Animal Testing Is Bad Essay

Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.

Animals have similar anatomy to humans, but it is still vastly different. What works on an animal could have a totally different effect on humans. For example, according to the FDA, Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide. This proves that medical testing on animals isn’t necessarily beneficial considering the physiological differences between man and animal. But that’s not the only case of medical testing gone wrong.

In addition, some of the experiments done on animals are improperly performed and cause extreme pain. Anesthetization, intubation, and euthanasia are some examples of lab procedures that need qualified training and proper skill. For example, neavs said, “if a researcher uses a paralyzing agent on an animal but does not monitor vital signs to make sure she/he is adequately anesthetized, there is a great chance that the animal is actually experiencing pain but unable to move.” Sadly, researchers often lack the training and sensitivity needed for proper animal testing and it’s taken out on the animals. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane and the harm and suffering needs to be put to an

The methods of testing are unethical or give suspect at best. People did not name their kid to keep from being attached. They did that because he / she could of died of a whooping cough. Animal testing saves more lives than it harms. People should get animal

Leukemia used to be a death sentence with a survival rate of 4%, but now, because of testing, there is an 80% chance of survival. These odds are much more pleasant than the ones before research. People have gotten help for many diseases because of the research and testing done on animals. Not only does testing help humans, it also leads to developing life saving medical treatments for animals as well.

We may have lost out on drugs that could be very advantageous to humans due to the fact to they would have or could have been detrimental to the animals they would have been tested on. A June 1, 2006 report on Slate.com stated that a "source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” For example, a drug used to lower the threat of organ transplant rejection, was "almost shelved" because of animal test results, according to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, MD, MPH. An argument for animal testing is animals are adequate research subjects because they resemble human beings in many ways. One of these animals are chimpanzees due to the fact that they share 99% of their DNA with humans this is because all mammals including humans are descended from common ancestors and all have the same set of organs (heart,kidneys,etc) that function essentially in an identical way with the help of a bloodstream and central nervous system.

First of all, it is important to understand that along with the question of utility of animal experiments, there is a question of morality. From their point of view, the use of animals in experiments is immoral and inhumane since the results are meant to benefit human beings for the most part. Also, some experiments are harmful and painful for the animals involved. For example, burning, cutting animals’ tails and ears off, poisoning, testing chemicals on them, and other severe practices are done in laboratories, as mentioned in Marinescu and Coman’s article (2010). Additionally, researchers in a lab at the University of Connecticut were drilling holes in monkeys’ heads as a part of their experiment.

Some say that animal experimentation is good for us but is it good for the animals? Animal experimentation is cruel to the animals but not many people can see that because all they are thinking about is themselves. People use animals to test human products on them to see if they would be good for us but how do the animals feel when we hurt them like that? Animals are our companions and they were always meant to be our companions but lately the most they have been used for is animal testing.

The practice has granted a new life to hopelessly ill patients, modified medicines and made the surgeries fruitfully creative. New alternatives to this practice are in making, but considering the rate at which doctors are fully developing them, the society is still years away from bringing up something that can totally eradicate the traditional animal experimentation. Just like every other scientific practices, animal experimentation, too, becomes a success only after many trials and errors, causing a loss of few innocent animal lives. However, those numbers do not seem as a burning concern when compared to other industries that depend on animals. According to statistics, food animals kill 56 billion animals in the USA which largely differed from the 25 million of animal experimentation (Laws and Regulations).

Studies have shown that 92 out of 100 tests on animals for our products don’t even pass through humans. This evidence shows that animal testing is not an effective way to test our products. Another test was done with 1,000 potential stroke products, those that showed up successful in animals (10%) were

Finally, animals make bad test subjects because they are very different from animals and humans. Animal experimentation has caused a lot of uproar, but in the end, people can hope more animals will have happy families to go home to, like the “Chicago

In the end, the minimal protections offered by the AWA and PHS policy provide no real safety or relief to the millions of animals in labs and offer only a false sense of security to the caring public. All it takes is for people to know the facts about animal testing and what truly goes on behind closed doors. If more people understood how it affects the lives of animals, maybe, just maybe their could be a change in the way people think about animal

Animals may have similar body functions, but they can be prone to and resistant to different diseases which makes them unreliable to be tested. For example, cancer was cured in mice years ago, but human cancers are yet to be cured. This clearly shows that animals need to not be tested because of health and body differences. In addition to body functions, animal 's DNA are different than a human being’s.

These animals are dying from neglect and harsh conditions. Animal testing is not even one hundred percent accurate! People have talked about what it 's like to be a test subject. So again, why is animal testing still allowed ?

Animal testing has been a controversial issue for the past thirty years. Society feels as if animal testing is a technique of the past and should be outlawed in the United States like the majority of the world. Federal law shows us how little protection animals have, numerous recalled or discontinued medications are proof that research on animals to predict effects on the human body is highly unreliable. The humane society provides numerous examples of the cruel treatments and conditions animals must endure. Scientists have presented us with alternatives that are more cost-effective and produce less waste with higher accuracy rates.