ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of A Constitutional Monarchy

372 Words2 Pages

A constitutional monarchy does not make rules over you and does not have power over you. This means that you as a person decide what to do and they cannot change your decision. Constitutional monarchies connect with different countries, which means that you have allies. The republic is different, the people elect the republican leader and they have written laws that they must follow as a country. Though there are many advantages to both sides of the party’s there are also disadvantages. For a constitutional monarchy, you have allies, this can be a disadvantage because during tough times you would need to put the other country before your own country. You might also not like the leader that got chosen, but that leader holds the position for

Show More
Related

  • Objections To The Constitution Pros And Cons

    322 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. The Constitution originally lacked a Bill of Rights. George Mason from Virginia presented a proposal to add a bill of rights to the document. But his offer was voted down.

    Read More

  • Constitution Guards Against Tyranny Dbq

    237 Words  | 1 Pages

    Constitution DBQ Annalyn McCay The constitution guards against Tyranny in many ways. A tyranny is usually referred to as a person or a group of people that has a lot of power on their hands or having complete control. The constitution guards the U.S. from tyranny by dividing power between the U.S. government and the state governments, it also distribute power between the three branches of government, the Constitution also guards the U.S. from tyranny by having equal representation from all the states. The constitution guards against Tyranny in many ways.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

    1266 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation structured the first government of the thirteen states. The thirteen states included: Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Virginia, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Rhode Island. However, Rhode Island did not vote to revise the Articles right away. Therefore, the proposals of the Constitution continued to be declined by the other states due to not having a balance on votes. When Rhode Island finally sent a representative to the Constitution Convention, the Constitution was approved.

    Read More

  • Constitutionalism Dbq

    753 Words  | 4 Pages

    The early modern world period was from the 15th century to the 18th century. The majority of the population lived in rural cities. Life expectancy was not very long, and the lifespan was twenty-five years old. Diseases, famine, lack of medication, and improper sanitation contributed to the low life expectancy. Diet of the wealthy class consisted of bread, meat, and wine however the lower class’s diet consisted of fruits and vegetable.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Classical Republicanism

    736 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to classical republicanism, the major purpose of government is to promote the common good, to create civically virtuous citizens, and to create a well-balanced government. The idea of Promoting the common good can be found in The Affordable Care Act, an attempt by the Obama Administration to provide every United States citizen with quality access to healthcare. Providing each U.S. citizen with healthcare is in the benefit of the entire country subsequently promoting the common good. The Patriot Act another piece of legislation in response to the September 11th attacks, the main purpose is to deter, and punish terrorist acts in America or around the World. Responding to these horrific events demonstrates that the Government is actively

    Read More

  • Absolute Monarchy: The Best Government

    226 Words  | 1 Pages

    60% of all Americans eligible to vote, and only 40% do. Absolute Monarchy is the best government because in the United States, 40% of people who are eligible to vote simply don’t, it is efficient because king/queen makes all decisions, and the king/queen knows what’s a law and what’s not. The first reason is important is because if less than 70% of a country actually votes, than the people might not get the leader the majority wanted. Another reason is that no one needs to vote because the absolute monarch or king/queen has absolute power.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of An Australian Republic

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    INTRO: So, what is a republic? A republic is a democratic nation in which the highest public office is held not by a monarch, who inherits the position by birth, but instead by a citizen chosen on merit. Australia is a monarchy because it was colonised by the British in 1788. With them, they brought their lifestyles, culture and system of government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The United States As A Federal Democratic Republic

    299 Words  | 2 Pages

    The united states is described as a federal democratic republic because we aren't ruled by any kings or queens like countries such as the united kingdom, Netherlands or morocco etc. a president is elected to run the country by the people. A federal government is a type of government made that includes states or provinces and the central government has some power to individual areas. Other countries that are a federal republic are Mexico, Germany, Argentina, Ethiopia and Switzerland . A federal democratic republic gives states the opportunity to make some decisions and control over their activities.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson Being An Absolute Monarch

    327 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was president starting in 1824 and while he was in office, people had many different views on him. One of those views was that he exercised power as a total and absolute monarch. He was even given the nickname of “King Andrew the First.” Jackson should be viewed as an absolute monarch because instead of electing his cabinet, he appointed them, giving positions to his supporters. He also fired his whole cabinet, which only made people happy to see him as a tyrant.

    Read More

  • A Strong Central Government Pros And Cons Essay

    507 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the Founding Fathers were planning the country, each one had different ideas on what the country should be like. Some favored a strong central government, others saw that strength in the states would make for a better government. Most of the time, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison are seen as the two biggest influences, and opposing views on the role of the federal government. Jefferson opted for a weaker central government, with stronger states and more individual rights, while Madison favored a strong central government, and weaker states. Given that the country was founded on ideas of liberty and democracy, Thomas Jefferson is the more correct of the two.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Constitutional Republic And Constitutional Democracy

    669 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although a constitutional democracy and a constitutional republic allow the people to elect whom they want, they also differ greatly in their governed laws. A constitutional democracy is a form of government in which the power is held by the people, often administered by agents elected in a free election system (''Constitutional Democracy''). Usually any citizen can participate in the US democratic election process with the exception of certain individuals that are not qualified. The majority takes all decisions that favors them while the minority doesn't. In this form of government, people vote for government officials that align with their personal interest and opinions.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Democracy And Republic

    826 Words  | 4 Pages

    Both forms of government tend to use a representational system — i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government. In a republic, a constitution or charter of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a democracy the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority. Most modern nations are democratic republics with a constitution, which can be amended by a popularly elected government. This comparison therefore contrasts the form of government in most countries today with a theoretical construct of a democracy, mainly to highlight the features of a republic.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Having A Strong National Government

    234 Words  | 1 Pages

    In federalist paper #4 John Jay, explains the pros of having one strong national government to protect the people from foreign forces and influences; Rather than having 13 or 4 separate states or confederacies. Jay explains in depth how essential it is for America to be one nation with one government in charge of all states (colonies), and be able to commanded and provide safety to all of the states and its people. He states how much more efficiently one government can,” harmonize, assimilate, and protect several parts and members, and extend the benefits of its foresight and precautions to each.” Through maintaining the upper hand over foreign nations in trading, managing finances efficiently, maintain strong militia, free and united powerful

    Read More

  • Characteristics Of An Absolute Monarchy

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    This can help to increase the land of country. It is also important that the ruler has to have a superior knowledge about politics and economy. So that they will have less possibility of getting into trouble with other countries and they can prevent the country from having a lot of debt.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Government In Bhutan

    1137 Words  | 5 Pages

    Nonetheless, there are various disadvantages and advantages to a constitutional monarchy on whether it is a fair government. Advantages A country that has this type of government usually has stability since someone is designated as the head of state for a long time until he or she abdicates or dies and therefore it gives a country more stability while other countries that change every few years. The education is another advantage since in a monarchy, the coming head of state is known from birth, hence they are educated and prepared to be trained in order to be a monarch, which then affects the citizens since then they have a leader in charge of their country that knows their actions and the consequences as well as the better and worse for the country.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of A Constitutional Monarchy

Open Document