Romeo and Juliet Prince- because he could have done more to stop the fighting. Intro - The mayor of a town should keep the peace which the Prince could not do. Being the mayor of the town he made the laws about the fights. Making the town feel safe is one of the most important things to do. As an important figure he is put in that place to keep everything calm and peaceful. The prince is the most to blame for the terrible deaths. First - he played a big part in the story in the sense that he made the laws for the town. Even know the Prince did not speak to much in the actual play he was one of the main factors in the end. He claimed that if any more fights broke out the people would be killed. The Prince did not follow his own rules and when tybalt was killed by Romeo the Prince just banished Romeo. It would seem in the end that not killing Romeo would be Fatal to the ending of the book. …show more content…
He could have arrested Tybalt and others for influencing the fights and eventually his own death. He did not kill Romeo and that changed the outcome of the story to how it ended up being. Sense he let every thing got out of hand and there was nothing he could do to stop the madness in the end. If he had just blown out the embers to the fire the flame would have never caught and thous changing the story. Third - Others may say that tybalt is to blame for all the deaths. In the end the Prince is at fault for the death if he had just enforced the law and the consequences of them the outcome of the entire play could be different. He stated that anyone caught fighting would be killed for disruption of the peace and the town. Some people think that he was not involved too much and is not the biggest cause of all the deaths. On the other hand making the laws puts him in control of the laws and those causing some of the
He also kills Mercutio, which leads Romeo to become explicitly upset, and Romeo kills Tybalt, eventually being banished. At the dance, Romeo was recognized by Tybalt, and Tybalt was immediately livid. He was willing to kill him without regret. It says in the book, “To strike him dead I hold it not a sin.”
Instead of Romeo killing Tybalt out of anger he could have just threatened him in a way. Romeo putting tybalt down played a large factor on how it has led to the deaths at the end of the
These two character are supposed to be the “bad guys”, they steal from people and do many other things that are a sign of evil. The life lesson that is trying to be taught here is it is not tolerable to commit crimes. In the book the Duke and the Dauphin pretend they are someone who they aren’t, they try to steal inheritance from a dead family member who isn’t even their own family. Once they get caught they are tarred and feathered by the townspeople . It is not respectful to commit crimes and try to get away with it, people who think it’s perfectly fine to live in sin should have a punishment.
With the resentment that he carries towards Romeo’s family always seems to be his motivation to rile them up. His resentment is a major reason he got killed in the first place- seeing as that caused him to kill Mercutio, making Romeo kill him out of rage. You can see that his resentment is what led him to his death when this quote appears after Mercutio basically tells him to just start fighting them- “You shall find me apt enough to that, sir, if you an you will give me occasion,”(3. 1. 18) This quote may have been the first step into Tybalt’s death, as it seems that this is the words that started this fight in the first place. All he had to do was control his strong emotion towards them and walk away- all of this could’ve been avoided that
Romeo acts impulsively too many times throughout the play, and was punished for it almost every time. He did not learn from his mistakes, and this would eventually cost him his family and his life. If he had not acted impulsively throughout the story, he would still be living and he would be living happily with
Romeos and Juliets Death Romeo and Juliet is a tragic play about two love-struck teens that eventually falls in love. They have to face obstacles just to find a way to be together and eventually have to secrednize their marriage. The characters Friar Lawrence, Romeo and Lord, Lady Capulet are primarily responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. They all have things they did that leads to Romeo and Juliet’s departness. Also, the decisions they made and the problems they caused such as ruining true love.
There are a lot of people who are to blame for Romeo and Juliet’s death but the most obvious one is Tybalt. Tybalt was lady Capulet’s nephew and Juliet’s cousin. Tybalt was also a troublemaker and hated the Montagues. To support that, “What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.
Although he tries to do the right thing, his actions ultimately contribute to the tragic ending of the play. There are several examples that support the idea that he is most at fault for their
Death, tragedy, misery, love, and unity, all of these words describe the story of Romeo and Juliet, but it all revolved around Tybalt making his first terrible mistake. In the play Romeo and Juliet written by Shakespeare, the short story is that two young lovers secretly get married, people murder in anger, the two lovers get separated, and then end their lives in a tragic death because of no communication. But, like I said, this all revolves around a mistake Tybalt makes because of the feud between the Capulet (Juliet’s family) and the Montague (Romeo’s family). Tybalt is the character most to blame for the tragic events in Romeo and Juliet because, he killed Mercutio, which lead to Romeo 's banishment, which then leads to the suicides of Romeo
Those deaths could’ve all been avoided if Romeo and Juliet would 've chosen to share their secret with their friends and family. If Tybalt had, had knowledge of the new bond in the family, he would 've been more hesitant to duel, both Romeo and Mercutio. Thus avoiding the death of Mercutio and Tybalt as well as the banishment of Romeo. In act 3, scene 1 Benvolio explains to the Prince the events that had happened in the public Verona streets that day and tries to explain that Romeo was trying to keep the peace, but what Benvolio did not
The Problems of Pursuing Your Own Personal Desire Chase Broderson Throughout the play there were multiple problems that occurred because of Romeo pursuing his own personal desire. Instead of thinking about what he was going to do he went ahead and made big decisions without considering the consequences. If Romeo would have thought about what he did everything would have had a different outcome. For example, if he would have thought about the consequences of killing Tybalt and not done it he would not have gotten banished.
He is moving too fast and too irrationally to properly think about the potential consequences of actions made in rage. Romeo is giving in to his hormonal impulses when he slays Tybalt. Hormones play a major role in the cause for
He murdered Tybalt after a feud between him and Mercutio, where Tybalt killed Mercutio. Romeo, speaking of Tybalt, says “He’s alive and victorious, and Mercutio’s dead? Enough with mercy and consideration. It’s time for rage to guide my actions.
When Tybalt kill Romeo best friend Mercutio Romeo got mad and got revenge by killing Tybalt. Romeo didn’t have to kill Tybalt he could’ve just let the prince deal with him. If Romeo wouldn’t have never
Romeo and Juliet made many sacrifices to be with each other. The decisions and sacrifices made every day in life can either be worth the sacrifice or lead to an individual’s demise, as well as the demise of others around them. Romeo had made sacrifices throughout the story that has taken their toll on the people around him. One thing he sacrificed was his relationship with the Capulets. Their families were already feuding, but Romeo got caught up in the tension and made things worse.