ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Appeasement

2028 Words9 Pages

Appeasement is the policy of making compromise to the dictatorial power in order to avoid conflict .Appeasement was a policy adopted by Britain during the 1930s. This policy developed from the growing belief that some countries, especially Germany, had been unfairly treated in the peace settlement of 1918-1919.. So in this essay I will explain and justify whether appeasement was the right policy or not .When Hitler started ruling Germany , he tried to stop the treaty of versailles as it consisted of aggressive and harsh terms that the Allied powers had put in for Germany , in order to avoid conflict.It reflected a sense, present in France as well as Britain, that the Versailles Treaty (1919) had either been too harsh initially or had become unenforceable

Appeasement would have been the right decision if it had worked out equally between the countries . Everything that has its positive side, also has its negative side and it was the same situation with appeasement.There are mainly 3 disadvantages of appeasement which are appeasers misjudged Hitler , Appeasement was morally wrong and finally appeasers missed a lot of chances to stop hitler .

The appeasers misjudged Hitler, appeasement was morally wrong and finally the appeasers missed excellent chances to stop hitler . Although the a majority of British people agreed with the policy , there were some who disagreed . Winston churchill were one of those individuals who completely disagreed with appeasement . Churchill

Show More
Related

  • Western Europe Dbq Analysis

    908 Words  | 4 Pages

    (Doc 2) Still shaken by the events of World War II, where German leader Adolf Hitler invaded France and much of Europe for land power, de Gaulle was fearful that a Western European union with German leadership would undo the resolutions of the war. France, having been allied with Britain in the previous wars against Germany, wanted to renew this alliance in the form of a European Union under French and British leadership. However after the formation of the European Economic Community, an organization promoting economic integration among France, West Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg, 21 years later, Charles de Gaulle took a different stance on leadership in Europe. (Doc 8) Having been rejected by Britain in the earliest unification attempts, de Gaulle became supportive of a sans-Britain Community. De Gaulle’s view, removed from the immediacy of French-German conflict, started agreeing with the idea of a French and German led Community, united by similar economies and therefore similar interests.

    Read More

  • How Successful Was World War 2 In 1939 Dbq Essay

    884 Words  | 4 Pages

    If the European nations didn’t follow Hitler then they could have stopped him from growing more powerful and stopped him from starting another war. The European nations appeased to Hitler’s demands because they all feared another great war. The broadcast by William Shirer states,”the Big Four... dispel the clouds of war and come to an agreement over the partition of Czechoslovakia. There is to be no European war… the price of that peace is...the ceding by Czechoslovakia of the Sudeten territory to Herr Hitler’s Germany” (Document 4). In fear of another European war, the nations gave into the German demands.

    Read More

  • Kennan's Opinion Justified?

    171 Words  | 1 Pages

    Kennan’s opinion was justified because he explained the contraction before and after the appeasement, which supports Kennan’s opinion again at some point that appeasement is not needed for the Czechs. The speech that Kennan gave in document 7 proved this by saying that the Czechs defenses are very strong before the appeasement. There is no need for the Czech to scared of the German. This evidence explains the Czechs would be able to defeat Germany with such a strong defensive system. They are able to protect themselves instead of appeasing with Germany and were conquered under them.

    Read More

  • How Is Hitler Justified In 1939 Dbq

    1431 Words  | 6 Pages

    “I asked that Britain, together with France and other powers, guarantee the security of Czechoslovakia. If that course had been followed, events would not have fallen into this disastrous state” (WH 6). Winston Churchill points out that if the government had prevented the fall of Czechoslovakia when they had the chance, the events would not have followed this path. If Britain and France had supported Czechoslovakia from the start, they may have been able to avoid fighting World War II. While they thought they were making a small sacrifice for the greater good, they actually just forced more nations to be sacrificed and eventually had to make sacrifices themselves by fighting the biggest world conflict to date.

    Read More

  • Who Was To Blame For Ww2 Dbq Essay

    1129 Words  | 5 Pages

    Neville Chamberlain had thought that with this agreement to give the Sudetenland to Germany, Hitler would end because the other countries feared him and wanted to avoid what happened in 1914-1918 (The Munich Conference). This fear, however, drove Hitler even more to continue. This appeasement was a great mistake by the world leaders at the Munich Conference because they showed Hitler that they were afraid of him, allowing him to do more things that went against the Treaty of Versailles without any counteraction. Showing Adolf Hitler the fear of the other European countries and allowing him to take control of the Sudetenland was one of the greatest mistakes that the great leaders could make at the Munich

    Read More

  • Causes Of Appeasement In 1939 Dbq Essay

    504 Words  | 3 Pages

    During 1939 Hitler and his party Nazi was a powerful party that was trying to take over everything. The world was plunged into World War II because of the Treaty of Versailles because Germans didn't like how all the blame was put on them,also the world plunged into World War II because of Hitler's party being very aggressive towards others. The most effective response to aggression would be collective security because, Hitler doesn't care,the failure of appeasement,He gets everything he wants. Hitler wasn't happy with the Treaty of Versailles where Germans troops Were forbidden to enter the Rhineland. Hitler still sent his troops to invade Rhineland and didn't listen.

    Read More

  • World War 2 Dbq Essay

    752 Words  | 4 Pages

    He knew that as long as he promised to keep the peace there would be no repercussions for his actions. For example, they allowed Hitler to take back the Rhineland and annex Austria, invade the Sudetenland, and invade Poland. On top of that, Hitler signed a pact with Joseph Stalin, the leader of Russia, making them the largest superpower in the world. The policy of appeasement achieved nothing besides giving Hitler the power he wanted to achieve his dream of world domination. However, the invasion of Poland was the final straw for Britain.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of War Hawks

    281 Words  | 2 Pages

    The War of 1812 and the urge that the War Hawks had to declare war on Britain caused social, political, and geographical changes between the years 1812 to 1815. The War Hawks were a group of pro-war Jeffersonian Republicans. Since the War Hawks were pro-war, they strongly advised Congress to declare war on Britain in 1812. It has been proven that when the time came to vote, most states voted in support of war. Most people voted in support of the war because of the War Hawks.

    Read More

  • World War Dbq Essay

    752 Words  | 4 Pages

    The nations thought that if they ignored Hitler, he would become dissuaded to do what he planned for Germany. The nations continued this for quite a while, even going as far as giving Hitler Sudetenland just to avoid a world war that would start in Europe (Doc 4). This made many Europeans ecstatic, but the Czechs were angered. The gullible British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, believed that appeasement was the answer to all their problems (Doc 5) and that if they let Hitler do whatever he pleased, everything would go away. Appeasement did not go as far as Chamberlain thought it would and it still

    Read More

  • World War II DBQ Essay

    889 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hitler was the main aggressor during 1939 who everyone appeased to, who is infamously known for his rise to power, his persecution of Jews, and his attacks on the world to dominate, that killed so many. Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, believed in the policy of appeasement and appeased Hitler at the Munich Conference which eventually lead to the start of World War II. The Western Powers responded to aggression with appeasement, and in 1939 the world was plunged into World War II, proving to the world that collective security is a better response to aggression. Hitler’s aggression was the main reason why Allied powers felt the need to appease. In 1930, after the Reichstag fire, Adolf Hitler rose to power because he was appointed

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Us Involvement In Ww2

    1664 Words  | 7 Pages

    “In a moment of decision the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.” Those are some wise words said by the President during WWII…. Pres. Franklin Delano Roosevelt. This quote can relate to a plethora of issues, when one may have to make an impossible choice and one does not know what to do.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of American Imperialism

    1764 Words  | 8 Pages

    As America became a great power, it has continued its legacy of territorial expansionism through neo-imperialist policies. Aside from acquiring land and expanding American territory, the United States has established policies that have allowed direct and often indirect military and political control, economic exploitation, and the introduction of American ideals. The U.S. has justified this form of colonialism by claiming that it is for mutual economic pursuits, the spreading of democracy, and the establishment of stable governments in developing countries. Despite America’s noble causes, American imperialism has caused many repercussions. The United States should cease to be an imperialist power as it is economically damaging to countries under its rule, costly to America, violates the fundamental American principle of self-governance, and exacerbates social and political situations in countries America has tampered with.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Truman's Decision

    139 Words  | 1 Pages

    Being the president of the United States comes with the responsibility of making tough decisions that aren’t always perceived as the best, especially when it involves the war. In 1945, President Harry Truman had to make a difficult decision that ultimately gave americans a leg up in the war. President Harry Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan in WWII is surrounded by much controversy but holds many positive advantages that helped end the war. Presidents Harry Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb posed nearly no significant dilemmas overall.

    Read More

  • Positive Benefits Of War Communism

    1012 Words  | 5 Pages

    War communism had a devastating impact on the peasants and proletariat in Russian society between 1918 and 1928. However, the New Economic Policy that followed the Civil War effects was opposite, raising living standards and reinstating support for the Bolshevik party. Vladimir “Lenin” Ulyanov, known as the head of the notorious Bolshevik party, introduced War Communism (1918-1921) and the NEP (1921-1928). As Martin McCauley states “If War Communism was a leap into socialism then the New Economic Policy was a leap out of socialism” The aims of War Communism and the NEP were both successful in a large number of areas, however, the effects of both policies were not all favourable.

    Read More

  • Evaluate The Role Of The Economy And Propaganda Essay

    1903 Words  | 8 Pages

    Evaluate the role of the economy and propaganda in Hitler's maintenance of power Seungchan Yang After Hitler took a power in Germany, he managed to consolidate his power using his economy policy, gathered destitute Germans together, but also using the propaganda, increasing the support towards him. This increasing mass of supports towards him due to his policy that had increased the employment in a tremendous amount and the use of propaganda that had spread his belief and convinced Germans. However, despite these successful economic policy, the fund raised was purely concentrated on rearmament and still the autarky was not achieved, and his economy policy was just for the violation of Treaty of Versailles. Still, Hitler’s decisions in

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Appeasement

Open Document