Organic Food Organically grown food tastes better, it’s safer, and it’s healthier for you. The major benefit of organic farming is the reduction of pollution. People who eat organic food eat it, not only, because they enjoy it but also because of the benefits it has. In the book, Young Readers Edition: The Omnivore's Dilemma: The Secrets behind What You Eat, Pollan explains that Industrial Organic is food grown on large industrial size farms with all natural pesticides and no chemicals. It is sold in large supermarket chains, and one of the most common is Whole Foods. In 2006, 77 percent of UK (households) bought organic food. ven though organic food may be a tad more expensive, more people should eat organic food because it tastes better, …show more content…
People who eat food that is not organically grown are eating food that has either been processed or that has been grown with chemicals that could kill them. Industrial organic has changed over the years. For example, they now have organic tv dinners, but as Gene Kahn explained to Pollan, "behind every organic TV dinner or chicken stand acres of land that will no longer be doused with chemicals." (Chevat, 120) Just because they have tv dinners doesn’t mean that they are fake organic. If it is grown without chemicals it is organic. It is good that they found a way to make organic high fructose corn syrup. People who eat organic food eat it because they trust it and they know that is good for them. People have there reasons to trust organic food one of which is, “because it does not contain pesticide residues, GM ingredients or artificial additives, and because it contains more nutrients and vitamins than non-organic food.” (Melchett) Peter is saying that people trust organic food because it doesn’t have chemicals and it is all natural. There are some people who can’t afford to buy things that are grown organically. With all the work it takes to keep it chemical free and meet the demand it costs more, "Polyface Farm's eggs at $2.20 a dozen might be a better deal than supermarket eggs at $0.79 a dozen." (Chevat, 199) with all the work it takes to make the price is reasonable, but that doesn’t mean people can afford it. That is how organic food is safer and healthier than industrial
Thread 1: In The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Pollan describes what the omnivore’s dilemma actually is. He begins his book as a naturalist in a supermarket trying to decide “what to eat?”. This question is harder to answer without asking where the food originates. Knowing where food comes from is very difficult, unless it is locally grown or clearly states it on the package. Processed food is more complicated to understand where it comes from.
In the corn section of The Omnivore's Dilemma the author, Michael Pollan, goes on a journey to follow the industrial food chain and on his journey he finds out that corn is in nearly everything we eat. Since it is fed to cows, salmon and other animal corn ends up in places we would not think of like hamburgers, milk and soda. In one of the chapters Pollan tells the readers that for every bushel of corn it cost one dollar more to produce it than to buy it. The abundance of corn has caused the price to go down, however farmers are still producing corn due to government subsidies, even though they necessarily won’t make a profit off of it. This in turn keeps farmers in business but not out of debt.
In the article ¨The Omnivore 's Delusion: Against the Agri-Intellectuals,¨ by Blake Hurst, he rebukes agri-intellectuals, which is a person who criticizes industrial farming without having personal experience in the agriculture field, by illustrating the logic and rationale to industrial farming methods. One of the most significant ideas Hurst argues against is the misunderstanding of modern day farming. ¨On the other were the kind of wooden pens that our critics would have us use, where the sow could turn around, lie down.. killing several piglets¨(Hurst 6). Industrial farmers use creates that prevent the mother pig from standing after her piglets are born. Although, critics might see this is cruel, it is actually keep mother from laying
Teshaeva Shakhlo 17 of May 2018 English 101 A Richard Cartwright Paper 3 The book "Omnivore's Dilemma" is one of the most important books about food industry politics in the past fifty years. The author of the book Michael Pollan doing his report for New York Times magazine decided to research from where is his food comes from. He started following the food back to the source to clarify his doubts. Basically Omnivore's dilemma describes the food in America describing three main food chains like corn, grass and the forest.
Despite the increase in organic buyers, the majority of people do not know how to merely interpret what the word organic even entails. The United States Department of Agriculture enforces and regulates the labeling of organic products, namely food products (cornucopia.org). In addition to the elusiveness of organic foods, organics are apt to be more expensive than conventional food; this is because instead of a huge manufacturing plant, one would be receiving their food products from a small farm (where a small amount of food is being grown and harvested). People choose to argue that organic food is far better for you than conventional or natural food; however, there are only minute differences between the two. Stephanie Watson, an executive editor of Harvard’s Women Health Watch, states:“The researchers discovered very little difference in nutritional content, aside from slightly higher phosphorous levels in many organic foods, and a higher omega-3 fatty acid content in organic milk and chicken” (Harvard.edu).
In the book The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Pollan shows us his view about the corn. Corn is a crop, which is highly using today, and there are many products including the ingredients of corn. However, Pollan’s point is trying to help people to notice what they are eating. In the views of economic, corn is an essential factor, which has reshaped American culture, and it turns people into an industrial eaters.
Organic is always associated with chemical-free production. However, does the word “Organic” on a label mean the product is indeed organic? Eliot Coleman in his article, “Beyond Organic”, published in December/January 2002 in the “Mother Earth News” magazine, claims that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has become a threat to the organic farmers. Coleman starts to grab readers’ attention with his personal experience, providing strong facts about organic food, and applying some emotional appeals; however, his audience is only convincing for organic farmers but not strong enough to convince the ordinary organic consumers.
In Alex Garcia essay Why Organic Foods Are Worth the Cost she discuses why organic foods are actually worth the cost. In Garcia opening statement she beings by saying “Despite all the confusion, current research shows that the health and environmental benefits of organic foods outweighed their extra cost (Garcia 112).” Garcia main goal is to show her audience why organic foods are the better chose and why in the end they are worth the extra cost. She begins explaining to the readers the process of how organic foods are made.
As we go through The Jungle, Omnivore’s Dilemma, and Food, Inc., it becomes apparent that all of these publishings target ethos to appeal to their audience. Upton Sinclair uses ethos during the time when he describes workers washing their hands in the water used for the sausage (Sinclair 143). This is bias because it compels the reader into acknowledging that the things going into food is not right, however it does not show any good qualities in the meatpacking industry. Therefore, this affects the reader’s value system because when they were informed of the monstrosities going on within the food industries, it changes their trust towards the industry. Another example of this is Michael Pollan’s bias __ the food industry when he states that
First of all, Pollan states just because it says it's organic doesn't mean it really is. If you buy an “organic” salad at your local grocery store, farmers will still use pesticides to keep bugs away and other animals. The chemicals they use are all natural, but it's not truly organic if you use pesticides or other chemicals. In The Omnivore’s Dilemma Pollan says, “Instead of toxic pesticides, crops are sprayed with natural substances, like BT, a pesticide made from a common soil bacteria” (140.) This quote proves that big organic industrial companies use pesticides to help produce grow.
Local sustainable is one of the four food chains Michael Pollan talks about in his book The Omnivore’s Dilemma. The local sustainable food is grown on small farms. Food from farms like these don’t travel long distances like they would in the industrial or industrial organic food chain. These farms also have diverse crops and animals. Local sustainable is the best food chain to feed all of the people in the United States because it doesn’t harm the environment, animals aren’t mistreated, and crops are naturally raised.
Many people choose to eat only organic because it’s said to be healthier but when compared to non-organic food the difference is slim. Regardless people continue to buy organic products. People get emotionally connected to
Organic Food In the society where people are getting more concerned about one 's health organic food has become a widely spread and followed by many people tendency. Organic food is believed to have better impact on person 's well-being and not to cause harm to people and the surrounding world due to its ecological nature. The debate that has been recently developed around this topic cannot be solved easily since both supporters and their counterparts provide reasonable arguments supporting their positions. However, to get into the problem and find the answer to a question that concerns many people it is necessary to identify organic food at first.
Many people wonder what the actual difference between organic and conventional food is, if there is a difference between them at all. Organically grown and raised food are foods that have not been fertilized or have not had antibiotics put into the animal producing the food. Although many people assume organic food is healthier because of the over raised price, studies have shown that organic food has, in most cases, little to no differences with the conventional food in supermarkets. In passage 1, the author, Rachel Cernansky discusses both sides of the dispute and gives contrasting details from both sides.
You can decrease it it but not stop it. In my opinion i don’t like organic foods because the only thing. I see i unnecessary things. We may not agree but i don’t like organic foods. People have survived long enough.