ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Andrew Carnegie

323 Words2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie amassed his fortune by utilizing vertical integration and employing cheap labor, at the expense of the common man. This tactic proved effective when competing with other companies. However, as a result, workers were manipulated and used as pawns in a game with a predetermined winner. Working as blue collar laborers, the employees had no chance to improve their socioeconomic status and their way of life, completely contradicting Carnegie’s own theory that wealth would be rewarded to those who worked hard and proved themselves capable and competent of handling it. Therefore, even though Carnegie shaped America’s economy into the super power it is today, it was not ethical to do so at the expense of people who were forced to

Show More
Related

  • Captains Of Industry Via Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, And John D. Rockefeller

    565 Words  | 3 Pages

    Arguably one of the most pivotal points in American history, the industrialization of the 19th century brought about a new way of life, and with that came intense competition and crucial outcomes. Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie and John D Rockefeller are just a few examples of industrialists that made lasting impacts on society. I believe that these 19th century industrialists did not always play fair, but it was their motivation and intuition behind their choices that credit them as the “Captains of Industry” and helped shape American business. To earn this title, these men had to do whatever it took to stay on top. Being the front runners, they were constantly being targeted and had to fight back to ensure the prosper of their own

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Carnegie Be Considered A Captain Of Industry

    173 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of industrialists main focus was maximizing profit, so consequently, industrialists put a workers’ welfare disregard. For example, Andrew Carnegie neglected

    Read More

  • How Did Robber Barons Affect The Economy

    1329 Words  | 6 Pages

    Beginning as a poor immigrant, Carnegie wanted to support the lower and uneducated class: he knew how it felt to have an ambiguous and undetermined future. In "The Gospel of Wealth" Carnegie said,

    Read More

  • What Are The Politics Of The Late 19th Century Robber Barons Dbq

    762 Words  | 4 Pages

    Labor leaders such as George E. McNeill treated the railroad president as “a railroad king.” (Doc B) Similarly, Andrew Carnegie established vertical integration in steel industries, and John Rockefeller accomplished both vertical and horizontal integration with his Standard Oil Trust. These businesses created a Victorian morality, further distancing the upper class from the working class. A firm believer in Social Darwinism, Carnegie directly addressed the widening wealth gap in his Gospel of Wealth. He promoted the use of philanthropy

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie: Business Leaders Of The Industrial Age

    679 Words  | 3 Pages

    The business leaders of the Industrial Age were both robber barons and philanthropists, but were considered philanthropists because of how they positively impacted the U.S during this time. Some business leaders at times took money and treated their workers poorly which was considered being a robber baron. However, they also made large donations and invented many great things we still use today which makes the business leaders of the Industrial Age philanthropists. Andrew Carnegie was one of the business leaders of the Industrial Age. Carnegie did do things that made him a robber baron at times.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Carnegie's View Of Wealth

    928 Words  | 4 Pages

    This caused unrest among the populace (Brinkley 477). In contrast, the wealthy viewed industrialization very positively (Brinkley 472-473). Andrew Carnegie, one of these millionaires, had a singular view on wealth, and his philosophy both stemmed from and influenced his actions during his life. Carnegie’s view of rampant capitalism and the class separation it caused was radically different from most the population.

    Read More

  • Captain Of Industry Dbq Analysis

    925 Words  | 4 Pages

    There had to be a way to keep the industry growing, with the needs for education, as well as materials for farming and for the use of new inventions in technology. The captains of industry were very capable in providing for these needs. In Document C, Wealth, Andrew Carnegie describes what the man of wealth was responsible for: “To produce the most beneficial results for the community- Bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer, doing for them better than they would or could do for themselves.” The conditions of the lower class at the time gave these men a leading role for priorities, which they were successful with.

    Read More

  • How Did The Rapid Industrial Growth A Curse For America

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    From the era of Reconstruction to the end of the 19th century, the United States underwent an economic transformation marked by the maturing of the industrial economy, the rapid expansion of big business, the development of large-scale agriculture, and the rise of national labor unions and industrial conflict. America was home to the three key factors of production: land, labor and money, which allowed America to industrialize very quickly. The rapid industrial growth was a curse for America because the idea of Social Darwinism impacted the way big business operators thought; this led to hazardous labor conditions which put workers at risk and the relationship between businesses and government created a corrupt bribing system. Big business owner’s priority was to make a profit, most did not care who they hurt to achieve this goal.

    Read More

  • Was Andrew Carnegie A Hero Dbq

    1359 Words  | 6 Pages

    Karl Marx once wrote, “History calls those men the greatest who have ennobled themselves by working for the common good.” By all accounts, a hero is someone who not only has a positive impact on their community, but also consistently demonstrates their own selflessness, morality, compassion, and generosity. Was Andrew Carnegie one of these great, heroic men? Or was he just another wealthy hypocrite, chaining the poor to the harsh machinery of capitalism while claiming to be giving them the means with which to free themselves? By examining his personal life and opinions, his supposed “philanthropy” and the harsh and vile treatment of his labourers, it is evident that Andrew Carnegie cannot, in good conscience, be proclaimed a hero, as in most

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie Dbq

    408 Words  | 2 Pages

    Was Andrew Carnegie a Hero During the late 19th century, Andrew Carnegie made an investment in the steel industry that profited into a fortune, but Carnegie’s earlier life didn’t include wealth. In fact, his family immigrated from Scotland to America in the mid 1800s in search for opportunities. After working tirelessly for many years, Andrew Carnegie became one of the most successful businessmen and philanthropists of all time. Although he accomplished many achievements in the Industry there are underlying reasons indicating that Carnegie was not a hero, such as, his wealth management, inconsiderate work conditions, and hypocrisy.

    Read More

  • Who Is The Rich In The Gilded Age

    191 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rockefeller and Carnegie used hard labor and ran into many complications to get their wealth. But, in the end, their wealth was used for the greater good. Their businesses created more jobs and increased the wealth of the community. Without these people, the community wouldn’t have gotten this far (The Gospel of Wealth). “Had it not been for these captains of industry, the free

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie's Negative Impact On Society

    224 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the late 1800’s, J.P Morgan, John Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie had a negative impact on society because they were Robber Barons. They treated their workers very poorly in a way that should not have happened. J.P Morgan forced his workers to labor under harsh conditions for long hours and low pay. This is coming from a guy who has made millions of dollars and who has started a 60 million dollar business. Knowing how much money he has and how very little he pays his workers shows how ruthless he is as a business owner.

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie And Jane Addams: A Comparative Analysis

    505 Words  | 3 Pages

    At the end of the 19th Century, as the United States was experiencing rapid industrialization, a reconfiguration of the social order yielded opposing visions of social progress. Andrew Carnegie, wealthy businessman, and Jane Addams, founder of Chicago’s Hull House, put forward different methods to achieve such progress, where Addams focuses on creating social capital in a seemingly horizontal manner while Carnegie advocates for a top-down approach. While both of them seem to reap a sense of purpose from their attempts to improve the nation, their approaches vary depending on their vision of the composition of the population they want to uplift. First, Carnegie and Addams’ desire to improve society is partly self-serving. For Carnegie, improving society is the role of the wealthy man who, “animated by Christ’s spirit” (“Wealth”), can administer wealth for the community better than it could have for itself (“Wealth”).

    Read More

  • What Is Andrew Carnegie Ethical Or Unethical

    338 Words  | 2 Pages

    Carnegie’s views on the treatment of his workers are one of the things that he did that are considered unethical. For instance, during America’s depression in the early 1800’s, Carnegie’s workers were repeatedly asked to work long hours for little play; many unions resisted, particularly in the Homestead Strike of 1892. In the Homestead Strike, workers were angry about pay cuts and Carnegie’s

    Read More

  • Underpinnings And Effectiveness Of Carnegie's Gospel Of Wealth

    605 Words  | 3 Pages

    Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Andrew Carnegie

Open Document