For many years the police was portrayed as a superhero or a villain. Mentioned in the book ESSENTIALS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE police are recognized for using deadly and non-deadly forces which identifies them as a super hero or a villain. With this information given there are ways to accommodate the understandings for police actions, one essential and efficient way is a body camera. A body camera is a small device that police officers put on their uniform to video tape their surrounding and their actions. This device is idealistic to use for court purposes for evidence in justifying their actions.
The information that is important to understand is the role of a patrol officer. A patrol officer’s duty is to deter crime by maintaining information,
…show more content…
“While body camera evidence has already played a role in the disciplining of a few officers nationally, advocates are warning that the technology will not be a magic bullet for behavior or resolution of legal disputes.” Meanwhile the body-warn cameras are known for having evidentiary value. They are useful for resolution of citizen complaints and also yield evidence for criminal prosecution. Additionally body cameras are admirable for those who are training to be a police officer, so they could watch how police- citizens encounters. Although on the other hand this body worn camera can also have limitations for legal complications. “Officer Privacy is also an issue with cameras. A number of police unions were resistant to in-car cameras, and the same concerns have been expressed with the advent of body cameras. When, for example, can the camera be off?” This is actually violating the sixth amendment which is indication of privacy. As well as the cost for this newly used technological device. Body cameras are expensive, a number of logistical problems are caused by enormous amount of videos that have to be not only stored but secured and the question for this is how much does it cost to secure these …show more content…
There are two types of forces that need to be concentrated on; deadly force and non-deadly force. “The term deadly force refers to the actions of a police officer who shoots and kills a suspect who flees from arrest, assaults a victim, or attacks an officer.” There has been numerous reporting’s so far on police attacks, a lot of them creating race wars. In the book ESSENTIALS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE it is noted that the actual number of people killed by the police each year are between 400 and 250 people, resulting to body cameras to see why there are killings that involve the police. There are tactics to control deadly force one of them being seeing a psychologist also the fleeing-felon rule in many states. As well as a law where police officers cannot seize and unarmed, non-dangerous suspect by shooting him dead if so consequences will
The many positives of body cameras come with the downside that it would cost millions of dollars for all policemen to wear a camera on their uniform. The cost of these body cameras may seem like an issue in the beginning, but the way they will be utilized will defiantly pay off in the long run. In order for the cameras to get the proper use the police officer has to turn them on. The American Civil Liberties Union “wants law enforcement agencies to use technology that prevents videos from being deleted by police” (Hill, 2014). This is really important and so is having cameras that cannot be turned off by the police officers, because “ACLU has gotten reports of shenanigans where cameras are mysteriously turned off at crucial moments”
The reason for this statement is body cams are an officer’s defense according to the passage “Body cams protect officers from deceitful reporting which can sway public reporting”. This is all the more to have body cams it works out for the community and law enforcement. The cams can also allow for officers to review footage if an incident would arise where the officers would have to defend themselves form public voice. Allowing them to do so can improve relation with the public. Most officers will see the cams as a threat but they are here for condemning the bad and parsing the good
In Fort Worth, an officer Sikes gave an anecdote that boils down to him having experiences where people would begin aggrandize their reactions and they would begin to calm down once they knew they were being recorded. Secondly, many police officers actually want body cameras to protect themselves against false accusations or brutality, discrimination, and many other things. In Denton County, there was a specific incident where a witness video just showed the perspective where the cop unjustly tases an African American at a NAACP protest. However, that police officers body cameras saved him in the lawsuit because it revealed that the had actually warned the person by saying “get back” multiple times before any actions were
Many people suggest that body cameras on police officers are effective in a robust way, but that is not always the case. Police body cameras cause multiple issues not only for the public, but for the officers themselves as well. The negative outcomes out these cameras being put to use on officers outweigh the positives. Many more problems occur when officers using this equipment.
It has been an ongoing debate all throughout the world whether body cameras have a negative or positive impact on community policing. Body cameras are a huge necessity for police officers as their daily duty in order to stay safe. These cameras were an idea that was being thought of before the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. Since this incident, the idea of body cameras has grown due to racial protests relating to police brutality. Following multiple police related incidents, people have been focusing more on how body cameras would be something good to obtain.
It’s no secret that everyone holds their own opinion regarding the actions of police officers and other positions of authority within these past years, be it positive or negative. From the shootings of innocent and unarmed civilians to disciplinary action being taken against those that haven’t done anything unlawful, there’s rarely a day when the police force of the United States doesn’t find itself involved in some sort of controversy. No matter what side people find themselves supporting in these instances, be it the police or the civilian, it’s true that both sides can benefit from the use of these police body cameras. Police body cameras hold one main purpose and that’s to deteriorate the ever-present risk of unnecessary aggression on
Oddie Shoupe, a Tennessee sheriff has recently been sued for proudly stating to his fellow officers that he loves to kill people (foul language was used) right after they shot and killed a man by the name of Michael Dial. Shoupe made this explicit statement under the assumption that his men’s body cameras were turned off and in the trunk of their squad cars. Fortunately, one of the cameras managed to record the audio. The issue at hand is that body cameras are definitely needed, police dishonesty and brutality is a top issue in the world and if body cameras are used, American citizens and the world in general can rest a little easier. Body cameras can help secure evidence in court, keep the police honest to the citizens, and shed
Did you know “... the main reasons (about 80% each) that local police and sheriffs' offices had acquired body-worn cameras were to improve officer safety, increase evidence quality, reduce civilian complaints, and reduce agency liability” (“Research on Body Worn Cameras and Law Enforcement”)? Police body cameras have multiple usages and ways they can be useful to society. Police body cameras should be enforced to protect both officers and citizens. To begin, police Body Cameras can improve the chance of having better evidence to prove accusations. The author states, “One 2016 study found that 92.6 percent of prosecutors’ offices nationally in jurisdictions where police wear body cameras have used that footage as evidence in cases against private
Imagine this you are a young police officer working night shift and you see a car traveling at a high rate of speed down a back road, so you turn your car around and give chase. As you get closer to the car, they pull over, they get out, and they run off, so you get out of your car and run after them. As you are running after him, you see the flash of a handgun. You draw your gun and shoot back hitting the assailant. Fast forward a few months, you are in court trying to prove that what you had done was justified.
Cameras main job is to record, cameras see what we can’t, let us play over a video. But when you put then on police officers many good things come out of it. Putting body cameras on police officers and help the police department and the community. According to Junior Scholastic Police officers that used body cameras used 66% less amount of force than officers who did not try on the cameras. Police supervisors also got 88% less complaints about police officers that wear body cams than police officers that did not wear body cams.
Now there is two possible outcomes, there was police misconduct and abuse of power, or the police officer did everything correctly and by the book. Either way there needs to be something that can protect the public from police misconduct and also protect law enforcement from dealing with false accusations that can tarnish their reputation. That is why body worn cameras need to be mandatory for all police officers to wear because it protects the public and the police officers that are wearing them. A couple positive outcomes police officers wearing body cameras is how they can lower police officers misuse of authority and also lower false complaints against officers as well. These are two
From interactions on the street to testifying in open court, an officer’s word is everything. Once that credibility is gone it is almost impossible for that officer to continue in a law enforcement capacity. Body cameras have emerged as a potential solution to the evolving discussion around police trust and legitimacy issues. One benefit of having a body camera is that if a critical incident, officer involved shooting, or accusation of brutality arises, the camera will provide footage from the officer’s point of view that
Body cameras used by police officers are little cameras that are attached to the officers vest and it records every interaction with a suspected suspect. Evidence can provide meaning and show key things that may have happened during a situation. Footage also protects everyone; this means everyone in the situation is protected because the world is watching them. Body cameras also have reliable technology meaning the technology on the
A major benefit for having body cams is the fact that it will decrease the force used by Police Officers. For the past couple of years there has been many videos of Police Officers using excessive force against innocent victims, especially with African Americans. “The notion has been around for a while. But since August 's fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri -- for which witness accounts varied widely -- it 's gained traction to become part of the national conversation about police conduct.” (Brandon Griggs 1)
Body cameras are seen as an invasion of privacy, as they provide state-owned footage. When police cameras are on, they will capture everyday civilian and police behavior that does not necessarily need to be recorded. Because it is not practical to have cameras play constantly, there must be guidelines for when police should turn their cameras on and off. Many current policies encourage the cameras to be turned on only when police are among the public (Baum,