another argument presented in favor of CCSS is how standards provide help developing better outcomes to improve achievement gaps that were a result of NCLB. Closely related to learning gap and opportunity gap, the term achievement gap refers to any significant and persistent disparity in academic performance or educational attainment between different groups of students, such as white students and minorities, for example, or students from higher-income and lower-income families. Achievement gaps hurts and hinders representation measurements of standards when it comes to developing these children and evaluating performance over a set