School searches are a highly debated topic among schools. Searches are used to maintain safety. There is a lot of backgroung that goes into searches and although they arent meant to protect students and school, there are many people who oppose it but also some who support. There are many laws and personal rights that schools have to follow in order to conduct a school search. The U.S. Consitution protects peoples ' privacy. Reasonable suspicion is a standard for student searching. A search must be justified and reasonable grounds and also related in scope to the circumstances that justified the search (Ehlenberger). Even though schools dimish our 4th Amendment rights , the Court made a standard that help our rights within the school system. …show more content…
Although drug education is taught in school, it seems like the message just isn 't getting through. The National Institute on Drug Abuse reported an annual study that showed “more than half of all students have tried drugs at least once by the time they were in 12th grade” (Robinson). This indicated that even though the consequences are taught in school, students still take the risk. Secondly, school searches keep us from wanting to bring those incriminating things on school grounds. They are thought to “deter those who would think of bringing drugs or firearms on the campus” (Robinson). Through common sense you can see how students wouldn’t bring drugs onto school grounds because they would run the risk of getting caught and in serious trouble. Lastly, using drug dogs in drug searches casts a sense of security for parents and also students. as stated in the article, "I may not be able to control what students do off school property, but i do not want parents or students to fear that they will be in class with other studenst who are under the influence" (Robinson). This shows how drug searches/ dogs can minimize parents and students worry about if they 're in a safe school. In conclusion, I believe drug searches are very productive and important in school systems to keep everyone
However, mere suspicion does not permit law enforcement officers to stop, question or frisk an individual. But, the officer can continue observing the suspected individual(s) to see if any higher level of suspicion develops. Reasonable suspicion is the lowest standard of proof. It is a conclusion that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime. According to Terry v. Ohio, Reasonable suspicion grants permission to an officer to conduct a stop, question and possibly frisk.
Some may argue that teachers have the right to search students if they have a reasonable cause as stated in the amendment but probable cause is subjective and the burden falls upon the student to prove that it is not unreasonable. A study showed that the success of a student proving unreasonableness is highly unlikely because of the systems in place that oppress students according to Expelling Hope, a book written by Christopher G. Robbins. The fact that it is up to the student proves that it is in the students disadvantage and that there is a problem that needs to be
Historically speaking, student searches came about in response to schools such as Columbine, Jonesboro, West Paducah, Pearl, Littleton, and Springfield 's sudden acts of violence at these schools. Schools and communities use these methods typically use the best search policies are developed by school boards who work collaboratively with local law enforcement officials, local judges, attorneys, school staff, community members to keep the school safe and maintaining the survival of the school. In the article by Kate R. Ehlenberger, Assistant Executive Director, Commonwealth Educational policy institute
An officer may only be allowed to search a person 's personal belongings if their reasoning is associated with a lawful arrest and if they have a probable cause to search (Matthews). After it being a huge deal in New York, other cities and states began embracing the use of stop-and-frisk as it began growing around the United States. In the 1950s police officials in other cities took up, and expanded, the stop-and-search tactics by using the LAPD to embrace the theory of crime
The topic is if schools should ban books, well I kind of get why teachers and professors would want to get rid of books but think about the students you're taking away good books from them. Sure there might be things that might not be as suitable for the kids, but sometimes they're going to have to run into bad things in the books. I ran into a book and my mom didn't want me to read it, I didn't, so basically what i'm trying to say is their parents should handle what they read. The books should have labels that tell you the level it is and what the book is about on the back.
(The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated-Staros). Students have many rights; but, it is the right of the school to search students when there is reasonable suspicion of a threat. An example of this is the court case TLO v New Jersey. " T.L.O. was a high school student. School officials searched her purse suspecting she had cigarettes.
If you don't know what the 4th Amendment is, it guards against unreasonable searches and seizures. If students are tested for drugs they may get discouraged about life and want to commit suicide, or they might not try as hard in their school work. Student athletes should not be tested for drugs because it takes money out of their education. Student athletes should not be tested for drugs because it takes money out of their education. They should not test them because it costs so much for a test and to test a couple hundred student athletes.
Staying away from drugs is just the best way, and getting drug tested is only going to help student athletes. I believe that school officials should start testing more
“Over 60% of teens claim drugs are used on school grounds”(Fitzgerald). Over the years, schools have not been doing anything to prevent this. Teens revealed that, “1 in 5 of their classmates either drink, use drugs, or smoke during school hours on school grounds” (Fitzgerald). More studies show that, “17% of high school students use drugs daily.” Kids in schools know someone who either does drugs, or sells drugs on school grounds (“School”).
“No Homework For Students” Imagine being able to go home and not have to worry about doing homework or a big project to present. There wouldn’t be any stress about school. Instead, you get to lay down and watch your favorite show. Then you could go to the park with your friends and play games, or do anything that interests you.
If they drug test them, they can prevent safety issues, show that they care about their students, and prevent unfair situations. Drug testing should be done in schools because it keeps the athletes safe, it prevents unfair situations, and teaches life lessons. Drug testing keeping student athletes keeps students safe, because it shows that the school cares about them, and if they care about sports, they should be ready for a drug test. Studies on performance enhancers, like steroids, etc., show that after a while of using the drug, negative effects on long term health come into play (Pro & Con…). Keeping kids healthy and safe is one of the school 's main priorities and they will do what it takes to keep kids safe.
Particularly in light of the possibility that a positive drug test result may not be accurate because it could be a false positive result. The article, JUST SAY NO TO RANDOM DRUG TESTING: A GUIDE FOR STUDENTS states, “If schools are serious about keeping their students from abusing drugs, then they should listen to the experts – to the National Education Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry – who all say that one of the best ways to keep kids off drugs is to get them involved in school and extracurricular activities.” (ACLU.org). This detail shows drug testing in schools isn't even effective and the interpretation of the drug tests may lead to false-positive findings so it isn't always correct.
First of all, drug testing students is a violation of their privacy rights. The fourth amendment protects students from unreasonable searches and seizures. Drug testing without a probable cause is a clear violation of this right. Even if there was a probable cause, drug testing can be seen as an invasion of privacy. Students shouldn’t take a drug test unless someone has clearly seen them using or have anything in possession.
Everyone goes to school, everyone has homework. Homework has been a topic of interest for a very long time. Many students think that homework is not beneficial. However, without homework people wouldn’t remember what they learned in class. Homework gives kids the chance to prove what they have learned.
Disabled kids in regular school classrooms Disabled kids in a regular school classroom. What could go wrong? According to plenty of surveys, disabled kids are shown to perform better academically and socially. In today’s society, we are seeing more and more disabled kids being put into classrooms with non-disabled kids. But is this as beneficiary as we believe?