The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation
In the United States, more than 100 million animals are killed each year due to animal experimentation in laboratories, which is way too many. Everyday animals are burnt, sliced, poisoned with drugs, or executed during psychological testing. Animal experimentation is downright mean. Animals should not be put at risk or harmed to ensure the safety of humans.
Animal experimentation is conducted by universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical and biotechnological companies, and military defence establishments (Murnaghan). Animals are used for testing drugs, vaccines, other biologics, and medical devices to test the safety of the products (USDA). Animals are supposed to help scientists and researchers understand the human body without
…show more content…
So much money is wasted each year for unreliable animal tests. The money the NIH spends every year could be going to other researches that are more cost effective and produce logical results that help us understand human body processes. Currently, there are many alternatives that are significantly cheaper and produce more accurate results. For example, a “sister chromatid exchange” animal test costs a total of $22,000. A sister chromatid exchange is the reciprocal exchange of two chromatid arms within a single chromosome (Sister). The purpose of this experiment is to find out a chemical’s ability to improve the exchange of DNA between two sister chromatids of a duplicating chromosome. Generally, young and healthy animals of any species are used for this examination. The results of this research is split right down the middle; almost half of the experiments done using this method do not work when tried on humans. This shows that these researchers have wasted money that they can never get back. On the other hand, vitro testing, which costs a total of $8,000, is used to diagnose diseases and monitor the clinical status of patients with blood, cell, or tissue samples from the patient (ProCon). “In vitro” means using the test tube method and models based on human cells and tissues (Society). Vitro testing was found to be more accurate than traditional animal tests, and it could potentially replace the need for animals in all medical science research. It would save thousands of dollars and millions of innocent animals’ lives. The amount of money spent for these researches could be going to more cost effective, reliable, and cruelty-free
Scientific Boundaries In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1132 Words | 5 PagesScientist have been overstepping boundaries in many parts of the scientific world, one of these being animal testing. Animal testing is when scientist test on animals and inject them or mutate their genes for a human gain, typically with no gain for the animal. The National Library of Medicine posted an article on the flaws and harms of animal experimentation, these flaws can be put in these, “...three major conditions undermine this confidence and explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, fails to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics.” The first condition being the influence of laboratory procedures and environments on experimental results. The conditions in these experiments show that, “animals in laboratories are involuntarily placed in artificial environments, usually in windowless rooms, for the duration of their lives.
Persuasive Essay: The Role Of Animal Testing In The World
643 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.
Animal Testing Research Paper
1585 Words | 7 Pages"The term 'animal testing' refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and disease. Asserting the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/Argo-chemicals (“About Animal Testing”)”. 3. Till this day, animal testing is considered justified because scientists believe any type of animal is obligated to sacrifice itself in order to make new products safer for human use and consumption (“Save the Animals”).
Animal Testing In Medical Research
1866 Words | 8 PagesHenceforth, as animal testing increased, so did the controversy surrounding it (“Animal testing,” n.d.). Moreover, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are developed for unconventional diseases. Although animal testing may seem ruthless, animals are used for experimental research that contributes to science if there are no other possible substitutes. Animal testing is a debatable topic that still continues to be one until this time. Animal experimentation should persist because it saves human’s life from diseases, ensures cosmetics’ safety, and improves medical
Animal Testing Research Paper
1139 Words | 5 PagesAnimals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
629 Words | 3 PagesOpponents to alternative methods will say they don’t exist, or when they do they don’t operate at the caliber research demands. They’ll claim living organisms are too complex to properly replicate these studies, and even though alternatives uphold animal welfare, they don’t provide adequate results. Sounds compelling, but hear me out, there are benefits to in vitro studies. Pharmacologist and biomedical scientist Kara Rogers PhD. states: “In vitro tests are capable of producing information about the biological effects of a test compound that are as accurate –and in some cases more accurate than–information collected from studies in whole animals.” Furthermore, as Núria Almiron and Natalie Khazaal point out, the justifications provided by the vivisection industry are merely a game of semantics.
Animal Testing Is Inhumane Essay
431 Words | 2 PagesAnimal Testing is Inhumane. Multiple species are dying by normal nature happenings, such as being eaten or something like that. However, that 's just the life cycle. But even with this ongoing cycle, the deaths that happen in it don 't get anywhere close to the amount of animals killed by us humans. Each year, 100 million animals, including mice, rats, dogs, frogs, cats, and more, are all killed for scientific usage.
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
202 Words | 1 PagesThe alternatives to animal testing “do not provide as much information”(Shany). Tissue culture does not work
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
844 Words | 4 PagesOther ways are less expensive and they can use the money on something else important that would help everyone. We would get a lot more out of the money we had if we didn't test on animals but their tissue and get the same results but in a easier and safer method that saves government research dollars that we could use on something just as important. All in all, we dont need to be wasting money when there are other options that are less
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
298 Words | 2 PagesThe United States experiments and tests on an estimated number of 26 million animals annually, for the purpose of scientific research. The outcome of these tests are used to create medications, determine the safety of human-use products, and many other medical, profitable, and health care uses. Gathering research from a living animal is a practice that has been done for hundreds of years, but now in the modern world society is questioning whether this practice is safe and humane. While the idea of animal testing may be challenged, this method is the most optimal source of research for medical advances and should continue to be practiced. Animal testing has allowed for the development and advancement of many medicines that have been known
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
761 Words | 4 PagesModern animal testing for biomedical and disease research first gained prominence in the 1880’s and 1890’s. Since then, there has been a large amount of controversy over the use of animal testing for biomedical research purposes, especially for chronic diseases and cancer. Many are worried about the efficiency and effectiveness of the research, and whether animal testing is still necessary in today’s world, where many other, less expensive, more effective alternatives exist. Animal experimentation, to treat or research chronic diseases and cancer, is detrimental to society because of the biological differences between humans and animals, the expense, and the existence of more precise alternatives. It is no secret that the animals
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
343 Words | 2 PagesIn the United States today, about 26 million animals are used each year for scientific and commercial testing. The topic of animal rights has been a big debate ever since medical researchers and scientists began using animals and their experiments. The main debate is whether or not it is ethical for animals be used for medical research and the rights animals have. The issue is, animals are used research for human benefit and many argue this is inhumane and cruel. In general, the proponents of using animals for medical research argue that it is necessary for improving and saving humans’ lives but are not opposed to finding an alternative that is less controversial.
Animal Testing: Pros And Cons
992 Words | 4 PagesAnimal testing is not working and it is useless. The couple of many alternatives against animal testing consist of Chips relating to human cells and the Human Skin Replica. The first solution is the organs-on-chips method. This is when chips have human matter on them, they are containing human cells. This can show scientist how organs grow and form for humans.
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1681 Words | 7 PagesWith animal testing, it has hindered the focus of bettering the alternatives that are already out there, but it cannot rise to the surface of normality since animal testing is all that people want to believe is available. Is the amount of money, false results, and pain that an animal endures during testing worth it? When will we stop trying to re-create the past and try to move on to the newer and better alternatives that are available. We must try to use these newer medical advances, alternative research choices and find other resources to use—they are out there, we just have not given it our full attention. In order to move forward, we must stop being okay with having mediocre results that way we can use our resources and money to create something beneficial, something that can stay around for a
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation
486 Words | 2 PagesAnimal experimentation is used by most researchers in the United States, and products need to pass numerous tests on animals before they are approved by the FDA. This is why many animals are used in an experiment; Almost 12,000 animals are used in almost 50 tests for a single pesticide. Is this really necessary? Although testing on animals can protects humans from dangerous products, animal experimentation is not necessary because too many animals die, many tests animals pass fail on humans, and thousands of animals are being tortured. First, too many animals end up dying from being experimented on.
More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation
Scientific Boundaries In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1132 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Essay: The Role Of Animal Testing In The World
643 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing Research Paper
1585 Words | 7 PagesAnimal Testing In Medical Research
1866 Words | 8 PagesAnimal Testing Research Paper
1139 Words | 5 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
629 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing Is Inhumane Essay
431 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
202 Words | 1 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
844 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
298 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
761 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
343 Words | 2 PagesAnimal Testing: Pros And Cons
992 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1681 Words | 7 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation
486 Words | 2 Pages