The Pillow Angel otherwise knows as a little girl name Ashley who is disabled. Ashley is brain damaged so in fear of her getting out of hand when she gets bigger, the parents of Ashley decided to have her dosed with high amounts of estrogen. The purpose of the treatment is to keep her small, so she is easier to take care of. Just over two years of this treatment Ashley’s growth plates were closed and her height was reduced by 13 inches. The parents say the goal was “ to improve our daughters quality of life and not to convenience her caregivers.” The treatments didn’t stop there, they removed her uterus to decrease any pain she may have eventually had, and also removed her breast tissue. The risk of this treatment is blood clots or thrombosis. There are few cases, but the risk are …show more content…
It is right because it is not a danger to her health and they have a list of benefits that are rational. It is also legal so they are not breaking any laws. I find it just wrong, as well, because it is kinda just benefiting the caregivers of the child more. They are literally altering her just because they think she will be a struggle to deal with her. I just think I would have gone with another alternative to benefit Ashley. The “ Ashley Case” in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine is very extraordinary, it is a true challenge in modern medicine. With the question, is it ethical? I found it bizarre, yet I understood where they were coming from. I believe that I myself would probably have a hard decision to make if I was in the parents shoes. I particularly think this case is just a medical dilemma. Which I would expect it was a tough time for both Ashley and her parents. My true opinion on this case is undecided. This truly troubling to make such a decision on which side am I on. I really enjoyed reading about this child, her case is just so fascinating. I’m really glad I chose this topic for my
"I just told them they could do a topsy. Nothing else, Them doctors never said nuthin about keeping her alive in no tubes or growin no cells. All they told
Around the time that she was coming into hospital Dr Howard W. Jones and his boss Richard Wesley TeLinde has been debating what they could classify as cervical cancer and what was the best method to treat it. Richard Wesley TeLinde was a top cervicales cancer expert who had many accomplishments to his name. One of them including pioneering the use of estrogen for treating symptoms of menopause. TeLinde like many others would use their patients for research, typically without informing them. People like him believed that since
It is unprofessional for Evita to allow the parents to disclose such critical information to her and then have them witness her essentially covering for them to the physician. As a social worker I feel you face many difficult situations where you may feel bad about making your client’s situation worse, but you always need to stay professional and be able to maintain your agreement to the code of
Nothing else. Them doctors never said nuthin about keepin her alive in no tubes or growin no cells. All they told me was they wanted to do a topsy see if they could help my children. And I've always just knowed this much: they is the doctor, and you got to go by what they say. I don't know as much as they do.
Sometimes we as human beings have so much going on in our life’s that we get so caught up with it. We do not realize that other people in our community or in our world there are many children that are getting abused or hurt by their families. An article called “Skagit County couple charged with death of adopted child” that was written by Natasha Ryan and Jake Whittenberg described the life of Hana Williams. Hana Williams was just 13 years old when she died. The girl was found dead in her backyard on May 12, naked and wrapped in a sheet.
A frustrated community, mislead stories, and a phony mother brought to the courtroom in 2008, as a mother was being charged. Casey Anthony, the mother of Caylee, was accused of being responsible for the disappearance and death of her daughter. Caylee had been missing for weeks, before it was reported. The Casey Anthony case was significant to America because it showed our society the careless actions of one mother through the unreliable stories, falsely made reports and evidence that wasn’t thoroughly investigated. This trial was significant to America because it showed our society the careless actions of a mother, and how her choices got her to where she is today.
The second reason or evidence which also goes against Casey Anthony. She told parents, cops, and detectives were all lie the told that she dropped Caylee with her babysitters and when she went back
Reasoning • Kailyn Montgomery, a minor died due to child abuse. • The medical examiner proved the child abuse by the internal bleeding and injuries. Holding The Supreme Court of Minnesota holds that the evidence was sufficient and agreed with the jury’s verdict.
In conclusion, as a future teacher, it is important to understand my responsibility to report any suspected child neglect or abuse. Even if my future student does not give me permission to report the incident, if the child is in danger, it is my responsibility to report. By keeping his promise of confidentiality to J.D., Dr. Pesce put J.D. in great danger. The student was in danger at school because of the misconduct of the teacher, and he was in danger outside of school because of his shame and suicidal thoughts and tendencies.
Two women from Texas, Andrea Yates, 37 and Darlie Routier, 27 both shocked the world when they brutally murdered their children. Both women were described as wonderful mothers who loved their children, but were also described as having post-partum issues during the last years of their children’s lives. Andrea Yates admitted to her harsh crimes and was willing to take any punishment that was given, as she believed she was saving her children’s souls. On the other hand, Darlie Routier did not admitted her crimes towards her children. Darlie Routier pleaded not guilty, but prosecutors believed differently after many conflicts appeared in her story.
The caregivers lacked commitment, compassion, conscientiousness, fairness and honesty, and if they had taken their jobs seriously probably Tomcik wouldn’t have suffered as much. Trial began on July 22, 1991 and the decision was made on October 7, 1991. Tomcik’s total damage came out to be $85,000 according to the text. The defendants were proven wrong and they were charged. The court did the right thing, but I think a stricter action should have been taken against the defendants.
The doctors failed to use a properly consenting patient, neglected Charlie’s emotional state, and failed to conduct proper research. If Charlie had a caretaker who could give consent on his behalf, similar to a minor, an operation of this sort could be ethical. Moreover, it could be ethical if the doctors’ research and further develop their theory before using a human test subject, and pay close attention to Charlie’s emotional and mental health. However, Charlie’s operation was performed without these precautions and guidelines, and he suffers greatly in the
Children are the future of our world, and we have to make sure they grow up safe, to prepare them to make a better world in their future lives. Mary Barnett’s trial in Chicago, the mother who left her six-month baby, Alison, alone for a week, while she was traveling to California without her baby, which caused the baby to die of dehydration. Before going to court, Mary Barnett went to see two psychiatrists, to study her and find out if she has mental problems that caused to leave Alison. After reading the case of Mary, I analyzed all the evidence and concluded that Mary Barnett is Innocent because she does not meet all the requirements to be a second-degree murder. Mary Barnett suffered from postpartum depression, it caused her to get confused
However I do believe the practices with the placenta are a bit peculiar, but who am I to judge it may stand true since Lia was the only one out her siblings to have any complications growing up. When Lia was taken away from her parents that was a tear jerking moment. Ultimately, I have mixed emotions about if it was the right decision to take Lia away. Dr. Neil, saw his job as to practice good medicine.
Ethical Issues in Healthcare There are many ethical issues facing health care at any time and it is impossible to say definitively which is the most pressing or the most important. Health care professionals are expected to base their practice on a set of ethical principles, including truthfulness, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and confidentiality. Ethical issues can arise, however, when a l professional is called upon to act in opposition to personal values or in cases where the values of patient, health care worker, and sponsoring institution conflict. The following issues are presented in no order. Neonatal Ethics Neonates are babies within their first twenty-eight days of life.