Computers added to an officer’s vehicle helps in looking out for details or information on a driver, suspect, or known criminal. The uniforms which they wear have been created to produce a symbol of strength and responsibility which insures they are known to be police officers. Even the smaller tools which are carried by officers may not be of use 99.99% of the time but for the 0.01% of the time they’ll be sure to have the use of this tool and support. An officer’s main form of backup is not always fellow officers but the gun which they carry to defend themselves when a situation gets too dangerous or the radio which they use to report their location, reason to stop, and any need for backup. Technology does not also benefit officers during traffic stops but continues to the most common, the internet and social media.
There should be a valid reason like any suspicion on the house owner in any criminal case. DUI Checkpoint are police stops or any checkpoint where officers are there who randomly stop the vehicles to check for impaired drivers. So, for DUI some of the cases requires search warrant whereas some of them they don’t too. So, its depends on the circumstances. Profiling does takes place but under some valid reason.
Body cameras are a great way to document and gather an accurate recording of events when police officers are on duty. But these devices are being challenged as an intrusion of innocent people’s privacy, since the footage is considered public record . Ethic and Privacy Issues
During search incident to arrest one of these requirements must be present in order to search a vehicle if you make an arrest: 1) The defendant is within reach of the vehicle or 2) Evidence directly related to the arrested offense may be found in the car. These requirements are known as the Gant Requirements from the U.S. Supreme Court Case Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009). Search incident to arrest is also known as The Chimel Rule. In 1969 U.S. Supreme Court Case, Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). The decision was 7-2 in favor of Chimel stating that it was unreasonable under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments that the entire house was searched after the arrest.
Whether the document being preserved is a check or letter, a crime scene investigator must not be marked on, folded, bent, or transported improperly for any period of time. Instead, the questioned document must be kept into the proper evidence collection envelopes and folders and kept dry (Hilton, 1940). Following these steps helps to ensure that the document is not distorted in any way. For instance, if a crime scene investigation is at the scene of a crime and the individual was to find a ransom note, this would be key information. However, if the crime scene investigator decides to write or draw on the document, it could be considered as contaminated evidence and may not be allowed in the court as evidence.
If the criminal process’s disciplinary is effective to prevent crime. The crime control theory would result in the state official is likely to violate the freedom of the people easily. The state official is authorized to use the extensive compulsory legal in order to effectively prevent crime. The result is that the court does not agree to hear evidence obtained illegally that will not appear at all or are very sparse.
This causes a financial hardship for those who rely on their income to pay for their housing and provide for their families. Articles were released throughout the media that named the officers who were involved. Once the media becomes involved, situations like this can be detrimental to a person’s reputation, and can impact their ability to ever work in a professional environment again (Pascual-Ezama, Dunfield, Gil-Gómez de Liaño, & Prelec, 2015). This is especially true for law enforcement.
This helps the police officers close the case without having to conduct a long drawed out investigation. It helps with the victim’s memory of the offender due to the time that the officers placed the him into custody. The downside to this is that the victim only sees one person that they must identify as the offender which could lead to false identification. When we deal with photographic identification this can be helpful in helping the offender by giving them photos of the offender in the processes of committing the crime. It helps to show and trigger the memory of the victim to see these type of photographs.
Instead of ever getting rid of this privilege we should do through background checks on every person that registers for a concealed weapons permit. This would limit the risks of putting a weapon into the hands of someone that has harmful intentions. Doing this can’t stop everything, there are a lot of different situations where it can’t be prevented by just doing a background check. For one a person could become mentally ill and could cause harm to others. Many crime percentages have gone down since the amount of concealed weapons permits in America went up.
It is important you pay close attention to the direct and indirect transfers of evidence and how long the evidence was at the crime scene to find the source. When investigating a crime, some evidence can be classified to seem the same but it can come from different sources or one main
In the criminal justice system a police officer or crime scene investigator cannot legally search a person or property without a search warrant. There have been ongoing debates and revisions on the legal requirements and circumstances under which it is necessary to obtain a search and seizure warrant before crime scene processing. According to the Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements, a warrant is required any time a reasonable expectation of privacy exists. Therefore, in an effort to protect the right of the people and their belongings against unreasonable search and seizures and up hold the law officials accountable for fair treatment and processing procedures.
It is not necessary for the officer
Don’t get me wrong I understand that in certain situations where there’s no other option. But under legal requirements deadly force is only to be used when there’s reasonable belief that the suspect will possibly harm an officer or others in the community. In a situation, such as A shootout with a suspect or a hostage situation I would be understanding of the use of Deadly force and it is justified on the part of the officers. Another situation I feel it would be necessary is when A suspect is seen brandishing a weapon or if you’re in pursuit of a reckless runaway driver that is exhibiting actions to make you believe that they have a disregard for the safety and lives of others. That’s another situation where the officer either has no choice or the decision they make will prevent any senseless