According to DeVitis (2010), the social stigma of teenage pregnancies, have popularly perceived to have lessened. However Abrams et.al (2008), had stated that the stigma that is associated with teenage pregnancy, can be profound with misery and immorality, being attributed to the teenager. When society hears teenage parents, they usually think that because of their age that they are unable to get or finish their education, being wealthy and successful, getting married and being outstanding parents. Sometimes, this stigma can prevent the teen from going back to school and doing well, because of the image that has been created of them. This is where the Equality Acts comes in, to help prevent these young parents being discriminated against.
It could have been a flat tire, traffic, and miscommunication. Some celebrities in Hollywood have been scrutinized on their strict authoritarian parenting style. Famous footballer David Beckham and his music artist wife, victoria beckham has been judged harshly for the strict guidelines they give their superstar children. Their response to this negativity is that they do not want to raise their children to be respectful of others and have established appropriate boundaries. An unlikely notable authoritarian parent is popstar liberal Madonna.
In addition, it might cause deterioration in the family relationship. When parents are in complete control over the daily life of their children, they would cause resentment towards their parents. Family conflicts would eventually exist and children might become more rebellious which is contrary to the original objectives of applying authoritarian parenting. Therefore, it suggests that this parenting style is not effective and authoritative parenting would be a great substitute to replace
In “The Favorite Child” by Ellen Weber Libby, the author shows how favoritism can have a negative effect on the favored child as well as the unfavored child. Throughout the essay, Libby explains how parents favoring one child over another can result in both the favored and unfavored child experiencing depression in their life. There are many ways that favoritism can impact the unfavored child in a negative way. First off, the unfavored children have never received affirmation from their parents so they often live their lives looking for validation. They grow up insecure and don't feel that they are lovable.
As an illustration, if your toddler said thank you after receiving something they had asked for, you should then praise the action by saying “it was very nice of you to say thank you”, rather than just saying “good job”. In turn, this helps the toddler understand the behavior that is being praised. In sum, then praising children is fundamental to their intelligence and development; however, such praise has to be carefully phrased. Intellectual and ability praise is not only harmful to the child's growth, but it can also be detrimental to the relationship between parents and their children. Furthermore, without the proper wording of the praise children may see it as empty and feel as though they lack the ability of the task at hand.
It affected his self-esteem and made him have a negative outlook on being labeled as gifted. I scored both of the following statements, Acceleration options such as early entrance, grade skipping, early exit, and telescoping tend to be harmful for gifted and talented students and Gifted students have lower self-esteem than non-gifted students as a reality on my quiz. Once reading the myth justification, I recognize now that it was important to consider the social and psychological adjustment of each student for whom such options are being considered as well as cognitive capabilities in making the optimal match to the student's needs (Rogers, 1991). In the conclusion, both teachers only considered his intellectual ability not the social and psychological adjustment. Furthermore, as a parent, I considered it all, but his teacher had already mentioned to him before my discussion was final on his advancement.
The key assumption of the above punishments would be a result of a safer climate and/or classroom experience for all children as well as sending a strong deterrent message to all other students. (APA Task Force, 2008; Gregory & Cornell, 2009). But in fact it has been established that non-attendance due to the punishments listed above can lead to negative child well-being outcomes such as; poor academic performance, low school attachments, delinquency, drug use, sexual promiscuity, and eventual school dropout which ultimately does not promote a safe and welcoming classroom experience for all children (Sutphen, R., D., Ford, J., P., Flaherty, C.,
The idea of low self-control is a reflection of ineffective parenting according to Gottfredson and Hirschi. When there is a weak relationship between parent and child or when parents fail to recognize and correct their children’s wrongdoings. The failure to deter a child from criminal activities at a young age results in the low self-control behavior continuing into adulthood and elevates their criminal activities from petty crime to potentially
To solve these problems parents try to use various ways of influence on their children. Some of them are effective, some are not, it is very individual and depends on the character of the teenager. Moreover, it is age of storm-and-stress that causes much misunderstanding. According to the scientific research, teenagers with proper upbringing have fewer problems with their parents and generation gap is not so noticeable in these families, contrary to children from dysfunctional families who suffer from the lack of parental care, misunderstanding and indifference. First and most effective way of influence in young people’s behavior is giving a good example.
attaining girls did not put themselves forward to answer questions. Nonetheless, if a boy is low attaining he is stereotyped as a behavioral troublemaker. There are also studies which have also shown that when girls performed academically better than boys, a strong link was made to their background at home. For example, the kind of schools they attended from a young age, with whom they lived, and their parents’ occupation. Therefore, gender discrimination among school children needs closer investigation.