It is with much sadness that I regretfully inform you: the American language has morphed into a monster. What started off as a few harmless insults between friends quickly grew into something much larger and more dangerous than it was ever supposed to become. This monster grew and grew, harnessing the tongue and manipulating it to carry out its heinous deeds. Choosing youthful victims, this abomination attaches itself for life, continuing to grow as its host does. Soon the entire vocabulary of youth and adults alike is reduced to rubble, filled with pointless words; the sole purpose of which are to either offend another human being or cause them to feel uncomfortable. Recognizing the existence of this monster, the people determined that it …show more content…
It has been said that blasphemous language is an invaluable tool through which people can express themselves, and I do not entirely disagree. For example: when I’m sitting on the couch and want to change the channel on the TV, but then realize that the remote is one the other side of the room. Or when I pour myself a bowl of cereal, but then realize that there’s no more milk. Or Lord forbid, when I’m flipping through a book and get a paper cut, and I swear on the life of my first born that that piece of paper was laced with liquid cyanide because I know I’m going to die. These situations are no doubt a daunting challenge, but I am able to emerge victorious without reverting to profanity. Another argument people use to justify the existence of profanity is the idea that words cannot hurt you, but I must respectfully disagree. I have in, fact, been hit with a particularly nasty piece of profanity before, and can personally testify that it is quite painful. This particular word slapped me across the face, punched me in the stomach, and kicked out my knee caps before going along its merry way. Profanity does however, have one pro; the ability to make you look unbelievably cool in front of your friends. For humans, the most empowering feeling in the world is knowing that if they mess up in front of …show more content…
Soap in the mouth, perhaps the most well-known (yet ineffective) remedy is both a choking hazard and potentially toxic. What if Ralphie from A Christmas Story actually had gone blind due to soap poisoning?! Another classic; public spankings, were likely to cause the offender to die of embarrassment. And yet, the worst attempt at ending profanity by far was having the guilty party repeat what they had said in front of their ailing grandmother, in which case said grandmother was liable to scream scripture verses at her grandchild as she chased him/her around the house with a wooden
In “Slurring Perspectives,” Elisabeth Camp begins with the argument that slurs are “powerful” and “insidious” precisely because they “present contents from a certain perspective, which is difficult to dislodge despite the fact that it is precisely what a nonbigoted hearer most wants to resist.” It is this reason why slurs are considered more offensive than “pure expressives” like “damn,” because they denote certain negative properties which are meant to contain harmful, “truth-conditionally robust properties” (Camp 330). Camp then goes on to say that slurs “conventionally signal a speaker’s allegiance to a derogating perspective on the group identified by the slur’s extension-determining core” (Camp 331). It is this derogating perspective
However, the bad language used is very mild and infrequent
To answer the question of “Who is the monster?” when talking about “War of the worlds” and “Monsters”, one must understand what a monster is. A monster is not simply a creature so ugly or monstrous it frightens people, it can also be defined as a person or thing who excites horror by wickedness or cruelty. This second definition establishes that we, humans, can be classed as a monster even if we do not fit the stereotypical description of what a monster looks like. This question is an important
The wealthy and affluent members of society controlled language, shaping to keep themselves in a position of power. Language has been used through history to put people down. Slurs created to push people down and create an “us” versus “them” mentality. “Those who control language have the means to set standards for what counts
To begin, words clearly have an impact on humanity. There are dozens of mantras about how people should not let words become poignant; “sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me” (Cupples) being one of the more famous. The very obsession and repetition of such phrases reflects upon
Blasphemy, the act of speaking God’s name sacrilegiously. In Javier Villa-Flores’ book Dangerous Speech: A Social History of Blasphemy in Colonial Mexico he writes about the ways blasphemy is used, prosecution, and how blasphemy was represented in Mexico between the 16th and 17th century. In order to understand the culture and history of Mexico during this time blasphemy cases are used to understand popular piety, and social culture. During the sixteenth and seventeenth century there were many cases of blasphemy. With a collection of all these cases, they can be used in order to better understand the nature of popular piety.
Opponents of Carlin 's legendary act stated that the Supreme Court 's ruling was needed in order to protect social values, despite the “decay of human decency” as George called it. Patrick Trueman, CEO and president of Morality in Media, which is the same group that reported WBAI to the FCC for airing Carlin’s 7 dirty words routine, stated, "The ruling in Pacifica was an important one for people who want to uphold the standard of decency in society. If the FCC was vigilant, you wouldn 't see the networks pushing the envelope, but they do because they aren 't interested in upholding standards of decency and are only interested in making money and competing with cable TV. You get to this point where the FCC has not done its job adequately and
There’s an old saying that “sticks and stones may break your bones, but words will never hurt you.” In reality, that saying is wrong. Words hurt a person as much as punch or a kick can. It may not hurt someone physically, but it can scar someone mentally and emotionally. Due to the topics they are associated with, certain words or phrases can elicit strong reactions; some are positive, while others are negative but nonetheless, they all leave an impact on people.
I enjoy using the occasional curse word when I speak, and I tend to use them frequently when I speak of something that I am passionate about, argue for something, or try to ease frustration. Some may think that swearing is a new, crude, and unintelligent aspect of today’s society. However, the truth behind swearing may come to a surprise. Natalie Angier’s “Almost Before We Spoke, We Swore” reveals some of the science, history and psychology behind why humans swear and where swearing came from.
In some cases' profanity makes the situation worse, and it can make people really angry and upset. In the chapter “The Man I Killed” Azar shares his opinion, “Oh, man, you fuckin’ trashed the fucker, Azar said. You scrambled his sorry self, look at that, you did, you laid him out like shredded fuckin’ Wheat”(O’Brien 119). Azar said these things to O’Brien and it got him upset because he did not want to here about what he had to do to the soldier. Sanders disagrees with his opinion, “Basic psychology, that’s all.
In George Carlin’s Doin’ it Again (1990), Carlin argues that Americans use euphemistic language in an attempt to not face the truth. To support his thesis, Carlin gives an example of how euphemistic language got worse over time, how it makes describing a simple condition harder than it should be, and how certain people use euphemistic language on purpose. Carlin wants others to realize just how bad euphemistic language is in order to never let themselves be victims of it. Carlin’s main audience is basically anyone that will pay attention and listen to him.
Immoral actions, including using profane language in an attempt to degrade or harm others, should be discussed
There is a pair of examples, in fact, which both ably demonstrate a similar scheme of swearing and signifies climactic instants in the thematic struggle with forbidden language. The twin moment of such dangerous but inherently ludicrous comes with the anticipated Stephen-Bloom intersection. If the Citizen is the defender of the faith, Private Carr is the loyal servant of the other of Stephen 's "two masters", "the imperial British state" (U: 24): Private Carr: (Tugging at his belt) I 'll wring the neck of any bugger says a word against my fucking king. (U: 693)
Where as someone of the higher class will have access to more resources and can choose when to use swear word to emphasis a point. Hayes’ article states that cursing is thought to be helpful in expressing strong emotion, in succinctly making a point, and in helping people to bond. Psycholinguists report that some curse words communicate emotion far better than non-curse words. Further, some argue that curse words can be beneficial to those who are trying to communicate a point. Cursing is persuasive!
Language comes naturally, and as time as passed, we have been more inclined to say whatever we want. Unfortunately, recently we have seen more offense being taken to words we say. This is because language can affect people in different ways. In other words, some