Holocaust Survivor Elie Wiesel delivered a powerful speech titled “The Perils of Indifference” in which he expressed his disapproval of those who chose to ignore the suffering of others. he uses personal stories, historical truth, and a call to action, as well as ethos, logos, pathos, and repetition. Elie highlighted the fact that indifference can be more harmful than any other emotion or feeling of humans. his speech was a strong reminder of the consequences of our indifference and a call to action to make a difference in the world. Eli uses ethos in his speech when he constantly says “us” and “we” because it originated from his personal experience and others' experiences. His speech addresses “Mr. President, Ms. Clinton, the congress, Ambassador
Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference” uses pathos, loaded words, and rhetorical questions to persuade his audience that one must act when they see injustice, suffering, or unfair treatment. The use of pathos in “The Perils of Indifference” persuades the audience that one must act when they see injustice. “He was finally free, but there
Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.
1. Describe the type of speech--informative, persuasive, celebratory. Why? I would say overall this speech was celebratory with persuasive tones throughout. This speech was made to commemorate and celebrate the accomplishments of what has been done so far in the United States, while urging for action from each party and member of states in order to make a better America.
Samuel Boren Block English II Honors 21 April 2023 An Analysis of “The Perils of Indifference” History scholars often ask how a tragedy as egregious as the Holocaust could have possibly happened. Why didn’t anyone stand up for Jewish people? In his speech, Eliezer Wiesel, a survivor of the Holocaust, argues it was due to indifference. He aims to raise awareness by speaking out about this dangerous mentality.
Wiesel emphasizes the problem of apathy using pathos and ethos to make his case. Elie Wiesel achieves this in a number of ways by putting the audience and himself on an equal footing, and because of his earlier success, he has credibility even before he starts talking about the idea of indifference. Elie Wiesel urges his audience to take action to fight the indifference in society and between nations. This speech attempts to educate listeners on the speaker's viewpoint on indifference and how societies respond to disasters.audience in his shoes and the shoes of others who have suffered as a result of indifference. Elie Wiesel's life has been marred by tragedy.
Rhetoric is an important analytical tool in comprehending the message of a text while conducting research. Recent research on learning styles has turned out a wide range of facts, figures, and statistics. By studying rhetoric, a researcher can better identify unbiased sources. Over the past several decades, awareness of the three learning styles has grown significantly. As a result, many educators have endeavored to spread understanding of the importance of learning styles in the classroom.
In “the perils of indifference” Elie Wiesel gives a message of hope while condemning the past, and persuading the audience by using the emotional language, etho, rhetorical questioning, and compare and contrast to incite change. Elie starts his speech by bring the audience attention
A Time to Kill is a remembered experience that brings up the question, “Is a father justified to kill the young men who raped his daughter?” There are many fallacies used throughout this trial, such as, Appeals to Trial, Ad Hominem, Authoritative Warrant, Hasty Generalization, Claim of Fact and many others. The trial also used Ethos, Pathos and Logos to get its point across. If there were no fallacies, ethos, pathos or logos used, then the trial wouldn’t have been as strong as it was illustrated to be in the movie.
Part 1: Find the exercise on pgs. 158-159/109-112 For Writing and Discussion and respond to questions 1-4 about the two passages. 1. How do the strategies of persuasion differ in these two passages?
Introductory Paragraph Bernie Sanders' presence was very calm but aggressive and it helped him get his point across during the speech. Bernie in the speech addresses right for different individuals, poverty, and events happening right now that require everyone's attention. Bernie Sanders' speech was effective and informative because of the connection he made with most of the audience, his morals, and the knowledge he has on the topic spoken about. Body Paragraph 1 (Connection w/ audience) From the beginning of the speech, he connected with most audience members which benefited him throughout the speech.
Nobel Peace Prize-Winning Author, Elie Wiesel, in his sympathetic speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” warns people about the dangers of indifference. He supports his claim by describing a scenario with a young Jewish boy and him being saved by American soldiers from a concentration camp. Wiesel also supports his claim by telling a story about how indifference is worse than anger and hatred through descriptive words. He finally uses imagery to give us a descriptive image of what indifference could do for the future. Wiesel’s purpose is to warn people of the danger of indifference in order to inform people of all the harm indifference can because.
Thinking about what truly brings you happiness, what can you think of ? Do you think of the old shirt in the back of your closet that you haven’t worn in years, maybe it's time to get rid of it. In the TED talk” Less stuff, more happiness" presented by Graham Hill in October of 2011 he informs the audience about rethinking if you need everything in your life. He gives this speech to the TED audience in hopes to make a difference in their lives.
In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of
In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.
According to Elie Wiesel, our sorrow and suffering are little in compared to the apathy with which we have not responded. The fact that we choose to ignore other people's pain shows that the problem of indifference will never be overcome. As a child, Wiesel observed horrific injustices that inspired him to not only teach people about indifference, but also to show them the risks of indifference's anguish and despair. “Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred.(Wiesel)”This comment also helps him comprehend apathy since he utilizes words like "hate" to make his audience feel wounded in some way because no one appreciates being a target. Wiesel used rhetorical questions and references to make his point relatable to every individual in his audience, making his address clear, dependable, and, most importantly, pleasant by putting the audience in his shoes and the shoes of those who have suffered as a result of apathy.