The Pros And Cons Of Animal Shelters

859 Words4 Pages
“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who do nothing.” -Albert Einstein

Animal abuse is a problem that has been going on for a while, but early in the last century; people have began to call it out. It wasn’t until 1936 that the first animal shelter had started by Caroline Earle White. However, others have taken an advantage of this, and just send stray animals to shelters, and it seems fine, right? Well, this is where the violence comes in:There are some shelters were there are “no-kill” policies where some shelters will euthanize the animals for no good reason. Some animal shelters have no-kill policies while others don’t. This text will show how no-kill animal shelters and shelters without those policies contrast.

Shelters without No- Kill Policies Shelters without no-kill policies don’t take time to care for
…show more content…
If you have ever volunteered at a no-kill shelter, you constantly hear, ‘I came here because you don’t kill the animals.’ In the website, “Ten Reasons to Consider No Kill Shelters,” it concludes, “Other people go only to adoption guarantee shelters because traditional shelters make them feel guilty and depressed.” From past experience, I personally don’t enjoy going into a traditional shelter because I know what they do to the animals if there is too many them. This all shows that no-kill shelters boost adoption.
And lastly, no- kill animal shelters are profitable to us by creating a charitable mission. This means that we actually benefit by helping out with sparing the lives of pets as much as possible. In relation to the text, “Mattie’s Fund,” which states, “By saving all of the healthy and treatable cats and dogs, adoption guarantee shelters are able to fulfill their life saving mission.” To top that off, when you do something good for someone else, you feel good- same concept with animals.To sum up, no- kill shelters create a charitable
Open Document