Moreover, not only did individuals begin to see themselves as more important than the society that they were a part of but they became materialistic due to the freedom they possessed leading to a growth of corruption and decay within the society. Hence, Qutb grew disenchanted with Liberalism which he considered to be spreading vulgarity while, similarly, Leo Strauss saw that it contained seeds of its own destruction as it threatened the social cohesion of the community. Therefore, both view selfish individualism to be the root cause of the failure in a liberal society and consider it essential to be removed in order for a strongly knitted society to be formed. Furthermore, both ideologies are elitist as they believe in a hierarchical structure within the society. Qutb viewed the masses as unable to lead themselves as they were self-interested and corrupted therefore the elites who had the interest of the society at heart were to lead.
The public interest is very important for a journalist. Journalist always needs to publish truthful news for the readers to satisfy their curiosity. The journalist who taking risk to invade a celebrity life for the public, risk their own work also. The public has the right to know of the privacy of the famous person especially
Since, this is an ethical question. In my opinion, Freedom of speech should be limited, because it is not acceptable that everybody say whatever he/she wants. There are insufficient of people who frequently use freedom of speech and they are Governors, Journalists, and other citizens. Another thing is the governments are the people who are able to have freedom of speech, so they should not be more doing that. Everyone is the same as the other or there would not be equality, if the governors can have freedom of speech, while the other didn’t then that will be unfair.
As explained by Murphy-Jallali (2017), the Hypodermic or ‘effects’ model relates directly to what exactly it is that media do to their audiences. The audience in this case is seen to be almost hypnotized by the media, which is where the power lies. This model assumes that the media effects the audience negatively, which stems from a position of moral panic. The effects model ultimately portrays the media in a negative light. It portrays the media as a predominantly unfavourable entity which either encourages inactivity and laziness, or encourages unsavoury behaviour such as violence and sex.
Ideology as common sense is forcing people to operate with a system of traces that they have no inventory for. His theory is that perpetuating an ideology works best when the people you are trying to control do not know what they don’t know. The people know part of the story, but they do not know the whole story. This theory of ideology explains why the ideology of toxic masculinity was able to spread so far and so deeply into our culture. The media uses the now mythic symbols of masculinity to enforce their ideologies.
On the other hand, if news media sets wrong agenda it also creates wrong influence towards wrong agenda. As a result, people divided themselves by news and showing hatred to others. One of the duties of journalism is to include complexity, refusing the denial of reality in the affirmation that “there is nothing to understand” on the pretext that terrorists are “barbarians, full stop.” The essential rules of journalistic ethics cover this duty in the independent pursuit of
When an institution is entrusted with a responsibility this huge, it becomes essential to ensure that it be free of any bias. Objectivity, fairness, and balance are the unspoken rules of ethical journalism. While there are a number of provisions to safeguard journalists’ lives, there is not enough being done in the field to protect them from rampant propaganda by state as well as
Thus it is a very serious deficiency in a democracy if the media fails to be accountable, as it is failure to hold the other institutions which are the sources of power in to account. The freedom of press is the right that is jealously guarded and hence free speech is a vital tool in a liberal market economy and democracy. It cannot be unchained free speech and that is why restrictions are accepted for economic and social policy reasons. since freedom of press plays an important role in democracy then it has to be dealt with in a manner that privacy is given a lot of respect thus adequate accountability mechanisms should be put in place so that all these rights are exercised in a responsible manner. There are some of the mechanisms in which the citizens can interact and hold the government responsible or accountable.
The first important element is about the sources creditability, if the information is faulty, it does not have any significance to let people know and believed. Secondly, is selecting and filtering the material have the newsworthy to produce to public because it will affect public agenda. Last but not the least, citizen journalist is non-professional to report the news. Journalist have to discipline about reporting standard such as words, structures and composing. These are the reasons why citizen journalist should not be trusted by the public.
Setting Boundaries in the Media “But we do not live in a perfect world. We live in a world where gossip passes for news, and sensationalism passes for journalism” (Bernhardt, Naked Justice). This quote shows that not because the media publishes something does it mean that it is important or relevant to current events since the media manipulates and publishes what it wants for selfish purposes. The media is also a business, and like any business, its goal is to make profits, and sometimes it uses questionable tactics to do it, for instance, publishing inappropriate content, intentionally omitting facts, and including insignificant and irrelevant information. There are situations in which the media publishes obscene, harmful, vulgar, and offensive