The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Is it right to torture something that can feel pain just because it can 't say tell you to stop? According to law in the United States companies can use animals to test out there products to make sure that they will not harm humans. They justify this by saying that animals do not possess the cognitive ability or moral judgment that humans do. Throughout the ages, there have been multiple different philosophers who have created varying philosophies on how to go about ethical dilemmas. If presented this particular issue, Nietzsche would argue that whoever possess the power to make decisions should not be questioned unless no longer in power. Whereas Epicurus would contend that you should look at the consequences and benefits and decide based on which one outweighs the other. Is it worth making a new lipstick if that means killing a few dozen monkeys? Finally, Aristotle would say that animal testing should be allowed for lifesaving products, but not for consumer products. Overall, there are many different ways to approach a ethical issue as seen by the many different philosophies, however, I believe that animal testing should only be used for live saving reasons such as cure for diseases or new vaccines, not for cosmetics or other consumer goods.
Nietzsche believed in power and whoever had it could do what they wanted and he would consider it just. In the case of animal testing, Nietzsche would not oppose it. Since he believes that whoever holds power in the
Animal Testing Satire
235 Words | 1 PagesAnimal testing is cruel and uncalled for, all animals deserve to live a long painless life and should not be tested upon. Companies test any animal they can get there hands on dogs, cats, mice, rats, reptiles, even monkeys. They put the animals in a cage with no holes no bars and “...they expose them with deadly chemicals the animals are forced to breathe in, or they put the animal in a restraint device, sometimes they even drill holes into their skull...” www.peta.org says. These animals they test never get to see the light of day or breath fresh air they sit and stay having no choice but to take the abuse. Abuse that they shouldn’t have to face cause they did nothing wrong infact it was the people who did wrong.
Animal Testing Controversy
1632 Words | 7 PagesWe have the one extreme in which animals are for man 's use and we can use them as we see fit, "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth" (God). There is also the other extreme that feel animals should be treated as equals and therefore not be harmed for food or clothes much less testing "For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man hath no preeminence above a beast: for all is vanity" (God). An ethical debate can often be as easily resolved as a religious one-impossible; however, while animal testing is an absolute must for advancements in the medical field, animal cruelty is not. Thus, in order to prevent more abuse, the three R(s) were created as a set of principles "underpinning the humane use of animals in scientific research" (Procedures). Any researcher who follows these guidelines while conducting animal tests must show that there is no other alternative and minimize the pain or stress to which the animal will be subjected.
Why Is Animal Testing Good
787 Words | 4 PagesIn this paper, I will be making an argument about why animal testing is a good thing for humans to have for the sake of products. Animal testing has caused a great relief of pain and suffering to humans. It has been the foundation of humans finding curves for diseases and then being able to treat those diseases. Animal testing makes it possible for humans to develop new drugs and vaccines. Personally, I stand for the use of animal testing as a beneficiary of science and human products.
Argument Against Animal Inhumanity
836 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Inhumanity We do not have the right to test on animals. 26 million animals are used for animal testing and scientific research each year.(9) From mice to monkeys, scientists use them all around the globe. Animal cruelty is not as present as it used to be, but it is still happening around the world today, if more people were aware of this, there could be changes in the industry. Animal testing has been around since 384 BC by greek physicians and scientists. They performed an array of experiments out of pure curiosity.
Animal Testing Benefits
1822 Words | 8 PagesAnimal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs” (Dictionary.com). This experimentation has been practiced since around 500 BCE, and has allowed the human race to discover many things that otherwise would have not been discovered (ProCon). The use of animal testing has increased, due to its many necessary benefits, such as: helping form vaccinations and uncovering new diseases in the specific species being tested on (AALAS). However, many animal activist groups such as, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have spoken out against the issue. These groups claim animal testing to be “inhumane”
Pro Animal Testing
1634 Words | 7 PagesStanding Up for Those Who without a Voice Imagine feeling helpless and being exploited by other people, with no voice or control over oneself. Imagine having no rights or protection under the law. This is the life of most animals in animal testing. Animal testing is the use of live animals, excluding humans, in experiments for scientific research. These experiments generally cause the animals pain, distress, harm, and suffering.
Animal Testing Is Inhumane Essay
1303 Words | 6 Pages(About Animal Testing) All of which, last I checked, could not consent to be a “guinea pig” to science. An animal feels pain and stress like a human. Furthermore, animals are like children in the ways that they think. They don’t understand what is happening, why they are kept in captivity, and why they are feeling pain. Would it be morally right, to take a child, hold he/she in captivity, and force them to take different drugs that can potentially harm them to try to find a cure?
Animal Testing Or Utilitarianism?
1209 Words | 5 PagesIt also may be claimed by animal rights activists that the only important factor is that animal testing harms living creatures, but the only other option is to harm humans. Andre and Velasquez pointed out that “While we may have a duty to not cause animals needless suffering when we are faced with a choice between the welfare of humans and the welfare of animals, it is with humans that our moral obligation lies” (7). Though animal testing is not the most popular
Should Animal Testing Be Illegal Essay
864 Words | 4 PagesThe harm animals undergo includes being infected with diseases they would not otherwise be susceptible to, electrocution, and having their spines crushed. This treatment that people are often unaware of is immoral, cruel, and unethical.
Animal Testing Is Inhumane
631 Words | 3 PagesAccording to DoSomething.org, “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.” Also, it is said that all 50 states have animal cruelty laws and it is also counted as a “felony provision” but, how is burning, crippling, poisoning, and abusing can be counted for as animal cruelty (Humanesociety.org). Animals sit there feeling petrified while scientist pinch and poke them, they wait until a burning sensation begins to go throughout their eyes and the pain slowly increases. Also, during these experiments the scientists often use restraining equipment in order to prevent the animal to stop moving. Some experiments just call for part of the body to be immobilized while others call for the entire body(Neavs.org).
Why Is Animal Testing Wrong
241 Words | 1 PagesSince the existence of man there will always be issues and problems. One ethical problem that I can not fathom is animal testing. Animal testing is one issue I wish I could solve, for many reasons. Animals deserve rights, even though they can’t speak. The ways animal testing is conducted is not humane.
Double Trouble: Inhumane And Animal Experimentation Should Be Banned
592 Words | 3 PagesDouble Trouble was an orange tabby cat whose life was full of Trouble. She was a gentle creature and should have been allowed to live the normal life of a cat. However, this was not to be. She was one of several cats at University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW) that were cruelly experimented on. These experiments caused her to develop infections, begin twitching, become depressed, and even cause half her face to be paralyzed.
Animal Testing Beneficial Essay
888 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing: Beneficial to mankind or just plainly immoral? A controversial subject such as animal testing always has strong supporting evidence coming from both sides of the metaphorical “battlefield’’, but is there really a need to choose a side? Is it possible that there is a “right” and a “wrong” argument on this topic? Testing different products (albeit medical or cosmetic) is extremely difficult to do without a suitable test subject, because when testing products for humans it is often times frowned upon when e.g. new medicine for combatting cancer is tested on a live person.
Ethics In Animal Testing
1742 Words | 7 PagesThe idea that animal suffering should be prevented only started more than 180 years ago. It was greeted with nothing but derision. What people love to use as a reason is that animals can’t even think like humans do. They do not know what is right from wrong like humans do. Although animals are not able to reason, they are able to suffer and to feel pain.
Animal Testing Banned
738 Words | 3 PagesAnimal testing should be banned because firstly it is unethical,
More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Animal Testing Satire
235 Words | 1 PagesAnimal Testing Controversy
1632 Words | 7 PagesWhy Is Animal Testing Good
787 Words | 4 PagesArgument Against Animal Inhumanity
836 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing Benefits
1822 Words | 8 PagesPro Animal Testing
1634 Words | 7 PagesAnimal Testing Is Inhumane Essay
1303 Words | 6 PagesAnimal Testing Or Utilitarianism?
1209 Words | 5 PagesShould Animal Testing Be Illegal Essay
864 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing Is Inhumane
631 Words | 3 PagesWhy Is Animal Testing Wrong
241 Words | 1 PagesDouble Trouble: Inhumane And Animal Experimentation Should Be Banned
592 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing Beneficial Essay
888 Words | 4 PagesEthics In Animal Testing
1742 Words | 7 PagesAnimal Testing Banned
738 Words | 3 Pages