Genetic Differences In Animal Experimentation
Animal experimentation has been used in biomedical, behavioral, and cosmetic experimentation and research for a few centuries; experiments using animals were used in Greece more than 2,000 years ago and since then there have been numerous advances in solutions, medicines, and in the comprehension of how the functions of creatures have been the immediate aftereffect of creature experimentation. Just like experimentation and research using animals is not new, the worry over the welfare of research facility creatures is likewise not new, as reflected in the exercises of different creature welfare and antivivisectionist groups dating back to the nineteenth century, the concern over the wellbeing of these animals has even prompted laws and controls …show more content…
“There are many differences between chimpanzees” or monkeys in general to “humans in DNA sequence and how our genes function. These genetic differences ultimately cause differences in physiology” (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/aysha-akhtar/why-animal-experimentatio_b_3997568.html). “Human diseases are typically artificially induced in animals, but the enormous difficulty of reproducing anything approaching the complexity of human diseases in animal models limits their usefulness”. According to the The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation, even if there were a considerable amount of similarity between an animal like the monkey and the corresponding human disease, the interspecies differences in physiology, behavior, pharmacokinetics, and genetics would ultimately limit the reliability of the results of the animal study, even if there was a considerable amount of research put into the study. One of the most notable failure of the ability to translate the results of animal experimentation using monkey is the HIV and AIDS vaccine research. An enormous amount of time and resources were put into creating non-human primate models of HIV and 90 HIV of the HIV vaccines the succeeded using the monkeys failed in humans. So the monkeys went through an enormous amount of poking and prodding all in the name of a vaccine that ended up being ineffective in the end. Both the physiological and genetic differences between monkeys and humans make the humans’ use of primates to study diseases of humans, treatments for humans, and for pharmaceuticals invalidate the results gotten from the
Animal Testing Dbq
796 Words | 4 PagesEvery year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.
Summary Of Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation By George Poste
531 Words | 3 PagesThis article is targeted for people interested in animal rights, experiments on them, and alternative testing methods. Poste’s purpose for writing this
Evaluate John Bowlby's Theory Of Attachment
1469 Words | 6 PagesThe harm brought to these animals is clear but can be justified by the delivered knowledge of the development of attachment. The results found are impossible though to generalize to human beings, despite having similarities to the monkeys it is still quite different. The monkeys of the experiment, however, have later shown significant difficulties to interact with other monkeys, which can be seen as unethical. In addition, the fact that they were in isolation and not in their natural environment makes the experiment less valid, and so less reliable. Nowadays these kind of experiments would be much more difficult, since they are restricted by ethical
Persuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesWhile viewing animal experiments can be conducted both through the prism of the benefits and the disadvantages, this issue served as a powerful reason for discussions in the society and points out the need for
Primates And Personhood Summary
355 Words | 2 PagesThe article, “Of Primates and Personhood: Will According Rights and “Dignity” to Nonhuman Organisms Halt Research?” by Ed Yong is trying to convince the reader to see a different side to primates. The Great Ape Project set legal rights for chimpanzees, gorillas, bonobos, and orangutan. United Kingdom and New Zealand protect great apes from experimentation. For the Great Ape Project they are basically setting laws and higher standards for primates to me experimented on or held captive.
Why Is Chimpanzees Unethical
921 Words | 4 PagesChimpanzees are one of the many animals that are used by scientists in experiments to test new medicines and procedures on in order to find new treatments for humans. This type of animal is very genetically similar to human beings and is closely related to humans. Chimpanzees have cognitive skills and behaviors that closely resemble human skills. Because of this similarity between chimpanzees and human beings, an increased amount of people now believe that testing on chimpanzees should be banned and is morally wrong. Experimenting and testing new products on chimpanzees is unethical because they are the most genetically similar animal to humans, they are able to experience emotions and feelings, and they are the closest living relative to
Animal Testing Controversy
1632 Words | 7 PagesThere is much controversy with regards to animal testing for medical research and there has been throughout the centuries. We can trace the issue back all the way to the 4th century when we have the first record of animal experimentation, Aristotle dissecting animals for study. In the 1600s, scientists began using animals as a way to explore the human body which led to many advancements in the medical field. Such advancements include Emil von Bering finding a cure for diphtheria toxin for guinea pigs; further research allowed him to produce a diphtheria vaccine for humans (Bright).In spite of these many medical achievements brought on through the use of animal testing, there are still those that argue the practice is not justifiable and should
Persuasive Essay On Ineffective Animal Testing
434 Words | 2 PagesTesting animals is not reasonable because of modern technology. For example, “cell-based methods, next-generation sequencing and ‘omics technologies and computational modelling techniques” assert to the extinct of animal testing (Burden, Natalie, Fiona Sewell, and Kathryn Chapman, 2). The amount of animals lives lost are not justified due to new alternatives. Human products should not be tested on animals because of genetic differences. Humans are animals.
The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesMillions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.
Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing
595 Words | 3 PagesHumanity has a history of experimentation on animals and death is what will come of it if animals continue to be treated inhumanely. On a daily basis animals are removed from their natural habitat and taken to labs to be tested on for human products. Animal experimentation has become a very popular method of research and testing. This procedure is most common in the United States and European countries, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom being the most popular.
Persuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong
1111 Words | 5 PagesAlthough the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.
Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing
697 Words | 3 PagesThe innocent chimpanzees population is decreased and struggling to regain substance. There is a way to stop animal testing. Scientists have not only created one, but multiple alternatives to end
Against Animal Testing
755 Words | 4 PagesWe may have lost out on drugs that could be very advantageous to humans due to the fact to they would have or could have been detrimental to the animals they would have been tested on. A June 1, 2006 report on Slate.com stated that a "source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” For example, a drug used to lower the threat of organ transplant rejection, was "almost shelved" because of animal test results, according to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, MD, MPH. An argument for animal testing is animals are adequate research subjects because they resemble human beings in many ways. One of these animals are chimpanzees due to the fact that they share 99% of their DNA with humans this is because all mammals including humans are descended from common ancestors and all have the same set of organs (heart,kidneys,etc) that function essentially in an identical way with the help of a bloodstream and central nervous system.
Animal Experimentation Is Necessary In Human Life
1016 Words | 5 PagesCohen points out that useful alternatives have not been established yet (2). For example, tissue samples were inspected as alternatives; yet, it did not work because people should test vaccine as living organs which is complicated. Therefore, Cohen points out that, “We can learn [the full organic effect] only by studying the outcome of its use on live animals who are not human” (2). In other words, living animals are the only non-human creatures that can get the results about the reaction of vaccines, such as side effects. Moreover, computer simulation was conceived that it would be alternatives instead of animals.
Should Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 PagesAnimal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.
More about Genetic Differences In Animal Experimentation
Animal Testing Dbq
796 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation By George Poste
531 Words | 3 PagesEvaluate John Bowlby's Theory Of Attachment
1469 Words | 6 PagesPersuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesPrimates And Personhood Summary
355 Words | 2 PagesWhy Is Chimpanzees Unethical
921 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing Controversy
1632 Words | 7 PagesPersuasive Essay On Ineffective Animal Testing
434 Words | 2 PagesThe Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Essay Against Animal Testing
595 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong
1111 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Essay On Animal Testing
697 Words | 3 PagesAgainst Animal Testing
755 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Experimentation Is Necessary In Human Life
1016 Words | 5 PagesShould Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 Pages