Animal experimentation has been a very controversial debate for many years. About 100 million animals are killed in laboratories for drug and cosmetic testing. They are used for medical testing and for dissecting in biology lessons.
I think animal testing is something that isn’t necessary at all. Animals are not treated well and are often abused by their handlers. Many animals are infected with diseases, bunnies are purposely blinded, and monkey are sometimes electrocuted for fun. Experimenters force-feed chemicals to animals, these force-feeding studies can last up to many weeks or months to look for signs of illness or health risks such as cancer or birth defects; many are also forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to figure out the dose that causes death. After the testing is over with many are thrown back into their cages without any painkillers. There has been undercover investigations where they show video footage of animals living in fear every time someone walks past their cage.
…show more content…
Scientist have developed a new alternative to animal testing this include using human cells and tissues this is known as in vitro method, advanced computer-modeling techniques known as silico models, and studies with human volunteers. Researchers have developed a wide range of computer models that imitates human biology and the development of diseases. Studies have shown that these replicas can accurately predict the ways that new drugs will react in the human body and replace the use of animals in research projects and many standard drug tests. Another alternative is using materials that are already known to be safe. These materials have already been tested and are totally safe and don’t involve any new testing. There are many brands that are cruelty free and great! Such as Burt’s Bees, Earth Friendly Products, Lush, Alba Botanic, and so much
Would you standby watching if you saw anyone getting tortured? The disadvantage of animal testing is that they are unethical to use for our selfish purposes in products that might be a part of our everyday lives. Animal testing is not the solution to getting the results that we need in our experiments. With this in mind, should animal testing still be permitted for scientific research? I believe strongly that animal testing should not be permitted for research purposes because animals have senses and feeling just like humans, tests on animals show different results on humans due to the fact that they are biologically different, and it has many negative environmental consequences.
Animal testing costs a large amount of money, as the animals must be fed, housed and treated with various kinds of drugs. Based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s 2014 budget in the United States, more than $12 billion was spent to support animal experiments. Five hundred thousand and 1.7 million dollar were used to experiment on dogs and monkeys, respectively. However, non-animal testing is generally more reliable, less costly and more humane than animal-based tests. Technology and innovation have taken medical research way pass the point where animal testing is the only alternative.
Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.
Cosmetic research that involves animals has no impact on changing anything for the better. Why would we harm animals for the simple want to test our many lotions and perfumes? Cosmetic animal testing should be banned because it does not improve human life or lead to any medical breakthroughs. Animals are used to test many different substances or products either medical or cosmetic. The most common cosmetic tests are for eye irritability and skin irritation.
Harm such as pain, hair loss, and even death is caused to animals due to animal testing. Animals that undergo these tests are often subjected to suffering due to them being deprived of food, water, and painful procedures. According to the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), animals used in experiments suffer from “pain, fear, and distress” (HSUS, 2021). Animals used in experiments are often killed at the end of the experiment. Animals undergoing research are often housed in cramped, enclosed, windowless chambers.
Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.
It includes such things as breeding then separating or even not feeding or watering them. Other forms of testing, such as toxicity testing, animals are used in toxic studies receive the test substance everyday, weekly, for up to two years with no period to recover. Euthanasia, anesthetization, and intubation, are all test that are used commonly. When performed wrong, they can cause bad discomfort and injuries. In many cases the people in the lab many times lack experience and training they need to avoid animal suffering.
This infliction of pain can also be used to study its physiology or treatment. The animals in laboratories are abused and receive no love or care from the people performing these tests, animals much like people need to be probably cared for or the results could be devastating.” The animals have
Protocols in animal testing are often painful to the test subjects. They are forced to eat and drink rotten food or water, restrained physically for prolonged periods, and inflicted with burns. This is according to the Humane Society International. Some experimentation also involves using lethal
Animal testing goes as far back to greek philosophers such as Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus (304 – 258 BC). Whom once performed testing on animals to advance behavior of something or who aspired to alter brain activity. However there was scientists such as Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), who used animals in order to attempt to improve various human activity within the body. Specifically focusing on cures and treatment for those who don't have them. Later, Ibn Zuhr began to use animal testing to benefit humans in which he would perform surgeries on them to ensure that the procedures would not harm humans.
Did you know that research from "Cruelty Free International" and Dr Haden Trust say that at least 115,000,000 animals are possibly used in labs/experiments each year worldwide? That is one reason why I think that testing products on animals is horrible, and should be illegal everywhere. Where is testing on animals illegal? The article "Cosmetics Animal Testing Has Been Banned in These Amazing Places" (onegreenplanet.org) states that it is illegal to test on animals in the EU, Norway, Israel, and India. But some countries that are considering banning it are the United States, Australia and New Zealand.
Animal testing is not working and it is useless. The couple of many alternatives against animal testing consist of Chips relating to human cells and the Human Skin Replica. The first solution is the organs-on-chips method. This is when chips have human matter on them, they are containing human cells. This can show scientist how organs grow and form for humans.
Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed in the United States after or during the process of animal testing. Animals killed in these testings are mice, rats, birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, dogs, primates, and cats. These listing are ordered in decreasing frequency according to The Humane Society of biomedical research. The animal subjects are held captivity after the experiment whether it be injured or barely alive and countless animals are killed after use. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study.
When I first starting doing my research relating to animal testing, I realize that there were various methods in the scientific world that could be used in this type of experimental phase such as (Alternatives to Animal Testing, 2016): organ-on-chip which are used to mimic the structure along with function of the human systems in the body, cell based test and tissue models which can be used for testing consumer products and etc. The factors concerning and dealing with animals testing has been a part of society threshold of experimental concepts for years even though people have their pros and con’s about its cruel and expensive funding ritual of doing these type of test. There are also many other non-animal systems of testing which have
Scientist have the ability to take human and animal cells into the lab and test the cells for allergies, toxicity, and other occuring problems. Writer of Animal Testing comes alive in the US, Eli Dolgin says, “The research found that the more cellular pathways perturbed by a chemical as observed in a lab dish, the lower the dose at which the chemical causes toxicity in animals” (Dolgin 2010, p.1348). These in lab studies Scientists are able avoid the use of animals and as a result of this lease of the product is used for these smaller samples. In the end, these companies are able to spend less money. Advancements in the twentieth century have give the ability to switch to these methods and do not take long to make