The manger will not have to rely for any help from other people to complete their task and they can decide what they want and they do not need to ask others and this will result in reduced stress. Disadvantages of autocratic leadership Fewer Personal Rights • Autocratic leaders tend to assert dominance, commanding rather than discussing with others -- the opposite of democracy. In an autocratic leadership, one person or a small group make all the decisions. When autocratic leaders demand control, sometimes complete control, over others, it is called totalitarianism. When a totalitarian dictator is in charge, people have even fewer rights, as every aspect of life is decided by their ruler.
There are many benefits to a democratic style of leadership: The democratic style of leadership makes better decisions as more employees are involved in the decision making process. Managers take on board the views of their employees. By doing so managers can make more informed decisions by listening to the ideas of others. The democratic style of leadership also helps to improve industrial relations as employees are consulted before any major decisions or changes are made to the organisation. This will help employees within the organisation to trust their
(n.d.) Eventually, it can not be expected that all people are educated, rational and trained for making hard calls in hard times with emergency. Thus, autocratic leadership prevents dualism to not have friction and gains power with believing in same ideas.
Through this assignment, we learn that autocratic leadership style is not always the best, as many issues may arise especially employees may felt they are not being appreciated. Therefore, a leader should always be flexible in different kind of situation and it is encouraged to discuss with the employees before making a decision since it helps to generate different kinds of ideas and at the same time it makes employee to feel
However in some situations, where the employee has gained complete understanding in his field of work and has proved time and again decision making capabilities, he may be better off with a laissez-faire leader (Goodnight, 2011). Laissez-faire leadership style is essentially the absence of any leadership. Here the leader avoids all responsibility by keeping himself preoccupied thereby being absent when employees seek support and direction. This style should be differentiated from empowering leadership as here, the leader gives no advice is given as to how to achieve objectives even when the performance
In situations where roles are unclear or time is an important factor, democratic leadership can lead communication failures and uncompleted projects. In some cases group members may not have the necessary knowledge or expertise to make quality contributions to the decision making process. 9. Conclusion Based on the findings it was concluded that majority of secondary school head teachers in Meru district had adopted democratic leadership style. Schools which had adopted democratic leadership style had mixed results regarding students’ performance in the NECTA performance; findings show that there are those who performed well while other performed poorly but to a larger extent democratic leadership leads to better academic performance.
Laissez-faire, this French phrase for “let it be,” when applied to leadership describes leaders who allow people to work on their own. Laissez-faire leaders position responsibilities and avoid making decisions, they may give team’s complete freedom to do their work and set their own deadlines. Laissez-faire leaders usually allow their subordinate the power to make decisions about their work. They provide teams with resources and advice, if needed, but otherwise do not get involved. This leadership style can be effective if the leader monitors performance and gives feedback to team members regularly.
Such leaders demonstrate utter confidence in decision-making that is associated with operations and strategizing. Steve Jobs was known to be authoritarian in his approach. Autocratic leadership is effective when a leader is has to be quick in decision-making and emphasize on specific task, rather than complex ones. The style works best for stressful situations such as construction and military. For poor performance, the autocratic leader at helm will address the situation with his/her knowledge and
This high level of responsibility means that project managers must ensure they have the necessary skills and abilities to perform the job better than anyone else. They must have the knowledge of project management, must be able to accomplish the project while applying his/her knowledge, and he/she must ensure they are acting like a professional during the project (Project Management Institute,