“The orchestration of the Gulf war was a glaring expression of what the situationists call the spectacle — the development of modern society to the point where images dominate life” -Ken Knabb. The Gulf war began on August 2, 1990 after Iraq invaded Kuwait and bombed Kuwait’s capital, Kuwait City, to stop them from over-producing oil. Middle Eastern countries got power from the West, including the United States, to intervene with Iraq’s invasion. The United Nations passed a proposition that if by January 15, 1991 Iraq still hadn’t surrendered, other forces could intervene. On January 12, 1991, congress allowed President George H.W Bush the ability to wage war. By January 17, 1991 America began an air assault to disable Iraq’s communications …show more content…
An anonymous freelance researcher showed that even separate major media networks had different death tolls. (Smith OPERATION CENSORED WAR) FOX news, a predominantly right wing network, the same as then President George H.W Bush, showed only one Iraqi soldier being run over by a tank. (Smith) FOX’s censorship was likely done to keep republicans oblivious to the hundreds of civilian death during the war, and to keep them in support of Operation Desert Storm. On the other hand, the Cable News Network, CNN, opted not to censor the “Mile of Death” in which the total death count is unsure, but a confirmed 350 Iraqians perished. (Smith) Seeing as CNN’s personal views were far off from then President George H.W Bush, media networks were doing whatever the wanted to support their personal view. This shows that major media networks such as FOX and CNN would censor anything that happened that didn’t agree with their personal views. Examples such as this were the reason why the American public were too misinformed during the Gulf War. Another example of censorship during the Gulf War came from a reporter for NBC who was in Iraq and Kuwait reporting overseas for the channel. When he resigned from NBC years after he reported the Gulf War, he came forward to say “Reporters in the Gulf were …show more content…
The Government used major media networks, such as CNN and Fox, to gather support for the war by tactics of manipulation and censorship. Furthermore, a Justice Department investigation into possible bribery and fraud, which could equal or exceed the teapot dome scandal, has been left inconclusive, and was the top censored story of 1991. (Gulf War issues top censored news list) Although this information was censored, and the majority of the public did not know this, it has caused a massive distrust in media. Over the years, more and more people have come to realize that the media puppets what the government claims, getting public support for most everything that the government wants to do. “ The Gulf War, is a carefully managed effort in controlling and managing the news.” -Jeff
While there are always two sides to a story, both sides are not always told. CNN and FOX news are both at fault for this. CNN and FOX news exhibit bias by omission in their coverage of the Trayvon Martin case (Types). Both news groups neglected to cover both the liberal and conservative side. CNN took the stance that Trayvon was just a child, and Zimmerman was a criminal that attacked him.
The hero (the U.S. and any allies) confronts a dangerous, evil and irrational villain and must defeat him, liberating his oppressed people” (Harmon and Muenchen 2). This spin was of course picked up by sources traditionally on better terms with conservatives (Fox News being the most notable). This was not an isolated incident. Running for reelection in 2004, Bush campaign officials orchestrated or at least reiterated false allegations made against Senator Kerry and his war record carefully to let the press loose with their narrative
The people of America were watching through the media to gain an understanding of this situation. In these stories humanity is seen to
During the integration of Little Rock Nine central high school in 1957, the media illuminated certain events but painted and inaccurate picture of other events. In many cases not just the ones during that time the media has illuminated lots of things like the Trayvon Martin case where as thought they told us everything. During the time things were so bad back then. Also it was dangerous for the kids to go to the school by there self so the president sent in the military.
This gradual transformation started in the early 1980’s when President Reagan was in office. A process began where media outlets were owned and controlled under five mega corporations. Television news was and still is seen as sucessful business for profit. To maintain profit, news outlets depend on drama for ratings. Once the The Fairness Doctrine of was eliminated in 1987, conservative outrage news segments dominated.
Ironically, Rupert Murdoch, the head of Fox News’ parent company, has been quoted saying, "I challenge anybody to show me an example of bias in Fox News Channel." (Murdoch) Bias is clearly evident in much of the coverage from Fox News, however in this case the data is on their side, and they have presented a grand argument for the SCCC organization’s
On March 20, 2003, one of the most controversial decisions in modern American history was made. George W. Bush sent American troops to invade Iraq in an attempt to remove dictator Saddam Hussein from power. Along with overthrowing Hussein, America would restructure the Iraqi government to align with both democratic principles and American ideologies. Bush justified the actions of his campaign by accusing Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction as well as being a threat to global security.
When the public is informed about the shortcomings of war, rarely are they shown lavishly graphic imagery, unless one has personally sought it out. This probable notion of censorship is the issue raised by Torie Rose Deghett in the article “The War Photo No One Would Publish”. Deghett introduces the reader to a potentially unfamiliar and graphic image taken during the Gulf War by photographer Kenneth Jarecke. The mere description of this image is distressing and leads to Deghett’s main argument, where she questions if broadcasting images of this nature are necessary in order to keep the public informed. Throughout the piece, Daghett appears mainly in favor of allowing these images to be present in the media, throughout describing how the
In DeGhett’s essay, The War Photo No One Would Publish, DeGhett constructs an argument around the censorship of wartime media. DeGhett does so by illustrating an image of the horrifying consequences of war specifically in the Gulf War through a chilling photo of a burned Iranian solider. The argument evolves from the possible impact of a single photo to the moral problems of over censorship in media. This argument is in opposition to the argument that censorship is for the protection of the audience. Instead DeGhett’s essay makes the overall argument that the truth of war was being hidden from the American people.
“Announcing War Against Iraq” Have you ever heard a speech that has affected you or made an impact upon your life? Well, the speech on “Announcing War Against Iraq” by President George H.W. Bush affected the lives of millions of Americans. This speech was given on January 16, 1991 and uses three motives of influencing Americans on the war against Iraq. This speech is remarkable because it influenced many people. It is highly regarded today because it announced a war upon Iraq.
Americans were shaken and scared, so once the mention of weapons of mass destruction we took action because we did not want to take a chance of another horrid event happening in the US. President George w Bush attempted to reconcile with the dictator of Iraq without any success From Saddam Hussein This began to raise flags about the weapons. If they were not present, then why wouldn 't the dictator want to meet and try to resolve any issues with one of the biggest military forces in the world besides Russia. So George w Bush sprung into action march 20 2003 Launching the beginning of the Iraq war. Every since the beginning of the war with Iraq it has cost the united states tremendous amounts of money.
In America, Media bias is everywhere, in the United States all the information that an average American received through everyday sources, the news was most likely processed through the media and told through a biased point of view, when the media gets their hands on news if it is important then it probably won’t be talked about or downplayed no matter the source like in the newspaper, radio, television, movies, as well as other outlets that the media uses, the media only seems to share the news that they find interesting, even then the media would most likely have changed the story, in what they say is just tweaked news, what actually happened and what really happened would be two different stories, also the story would be told from one person
When thinking of the media you think they are reporting the appropriate and accurate information not based on any personal opinions and feelings. Also one would not think the media would be reporting based on one side of politics or the other. The media is extremely biased when it comes to politics and news. While some of the media is conservative-biased I believe the mass media is liberal-biased. Majority of media outlets are liberal companies, media personnel and journalists will identify themselves as democrats and liberals more so than republicans or conservatives and lastly the left side (liberals) of the mass media is persuasive on what information to report.
If the media would report information as it happens with factual information, American would be left to interpret the data how they see fit. The Americans ' background and socialization will allow the information to be digested and interpreted in specific way. The media needs to be a platform to share information on a specific topic accurately, not a place to advance one 's
Speech by official (American or Iraqi) or prominent citizen 12 = First Gulf war / History 4 = Domestic politics 13 = Protests / Rallies 5 =