Ban of Animals in Scientific Experimentation Animal experimentation has been manipulated by the media to where many people do not understand the cruelness of the experiments undertaken in labs. Using these animals increases the risk of the species becoming extinct sooner rather than later. New research opportunities have provided genetically modified animals, which are able to more accurately model aspects of diseases, now accounting for almost half of all research animals. Many people agree that there is mistreatment withheld during experimentation and scientists need to treat animals in the best way possible. Animals have the right to not be harmed, even though the Animal Welfare Act does not provide them with even the smallest protection.
These people strongly believe that animals also carry rights like humans and it’s against the rights to change their DNA and genetically modify it for human use. Lastly, the people also strongly disagree with the fact that hundreds of these animals are used for clinical trial research and transgenic animals are not unlike. 2. They can be unsafe for human consumption: - The safety for the products produced by transgenic animal is no guarantee. This is true because not all experiments on transgenic animals are effective.
However, in human beings, the percentage may lower and may interfere with the natural biological order of life. Arguments for and against cloning of humans do not make a convincing case since reasons used to back the claims are based on various assumptions and ethical issues. The proponents of cloning argue that the technology can help in solving the problem of infertility; help in cloning dead loved ones, and solving the problem of genetic diseases. Cloning can allow a person to have a genetically copy of oneself with all positive traits. However, such claims have not been proved since no human clone has been produced so far (Melo‐Martín 246).
In my opinion, having animal testing is a great way to test out new medications for different diseases before they are tried on humans, but then again I don’t feel like everything about animal testing is a good thing. For example, a lot of animals die on a daily basis from all the testing done on them. Also, animals can’t tell you if something is wrong, nor is any of this testing used for them. I understand certain points to both sides of testing on animals the only thing is you really have to look into it to understand what really is going
As scientific production over time got more advanced, animal testing began to increase in the US. Over 26 million animals in the US are utilized for testing. They are utilized to advance our medical treatments and make sure, that the product is safe, before a human uses it. Animal testing is heartless and brutal and should stop. It´s cruel and brutal , drugs which pass the tests on animals don´t have to be safe for humans, however, the most important fact why it should stop, is that animals differ from our human body and as a result, they are bad test subjects and shouldn 't be a victim of cruel experiments, which don 't really help us humans, they have the right to live and not to be torchered while they are alive.
Scientific innovation is based on trial and error. Experiment upon experiment is conducted in order to ensure that a certain hypothesis or treatment is valid or safe. However, there is a growing controversy behind the morality of certain types of testing; especially on animals. Scientists have been conducting experiments on animals for centuries, which has resulted in many medical advances that would have otherwise taken much longer to realize. Consequently though, a great multitude of people has begun to advocate for animal rights in this area.
But as we grow up, we were introduced to many types of milk and one of it is cow’s milk. We were told that drinking milk is good for our health and most of the human being love to drink milk, but there are also some people who just cannot drink and swallow the milk even a sip of it. Milk produced by cow is high in saturated fats, the most important cause of high cholesterol levels, according to the American Heart Association. Therefore, we should not drink cow’s milk as the cow’s milk may not good for our bones, causing heart disease and contributes to digestive problems. Firstly, milk is not good for bones as it depletes the calcium from our bones.
It tells all about the negative details of animal testing and the harming to the animals, but it doesn’t include the benefits of animal testing. It talks about the history of developments in the medical field but denies the fact that animal testing has helped those developments. This information will help me talk about the other side of my argument. It 's good to touch base with the opposing side of a person’s argumentative paper so it shows that you are informed and you know what you are talking about. "Animal Research and Its Benefits to Both Humans and Animals."
PETA is a strong opponent of this research, believing that the money used to fund these experiments could be used to save animals facing the possibility of being euthanized in shelters (as opposed to undergoing viable abuse as test subjects). Restrictions concerning the execution of experiments have not been widely discussed, resulting in weak stipulations. PETA asserts that researchers must take a safer route and put their funds in trusted institutions that protect the lives of animals. In addition, doctors go to great measures to attempt to save people with genetic diseases, and many do not succeed. There are several instances where the patients die from the side effects from the formidable treatments made out of desperation and those who do survive often have mixed results.
Experimental Procedures: • The procedures that provide minimum discomfort to animal should be used. • Procedures that ise restraint must confim to federal regulations and guidelines. • Animals cannot be subjected to surgical procedures unless they are required by the nature of research and surgery or for the well being of an animal. • Animals reared in the laboratory should not be released because, in most cases they cannot survive or they may survive by disrupting the natural ecology. 6.