In the short story “The Overcoat”, and in the book The Namesake several comparisons are made. The main characters in both the book The Namesake and in “The Overcoat” are facing two different challenges, but both have to find out how to overcome them or struggle to the very end of their life. Akaky Akakievich in “The Overcoat”, is contemplating the struggle of having to get a new coat made, and losing his new coat after the tailor has just made it. He was so grateful to have his new coat and then after he has become comfortable with it he loses it when he gets jumped on the street, after walking home from a colleague’s party. Gogol in The Namesake, is faced with the death of his father and trying to please a lady (so she will become his
One similarity is the situation these two narrators are put through.
Both of the circumstances feature a father and a son who experience life in a Holocaust concentration camp. Even though both situations are similar, the perspective
In the later part of the text, Anderson incorporates similes and metaphors to compare the
Both characters in these texts have situations that are weighing on them heavily. Both texts also use the rhetorical appeal of pathos to envoke emotion and sympathy from the readers. Examples of this include, "Mama, a job? I open and close car doors all day long. I drive a man around in his limousine and I say, "Yes, sir; no, sir; very good, sir; shall I take the Drive, sir?
Thought these stories are somewhat similar, their differences greatly outweigh them, causing the feelings of the viewer to be completely different. The development of the character’s perspective, the provisions received from God, and the theme of family ties beating the despair in times of trouble are all but a few of the differences that separate these two
In both stories the Protagonist are scared out of their minds, but they fight to survive, even though they are scared of dying. “I’m not trying to be a hero! If you think I’m like this, your crazy! Amy, look.
These two stories may resemble each other in some ways, but their themes are as far apart as can be. Not only are they bringing across different messages, but the way they choose to deliver those messages are unique and diverse. " Even so, I rather think they understand one thing-fear. The fear of pain and the fear of death"(Connell 3). Richard Connell does an exceptional job with incorporating the theme into his writing, and by this citation, he reveals to us the moral of The Most Dangerous Game; you must have empathy for all living creatures.
Could there be contrasts and likenesses between two accounts composed by two unique individuals? Confronting various types of afflictions? It is conceivable to discover contrasts and likenesses in two stories relating two various types of occasions? Imprisonment accounts were main stream with pursuers in both America and the European continents. Bondage stories of Americans relate the encounters of whites subjugated by Native Americans and Africans oppressed by early American settlers.
Their use of compare and contrast lets them effectively explain the difference between their experiences and those around them. Using these modes of rhetoric both writers are able to communicate a common theme of being or fearful of what the future holds for them. The fact that there is a common theme between these two essays shows that messages can transcend time, works of literature and experiences. Narration is most commonly used to tell a story. Both writers use narration to tell their stories and by doing so make them more personal.
Characters and Conflict Both stories share characters and conflicts that are alike in many ways and different in few. For instance, in “The Cask of Amontillado,” there is a man by the name of Montresor, whose pride has been injured. In “Hop-Frog,” there too is
In the story known as “Charles,” there are two main protagonists, Charles and Laurie. But what if foreshadowing convinces us that Charles and Laurie aren’t two separate people, but are one and the same. An example of foreshadowing occurs when Laurie’s mom states that Laurie had to think before he told his mom about his first day of kindergarten. Laurie's mom also states that “Laurie though.’ It was Charles…” (11).
One big similarity is foreshadowing. This took place in both articles, for, “Charles,” an example of foreshadowing is when he had to think who misbehaved and said than finally said, “Charles.” An example of foreshadowing in, “The Lottery,” is when Old Man Warner says, “ Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.” This can indicate that the people of the village are sacrificing a human, which they are.
Both of these stories use the theme of isolation, madness, symbolism and have an ironic ending.
In the final paragraph of "The Overcoat", the ghost that has been stealing overcoats from people is confronted by a watchman, and he seemed to be purposely confusing. One may view it as the ghost of poor Akaky, that is now haunting the unjust society that allows the victimization and bullying of the weak and the poor by the higher class that is strong and mighty. The way the ghost is described in this paragraph is " this apparition, however, was considerably taller and adorned with immense mustaches, and directing its steps apparently toward Obukhov Bridge, vanished into the darkness of the night" (Gogol, pp782). The apparition wore huge mustaches, was a symbol of the people that took Akaky overcoat in the first place, and this suggests that
Until this point, the two stories are similar and advance more of the same theme. The following paper thus seeks to analyze the