Talking about the United Arab Emirates for example, abortion is considered a crime, unless the pregnancy puts the mother’s life at risk. There are several aspects to be considered when debating for or against abortion, mainly in terms of a country’s religious groups, ethics, economic condition, culture and so on. There are two forms of abortion: the abortion pill and surgical abortion. The abortion pill is medically known as mifepristone. According to the British pregnancy advisor,it functions"by blocking the hormone progesterone.
The term fetus removal most regularly alludes to the instigated premature birth of a human pregnancy. The comparative methodology after the baby may have the capacity to get by on its own is medically known as a "late termination of pregnancy". Abortion has got to be basic in America yet in a few nations it is unlawful depending on your convictions and your backing. I personally I agree with that women may allow abort her child. Christians and Abortion said that religions have found ways to justify abortions numerous religions have discovered
Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending. Immanuel Kant is an influential philosopher, known for his work in ethics and a supporter of the death penalty. According to Avaliani (2004), Kant developed the first scientific approach to capital punishment (Avaliani, 2004). His theory argues that if a crime violates social laws then it is punishable. If an individual commits murder, then their punishment must be death.
In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money. First, I will write about the violation of the human rights. Death penalty is a violation on the most basic human right. It violates that every human being has the right to freedom and life, article 3 in the united nation declaration of the human rights. Humanity
Question 1 Don Marquis believed that abortion is morally wrong, he supports this by uttering that what makes killing an unborn baby or fetus wrong is by depriving the right of living a life of future experiences, activities, and accomplishments, as these elements are what we consider valuable in someone’s life. According to Marquis killing a human being is equivalent to killing a fetus, (even though a fetus is not completely developed, and it’s not classified a human being) because terminating a pregnancy for whatever motive it could be, it robs the fetus of its inherent value, same with killing a person, by doing it so, you are stealing a person’s right to live, and taking away their purpose in this world. Continuously an example of this could be that fetus could become the future pioneer of modern medicine or technology, this is a valuable future not just for the fetus itself but to the world, so killing the fetus, will also prevent of new discoveries in medicine or technology which contributes to the rest of the world, so Marquis concluded that any action that averts a potential future its morally wrong. Question 6
Although it does not have the specific word, there are several verses relevant to the topic .For example, in Jeremiah 1:4-5, it states that before God formed you in the womb, he knew exactly what your purpose in life would be. If this is true, this means that God has a plan for all unborn babies, he even has a purpose for the babies who are aborted. . If you abort your child, you are altering God 's plan for the baby, and prohibiting the human growing inside of you to see the world for himself or herself. Also, abortion is wrong because it is murder, which God is completely against with.
Rosalind Hursthouse in her paper Virtue Theory and Abortion, handles with the moral standpoint of abortion from a virtue ethics perspective. Her research is directed towards investigating whether or not an abortion is something a virtuous person would do. Hursthouse examines the morally relevant considerations and in so doing, she rejects the standard questions used to determine the morality of an abortion such as the status of the fetus, and the rights of a women. The morally relevant considerations she sees fit to assess the moral legitimacy of an abortion are concerns with family relationship, personal circumstance, and basic biological facts. Through her considerations, Hurthouses account of virtue ethics gives us adequate moral advice in regards to the question of abortion.
It is an act of voluntarily or intentionally taking one’s own life. Suicide needs to be distinguished from euthanasia or mercy-killing. Suicide by its very nature is an act of self-killing or self-destruction, an act of terminating one’s own life spans without the aid or assistance of any other human agency. Euthanasia, on the other hand, involves the intervention of other human agency to end the life. Euthanasia is nothing but homicide, and unless specifically excepted it is an offence.
Abortion is an emotional issue that deserves special attention. I believe in the case of Sheila and Roger selective abortion would be appropriate. In this case, Sheila’s prenatal diagnosis determined that Sheila is carrying a set of twins with a genetic disease that will compromise their lives forever. Sheila is very aware of any possible detriments if she gives birth to the twins because her sister has a child with Cystic Fibrosis. Considering the circumstances Sheila and Roger must decide what is in the best interest of the fetuses.