The New York Times By Paul Krugman Summary
Krugman, Paul. "Conspiracies, Corruption and Climate." The New York Times. The New York Times, 11 Sept. 2017. Web. 27 Sept. 2017
SOAPSTONE
Speaker: The author of the article is Paul Krugman. Krugman uses sarcasm in his article, and also includes his audience in his article, which is something he seems to value. By asking his audience questions, and using the pronouns "we" and "you". Krugman additionally cites many sources to support his claims, and successfully explains to any unaware audience the background of the situation.
Occasion: The author, Paul Krugman, is very passionate and invested in the issue of climate change. With the new administration in the White House that denies climate change, Krugman writes many articles that stress
…show more content…
Krugman asks questions, then answers them to develop his article, which helps with the pacing and flow of the article. When Krugman explains why they are wrong, he uses scientific data and experiments to back up his opinion, and cites sources to provide concrete evidence.
Tone: Krugman' s tone is cynical and frustrated when he is discussing conservatives determination to "purge climate science and climate scientists wherever it can." and when they flat out deny scientific evidence. His tone shifts when he is talking directly to the audience, which takes on an urgent tone, expressing his concern over the lack of progress of tackling global warming.
New York Times Columnist Paul Krugman writes the op-ed "Conspiracies, Corruption, and Climate" discusses how climate change deniers are incorrect, and that there are many sources that back global warming. Krugman refers to scientific experiments and results, as well as consensuses by climate scientists that help support his claim. Krugman's purpose is to point out that they are wrong in order to try bringing more attention on the issue. Krugman provides background information by explaining his sources and what they mean and the context of it.
"Politicians, Promises, and Getting Real" - Paul Krugman
…show more content…
Krugman is an outspoken author and does not hide or let the audience try and figure out his point, for example at the end he specifically states that "The point is…" to let the audience understand directly what he is trying to say.
Occasion: Krugman writes about a variety of topics, and one of them is politics and economics. With Trump demanding congress to move quickly with his tax reform, Krugman writes the article discussing the flaws and economics of it.
Audience: Krugman's audience is towards everyone. While he is a left leaning columnist, in this article he decides to discuss both sides issues. While he does end up siding with the Democrats plans, he still criticizes them and acknowledges that no matter what someone does with healthcare, there will still be something people will not be content with. Conservatives may agree with some of Krugman's opinions, but on the whole will disagree.
Purpose: Krugman's purpose in writing this is to analyze the Democrats and Republicans healthcare bills, and weigh the pros and cons. He wants the audience to have a better understanding of how each bill would affect them, both positively and negatively. However, in the end he states his point of
Summary Of Why Bother By Michael Pollan
712 Words | 3 PagesPollan effectively establishes credibility and authority as an author on this particular issue, especially given that his audience consists of American people whose lives are affected by global warming and other environmental
John F Kennedy Steel Prices Rhetorical Analysis
661 Words | 3 PagesKennedy uses a concern tone to make the audience trust him; furthermore, John F. Kennedy persuades the audience to act against the steel cost by striving to relate the issue to the audience. In paragraph three, John F. Kennedy starts describing how the increase in the cost of steel will affect all of America. He reminds the audience that it is not only the people who buys steel who are affected, but rather anyone who buys “homes, autos, appliances, and most other items” would also be affected since the cost of those items will increase. Since the audience will also be affected by the increase in steel price, they can relate to the problem; therefore, they will agree with John F. Kennedy and try to find ways to change the increase of steel price. By acknowledging that the increase in steel prices will affect the audience and that the older citizens will not be able to pay for the high prices of steel-based products, John F. Kennedy conveys that he is concerned about the audience.
Analysis Of Zoe Thomas Article On The Federal Reserve
1750 Words | 7 Pagesthey explain the reason behind many Americans hatred or mistrust in the United States Federal Reserve. They go on to explain it through many reasons such as, the former chairman’s tenure compared to chairman Janet Yellen’s tenure, the bailing out of many of American banks, how it is being run at that moment, and the dislike by many American forefathers from the start of it. The article
Delano Roosevelt Rhetorical Analysis Essay
1574 Words | 7 PagesHe laid out the essence of the New Deal’s incoming programs and their benefits and holdbacks, by speaking in simple language, so that any listener could understand. The problem with the country’s spastic reaction to the market crash was that, since many people were uneducated, they misunderstood the economic problems of the time. Their lack of knowledge about the financial situation plummeted the country even lower into the pre-existing hardships of poverty. In the same speech, he assured them, “Your Government does not intend that the history of the past few years shall be repeated. WE do not want and will not have another epidemic of bank failures.”
Matt Ridley's Argument For Global Warming
1289 Words | 6 PagesMatt Ridley and National Geographic have posted articles in attempt to persuade their followers in their opinions of Global warming. Matt Ridley, a man well experienced in almost all forms of fuel, has found a plus to global warming. In his argument Why Climate Change is Good for the World, where he is trying to persuade and educate the people of the world who dislike global warming, he uses very persuasive writing techniques such as placing one of his good arguments first and his best argument last and sandwiching his important but not his best arguments in the middle. He uses popular symbols in his argument to get his audience to relate to his case. Lastly he criticizes the old thought of global warming with valid reason to persuade the audience but also acknowledges that even his argument has flaws by stating the flaws and allowing his audience to disagree.
Michael Pollan Why Bother Analysis
1304 Words | 6 PagesMichael Pollan publishes an inspiring article, "Why Bother?" to The New York Magazine in April 20, 2008. Pollan desires to discusses the problems with society and how climate changed can be impacted. With only a few words in one can tell how passionate Pollan is in illustrating his "why bother?" question.
Film Review Climate Of Doubt
955 Words | 4 PagesAIS4071 Movie Review- Climate of Doubt Name: CHEN Haoyan, Riva SID: 54042113 The documentary Climate of Doubt talked about whether climate change was a scientific truth, it provided many details about the denial of climate change, which I was not familiar with. Although majority of the scientists, precisely, 98% of the climate experts, believe that the major cause of climate change is human activities; there are plenty of people reckon that climate change is a kind of natural phenomenon.
Where Did The Glaciers Go Research Paper
873 Words | 4 PagesScientists theorize that that carbon dioxide, gases, agriculture, technology and human activities are the reason for the sources of the global warming. On the other hand, the non-believers feel that a less than one degree increase over the past 100 years does not merit the global warming term. The constant debates between if the climate change is real or not, makes this a perfect conspiracy theory. In this essay you will encounter different
Summary Of Death Of Horatio Alger By Paul Krugman
520 Words | 3 PagesInitially, Krugman purposely uses an unprofessional tone to describe Business Week, a source referenced frequently throughout the essay. For example, he refers to Business Week as a “leftist rag” and as “commies” who repeatedly classify America as a minimal class advancement society (133). Despite Krugman agreeing with Business Week in most economic matters, he clearly aims to gain the reader’s attention by shock value through the use of a condescending tone, which not only is offensive to his
Rhetorical Devices In Kennedy's Speech
761 Words | 4 PagesHowever, in parts of his speech Kennedy talks about how certain groups in the nation are working to help the people of America. For example in line 92 Kennedy talks about the Department of Defense. He talks about what they’re doing to figure out why the prices of steel are rising so quickly and what needs to be done to protect the public interest. By using positive and negative words Kennedy is able to make his opinion clear. The audience is able to see Kennedy’s negative opinion on the rising steel prices and his positive opinion on what different organizations are doing to help with the current steel crisis.
The Economic Catastrophe In Henry M. Paulson's On The Brink
951 Words | 4 PagesPreceding his part in the Department of the Treasury, Paulson was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs along with the Secretary of the Treasury. “I’ve watched the economy flounder and the mood of our citizens darken as they struggled with unpaid debts, foreclosure jokes, ravaged nest eggs, lost jobs, and lost confidence in themselves and in our system (XIV Paulson).” In other words, paulson
Persuasive Essay On Climate Change
1776 Words | 8 PagesIn the final 2016 presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, climate change received a mere two seconds worth of airtime. Surprisingly, Clinton’s brief recognition of the issue represents a substantial improvement from the 2012 campaigns, an election in which climate change was never formally mentioned during a live, national debate (Zeller Jr. and Zelman). Based on this synopsis, one might conclude that neither politicians nor the general public is at all concerned with global warming; however, this deduction couldn’t be more fallacious. In fact, the majority of Americans “overwhelmingly believe” that global warming is a major issue, and that “carbon emissions should be scaled back” (Popovich et. al). The unfortunate reality
Comparing Two Articles On Global Climate Change
793 Words | 4 PagesThe author is invested in being right about climate change not being a concern, likely due to political
Genre: A Comparative Analysis
565 Words | 3 PagesWachter depicts the impact of global food price shocks on domestic inflation in a large group of countries, the political science article Mobilizing the Public Against the President: Congress and the Political Costs of Unilateral Action which was published by the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) in 2015 by Dino P. Christenson and Douglas L. Kriner B deliniates a series of experiments that demonstrate Congress’s ability to erode support for unilateral actions by raising both constitutional and policy-based objections to the exercise of unilateral power. In this paper I’ll be presenting the ways in which the writing styles of these two subgenres within the social sciences are alike, and how they are dissimilar. Generally speaking, the economic and political science realms are uniform in the fact that they both have similar formatting, layout, organization, visual elements/setup. For starters,
Global Warming Isn T Real Essay
657 Words | 3 PagesPeople every day state that global warming isn’t real and that the climate is fine, when it is clearly not. Many believe that climate change isn’t real and that the believers are using fake science to support it. In the article titled, “Climate change science implodes as IPCC climate models found to be “totally wrong” … temperatures aren’t rising as predicted…hoax unraveling” author, Mike Adams states, “The paper, a confession authored by climate change alarmists Myles R. Allen, Richard J. Millar, and others, reveals that global warming climate models are flat wrong, having been biased and crafted towards “worst case” warming predictions that were designed to alarm and scare the general public”. The researchers also said that carbon dioxide
More about The New York Times By Paul Krugman Summary
Summary Of Why Bother By Michael Pollan
712 Words | 3 PagesJohn F Kennedy Steel Prices Rhetorical Analysis
661 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Zoe Thomas Article On The Federal Reserve
1750 Words | 7 PagesDelano Roosevelt Rhetorical Analysis Essay
1574 Words | 7 PagesMatt Ridley's Argument For Global Warming
1289 Words | 6 PagesMichael Pollan Why Bother Analysis
1304 Words | 6 PagesFilm Review Climate Of Doubt
955 Words | 4 PagesWhere Did The Glaciers Go Research Paper
873 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Death Of Horatio Alger By Paul Krugman
520 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Devices In Kennedy's Speech
761 Words | 4 PagesThe Economic Catastrophe In Henry M. Paulson's On The Brink
951 Words | 4 PagesPersuasive Essay On Climate Change
1776 Words | 8 PagesComparing Two Articles On Global Climate Change
793 Words | 4 PagesGenre: A Comparative Analysis
565 Words | 3 PagesGlobal Warming Isn T Real Essay
657 Words | 3 Pages